10-15-2008, 08:46 PM
|
#9
|
Avalon Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 1,234
|
Re: Barry King British Whistleblower testimony
Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve_A
Hi THEWATCHER,
I can't vouch for everybody, but in the case of John Lear, he cites names and co-witnesses, is not ashamed to show off photographs, nor is he reserved about showing documents. Check out the videos on Project Camelot.
As I said in some posts earlier and you actually agreed with me, that one cannot accept everthing to be the truth, however, that which has been proven by another witness, with potographic evidence or documentational evidence needs to be at least accepted.
I think your videos on Youtube could have used the moment to show this sort of evidence.
The two I watched were of a guy in a field and a series of designs telling us to wait....
I'm sure that one doesn't need to be Einstein to do the math.
Best regards,
Steve
|
And perhaps you should not judge by a 9 or 10 minute edited videoclip either. These are from interviews which give much more data. I have named names, locations, agencies, project names and personnel, staff etc etc etc within the files themselves. From the guy whom was in charge to head of security and much more. Naming other individuals whom were involved too such as the guy whom was in charge of Porton Down at the time.So i did release much in the way of such data if you had this material to hand you would see. The trouble is here, people are making assumptions on seeing such a tiny piece of the testimony, which were all done ad hoc, spur of moment, arranged hastily by Miles Johnston from Sky TV. The original Bases 1 taped interview ran for 4 hours and was edited down to 3, then further edited to its state now of whatever length.
THE WATCHER AKA BMK
Last edited by THEWATCHER; 10-15-2008 at 08:50 PM.
|
|
|