Why hasn't Zecharia Sitchin been interviewed yet?

omshanti · 02-05-2010, 09:55 AM

possibly why sitchin was "pleased" with the veritas interview was because it was superficial and he was not challenged in any way by deep questioning. because sitchin is hard to get, interviewers seem to want to get on his "good" side. this equals a ho hum interview as far as i'm concerned.

there are many scholars who question the veracity of sitchin's findings. i am interested in his jewish links and possible links to secret sects. yes, i also recall the david icke interview whereby sitchin was seen to shape shift. he was not a high ranking member of the group as i recall.

there is also suggestion that his prolific writings are aided by channelled info.
he uses the pronoun "we" instead of "i" when explaining his theories...
we think/we suggest/

anton parks (french) has more breadth and insight in relation to sumerian clay tablet findings as well a more detailed account of et races.
sitchin has certainly opened up portals for deep discussion, but i do feel he is pulling many veils and is not an independent agent.
any researcher needs to be flexible, wiling to allow new ideas to emerge. sitchin's ego is fixed. he seems to view others as less. he takes a very patriarchal stand which is why, perhaps, the sumerian wars and tales of king and conquering appeal...the "cute" old man does not work for me.

02-05-2010, 09:55 AM	#21
omshanti Avalon Senior Member Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: Australia Posts: 30	Re: Why hasn't Zecharia Sitchin been interviewed yet? possibly why sitchin was "pleased" with the veritas interview was because it was superficial and he was not challenged in any way by deep questioning. because sitchin is hard to get, interviewers seem to want to get on his "good" side. this equals a ho hum interview as far as i'm concerned. there are many scholars who question the veracity of sitchin's findings. i am interested in his jewish links and possible links to secret sects. yes, i also recall the david icke interview whereby sitchin was seen to shape shift. he was not a high ranking member of the group as i recall. there is also suggestion that his prolific writings are aided by channelled info. he uses the pronoun "we" instead of "i" when explaining his theories... we think/we suggest/ anton parks (french) has more breadth and insight in relation to sumerian clay tablet findings as well a more detailed account of et races. sitchin has certainly opened up portals for deep discussion, but i do feel he is pulling many veils and is not an independent agent. any researcher needs to be flexible, wiling to allow new ideas to emerge. sitchin's ego is fixed. he seems to view others as less. he takes a very patriarchal stand which is why, perhaps, the sumerian wars and tales of king and conquering appeal...the "cute" old man does not work for me.