The Heather Material

[Hiram]

I observe that what gets played out continuously on this forum, is a debate about the validity of various sources of information, various parties, personalities and agendas.

This is good and as it should be.

Yet we all have different standards of evidence, and what we consider sufficient to sway our minds one way or another. Some of us are convinced that all information, no matter how "out there" should be weighed evenly in ones mind.

But weighed against what?? What view of reality to you espouse? How does one measure the information that comes in every day against what one seems to KNOW intrinsically? Have some of us had experiences so extreme, so far past the bounds of what many humans would consider reality as to almost make these experiences inexpressible through words?

I think so. If thats the case you speak your truth simply, gently and purely. This is not a court, and you don't bring your experience here to be judged as factual or not. You are simply sharing with those who will listen.

Some people will not listen. Thus is life.

To expect the moderators, and Bill and Kerry to mediate this information with no personal preference, with no prejudice, and with no standards, is at best unrealistic and at worst is just not fair.

WE just ask that they endeavor to try.

[Reunite]

A very valid statement Hiram. Hearing both sides of the story does make one's discernment process easier.

For every truth there is an equal and opposite truth viewed from a different perspective and ultimate truth lies within and above all opposites and all contradictions.

[lightblue]

Derek do you know who runs the cassiopaeacult?

Vincent Bridges.

Do a little research on the guy and you'll find out why he is trying to discredit
Laura Knight-Jadczyk. There is always an agenda.

Here are a couple of links to get started.

http://www.cassiopaea.org/cass/clarification.htm

http://www.cassiopaea.com/Vincent_Br...NTELPRO_Agent/

Kerry's interview with Laura Knight-Jadczyk is actually one of the very few I look forward to.

That's a very good find Reunite...thanks.
bw l

[monique]

hiram, i agree whit you, i must control myself to not post all was i think because my english is poor and i can't discuss the theme. we must remember what you say, "this is not a court ..." - that is significant, very important, when come around declarations about the matter that concern the truth ! monique.

[Anchor]

Originally Posted by Hiram

To expect the moderators, and Bill and Kerry to mediate this information with no personal preference, with no prejudice, and with no standards, is at best unrealistic and at worst is just not fair.

WE just ask that they endeavor to try.

I agree with most of what you say.

I think Bill & Kerry's job is different to the moderators.

This is my personal position: the moderators are here to moderate the discussions and forum - to keep forum working within the established guidelines, and broadly on topic (thought that needs work).

Again in my opinion - the moderators are not here to judge truth from falsehood (except for the benefit of our personal reading) - in that regard I maintain we are no different from the non-moderators.

The implicit requests that we do act as judge have obviously been a challenge to this view and it has caused significant debate both on and off the forum. We will work through that, and like before, we will progress.

A..