2 GREAT C2C Shows ~ Remote Viewing, ESP AND Forbidden Archaeology

[Majorion]

Originally Posted by Truthseeker512

Was a bit dissapointed with the Cremo interview. Didnt have much new to say at all. Dont you find with a lot of ppl on this circuit, they just repeat the same old stories. zzz.

It is often those people who share concrete evidence, back up their statements and conclusions with facts, and rarely speculate.

Your post is reflective of a very common mindset of many in these alternative communities, you always want to be told 'new stories' and get 'new information'. Has it ever occurred to you that the people who always share 'new' stuff are mostly making it up just for interviews documentaries and the like?

I could share a lot of stories with you if you like, but they are just stories, there may in fact be an element of truth (otherwise you'd never believe it), but most of it would be fictional spin, is that what you prefer, the spin?

[aroundthetable]

Originally Posted by Majorion

It is often those people who share concrete evidence, back up their statements and conclusions with facts, and rarely speculate.

Your post is reflective of a very common mindset of many in these alternative communities, you always want to be told 'new stories' and get 'new information'. Has it ever occurred to you that the people who always share 'new' stuff are mostly making it up just for interviews documentaries and the like?

Good observation Marjorion, Michael Cremo does have so much more he can share but we also have to remember that he is simply responding to the interviewers questions.

[Truthseeker512]

Originally Posted by Majorion

It is often those people who share concrete evidence, back up their statements and conclusions with facts, and rarely speculate.

Your post is reflective of a very common mindset of many in these alternative communities, you always want to be told 'new stories' and get 'new information'. Has it ever occurred to you that the people who always share 'new' stuff are mostly making it up just for interviews documentaries and the like?

I could share a lot of stories with you if you like, but they are just stories, there may in fact be an element of truth (otherwise you'd never believe it), but most of it would be fictional spin, is that what you prefer, the spin?

How very patronising.....
Does it make you feel good to patronise someone facelessly over the internet?
In answer to your question, yes of course it occured to me. Im not the idiot you seem to be suggesting I am. Im merely saying I was disapointed with the interview.
You have no idea what my mindset is quite clearly.
It isnt a bad emotion when someone feels disappointed because they were looking forward to learning something new, only not to.
How does being disapointed mean I want to hear made up disposable stories based on thin air.



Point is, there have been many many new discoveries in his field between the time of his last book and now which im sure he must know about.

The things he talked about on this show have been known for years by anyone truly interested in this topic. As a fringe researcher surly it would be better to point out even newer fringe discoveries.

There have been at least 2 history changing archaeological discoveries in the last few months. How about a 120 million yr old map. Thats right up his street isnt it?