|
![]() |
#1 |
Avalon Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 8
|
![]()
Hi
Thank you for the excellent forum and opportunity to discuss with, and learn from, other esoteric science and UFO phenomenon enthusiasts. A tiny fraction about myself: I most assuredly believe that the phenomenon of UFOs is real. I do not make claims that underline my own beliefs as "proofs" for their origin. I do however purpose several specific hypothesis for their origin. I myself in the company of another independent witnesses, had an extensive UFO sighting/experience several years back. This sighting was further corroborated via a local newspaper that wrote up and documented the incident because of multiple eye witness accounts phoned into them, apart from myself, of the same sighting by several others in the community where I still reside. I would like to start by asking an honest question: To the best of any and all forum members knowledge, has there been any real determination as to MR. Sereda's authenticity and legitimacy as a credible authority and researcher? I have learned the (hard way) fact that it doesn't pay to assume a convinced position concerning ANY presentations or explanations with respect for any type of, as of yet, unexplained phenomenon. I have myself run into some pretty serious brick walls concerning David's education and qualifications with respect to his purposed Quantum Physics related claims. I also note that he makes some pretty incredible claims with respect to what he supposedly claims are direct contact with religious deities. Having paid for and watched Evidence: The Case For NASA UFOs several times, taking detailed notes and doing a little fact checking, there is ample evidence for inaccuracy "holes" in the fabric of MR. Sereda's presentation. Your sincere thoughts on this matter are incredibly important to me. Thanks! Electra |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Avalon Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 8
|
![]()
Surely there is someone "here" that takes this as serious as I have. Please respond.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Avalon Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Uisneach, Ireland
Posts: 477
|
![]()
I thought the case for nasa ufo's was quite good, there was some obvious evidence there based on the shuttle footage, and there was a good case for how the craft faded into the uv spectrum. But sereda was a bit too enthusiastic in promoting his theories, that he was dismissed as a cook.
When he turned up with the woman and the dog in from here to andromeda i gave up on him... I don't think he is relevant anymore, he is off on his own project and he'll show us all when he builds his flying saucer, just hope he doesn't start abducting us, one love |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
Avalon Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 421
|
![]() Quote:
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
Avalon Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 8
|
![]() Quote:
I have very similar feelings. It's a shame that the man did not exercise more discipline with respect to his initial "NASA" case. He seemed very genuine but when I tried to validate numerous claims he made in his presentation, I ran into some difficulty. The biggest roadblock I ran into was validating that man's education credentials. It's obvious he is very intelligent and possesses a degree of understanding with respect to Quantum Physics, but I could find no evidence of a formal degree or education. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Avalon Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Milky Way
Posts: 267
|
![]()
David Serada Dec 2008 interview on coast to coast
http://www.youtube.com/view_play_lis...3A23F6F7F21936 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|