|
|
![]() |
#1 |
Avalon Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Uisneach, Ireland
Posts: 477
|
![]()
I thought the case for nasa ufo's was quite good, there was some obvious evidence there based on the shuttle footage, and there was a good case for how the craft faded into the uv spectrum. But sereda was a bit too enthusiastic in promoting his theories, that he was dismissed as a cook.
When he turned up with the woman and the dog in from here to andromeda i gave up on him... I don't think he is relevant anymore, he is off on his own project and he'll show us all when he builds his flying saucer, just hope he doesn't start abducting us, one love |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
Avalon Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 421
|
![]() Quote:
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
Avalon Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 8
|
![]() Quote:
I have very similar feelings. It's a shame that the man did not exercise more discipline with respect to his initial "NASA" case. He seemed very genuine but when I tried to validate numerous claims he made in his presentation, I ran into some difficulty. The biggest roadblock I ran into was validating that man's education credentials. It's obvious he is very intelligent and possesses a degree of understanding with respect to Quantum Physics, but I could find no evidence of a formal degree or education. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|