|
|
|||||||
| Project Camelot General Discussion Reactions, feedback and suggestions on interviews, current events and experiences. |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 | ||||||||
|
Avalon Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Australia
Posts: 222
|
Quote:
Quote:
Either you're still a teenager who understandably hasn't yet found the cornucopia of the ages - which has been distilled in the last two centuries - or you've been living in a shoe man. James claims the WMM is unique and he must know better. Look past the wrapper and you'll see it's not. You might also discern who his targets are (for demolition) and you may even percieve motive. Quote:
Check this: Quote:
Lovely. Quote:
Quote:
Really. Quote:
Quote:
This reminds me of that scene in "Life of Brian" where he's yelling to the great throng... "You're individuals". And they reply in unison... "YES! WE'RE INDIVIDUALS!" Last edited by milk and honey; 12-11-2008 at 08:08 AM. |
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Avalon Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 229
|
[/QUOTE]
Quote:
Athough James mentions the ELOHIM, he does not breathe a word about them being Ultraterrestrials, high beings of non-locality. To suggest that they reside in our oceans with the Atlanteans that never left, is nothing but preposterous. To state that all channeling is psy-ops is also illogical. If there are high beings of non-locality, and there most certainly are, they can, and do, communicate with us on a telephatic, for lack of a better word, level. So can other beings, including humans. To use discernment is a necessity, as with any type of communication. But if James is in league with NWO ideologists and policymakers, whose longexpected design is to declare all channeling illegal, they will have to grant someone the privilege of deciding what is 'allowable communication', no doubt allocated to a 'Truth Commission'. They might go all the hog and establish a centralized 'Information Corporation', a vision George H. Bush Sr talked about in the early 1990's. Anything emanating from such a construct will not be along the lines of a plurality of truth, quite the contrary, it will be based on the opinions of the few chosen and trusted to toe the official line of truth. In comparison 'Embedded Journalism' will pale as an example of the absence of independent research. The value of James' interaction with us here on Avalon, is the opportunity for us to hone our ability to discern. Some have not developed that ability, and will be upset with any constructive feedback on his material, feeling it has to be accepted as a whole or rejected as a whole. These are never the only two options, there is always the 3rd corner, that of careful analysis. I am VERY curious as to which corner Kerry is landing in regarding this material. We are, in fact, not robotniks yet, regardless of what James is implying. Nice try. Last edited by Josefine; 12-11-2008 at 11:53 AM. |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|