tether incident

[fossileyesed]

[QUOTE=zorgon;80112]Which one? The STS 75 or the one a month later by the OTHER space program?[/QUOTEthanx Zorgon.i was referring to sts 75and know nothing about the other one{other space program}iwas aware there were other space station tether tests,but i learned that through mainstream media. no details thou.any info appreciated.thanx again.peace out .Kent

[feardia]

I watched that live on bbc news 24, the newscasters were freaked out, as was I. They never showed it again. The real question is: why have they not gone back to the moon? They would rather build a space station and hang it on nothing, than throw a few huts onto our pre-existing satellite. Strange days indeed...

Originally Posted by fossileyesed

.i was referring to sts 75and know nothing about the other one{other space program}

I knew that... just testing what you know

Tether... a means of collecting FREE ENERGY by simply dragging a copper wire through the Earths magnetic field. Generates electricity in the form of Plasma...

NASA messed up because their scientists said there would not be a lot there but they were wrong... The amount of power collected in the first few minutes caused a sustained arc that fried the Tether and caused damage to the shuttle.

They were so sure that the power would be minimal that they did not install a circuit breaker.

Here is the moment of arcing...



One of the plates that got 'zapped'


The tether actually produced 3.5 kilovolts before it broke (fried) and continued to arc as it drifted away.

The reason it continued the current flow is because a plasma sheath formed around the tether allowing a continuous circuit to be created. In effect it was like a fluorescent tube without the glass.

This is why it was so wide and bright even when it was over 80 nautical miles away at the time they filmed it.

It was this plasma glow that attracted the 'critters' similar to a moth drawn to a flame... except that THESE critter feed on the plasma.

This is why they are seen in a thunderstorm... like STS 80

That ought to keep you for awhile...

BTW these 'critters' can be in space or in the atmosphere and I believe many ghost sightings may in fact be critters.

Also in my calculations...
80% of UFO sightings are 'critters'
15% are ours, (all the triangles)
5% are 'visitors'

The fact that most sightings of UFO's are critters accounts for the fact that there is no hard physical evidence. Since these are creatures of energy that can barely be seen in the visible spectrum, I doubt they leave much behind for us to find.

Don't forget that the NASA STS75 film was taken in infrared... with a special camera to film the plasma glow...

THEY WERE EXPECTING THIS...

They are not seen in visible light, but found on all NASA Infrared footage. Now ask yourself WHY is NASA filming in IR? And WHY does the cameraman follow the 'critters' if they are merely 'dust and debris"?


"Critters"
A Collection of Screen Captures from NASA Videos
UFO: Filmed During NASA Space Shuttle STS-80 Mission
http://www.thelivingmoon.com/41pegas...ritters04.html

Amoeba Like Life Forms
"Critters"
STS 75
http://www.thelivingmoon.com/41pegas.../Critters.html

The famous Tallahasee UFO

Possible UFO Footage Captured in Tallahassee

You will see the object changing shape like a jellyfish and begin to glow red INSIDE. The reddish glow moves around inside the grey transluscent one, then near the end it comes out and now there are two... the new one flittering around like a newborn.

I believe this to be a best case for critters video. It also is 10 minutes long... not the usual youtume 30 second clip

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0Nbik0F86vs

Stabalized at the moment before 'birth'
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZAnOGl-1rmw

Here is a better clip stabalized. You can see the changing shape and the red one clearly on the inside
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZxgyOdOROsY