Bill Deagle vs David Wilcock NOW WHAT?

undetected · 10-06-2008, 01:26 AM

There is no "Bill Deagle vs David Wilcock." If you think there is, you're standing too close. Seriously.

I'm pretty sure if they talked together [and maybe Bill & Kerry will make it happen?] they would agree on most things. Many people are misinterpreting the messages. Deagle didn't say "this is gonna happen," he said this is what he saw and it could happen but it can also be averted. Why don't people listen to the whole message? They start freaking out and make their opinion after the first 2 minutes and they don't hear the rest. Deagle does NOT bring fear as many people here claim. If you think he does, then you weren't listening to him.

Both guys are presenting info they have in the best way they can. You may disagree with their info or their way of presenting it, fine. But there's no need to condemn either of them or accuse them of various stuff just because you don't believe [one of] them.

All these Camelot witnesses are presenting information for you to consider. Use it any way you want. And if you disagree, maybe instead of saying "he's a fraud" or "he's full of sh*t" you could just leave them be and tell us what you believe. There is too much focus on the people instead of on the information.

10-06-2008, 01:26 AM	#11
undetected Avalon Senior Member Join Date: Sep 2008 Posts: 79	Bill Deagle + David Wilcock. NOW... move on There is no "Bill Deagle vs David Wilcock." If you think there is, you're standing too close. Seriously. I'm pretty sure if they talked together [and maybe Bill & Kerry will make it happen?] they would agree on most things. Many people are misinterpreting the messages. Deagle didn't say "this is gonna happen," he said this is what he saw and it could happen but it can also be averted. Why don't people listen to the whole message? They start freaking out and make their opinion after the first 2 minutes and they don't hear the rest. Deagle does NOT bring fear as many people here claim. If you think he does, then you weren't listening to him. Both guys are presenting info they have in the best way they can. You may disagree with their info or their way of presenting it, fine. But there's no need to condemn either of them or accuse them of various stuff just because you don't believe [one of] them. All these Camelot witnesses are presenting information for you to consider. Use it any way you want. And if you disagree, maybe instead of saying "he's a fraud" or "he's full of sh*t" you could just leave them be and tell us what you believe. There is too much focus on the people instead of on the information.