Cliff High view on Bill Ryans accusations

cantaloupe · 12-17-2009, 02:53 AM

Evidence first. Gut second. Deagle offers no evidence, and I always feel horrible and scared after listening to him.
Moses indeed. Everyone who says anything publicly upon which they would have others base their actions in these interesting times should be held to scrutiny,
and be able to withstand it. Duh. I'm with Cliff High on this. Perhaps less volume and more hard hitting research would benefit Camelot. Correlation of witness testimonies is but one method of verification (the only one Camelot seems to be using regularly) and it is not foolproof, due to the commonplace phenomenon of people being willing to conspire with one another. I've listened to a lot of cr@p there, among the nuggets of what I think might be good info. Bill Ryan is willing to discount Patrick Geryl's take because of his lack of spiritual orientation or something to that effect but takes the wild and fantastical tales and predictions of Deagle, Green, Burisch et al., almost wholesale. Where's the discernment there? Even after Burisch's strange betrayal, that timeline malarky is still floated as if there were any way to verify it at all. There has to be a balance between being able to get people to talk and having to accept the mutton stew of Camelot's material.
Ooh, I'm a senior member.

12-17-2009, 02:53 AM	#33
cantaloupe Avalon Senior Member Join Date: Sep 2008 Posts: 151	Re: Cliff High view on Bill Ryans accusations Evidence first. Gut second. Deagle offers no evidence, and I always feel horrible and scared after listening to him. Moses indeed. Everyone who says anything publicly upon which they would have others base their actions in these interesting times should be held to scrutiny, and be able to withstand it. Duh. I'm with Cliff High on this. Perhaps less volume and more hard hitting research would benefit Camelot. Correlation of witness testimonies is but one method of verification (the only one Camelot seems to be using regularly) and it is not foolproof, due to the commonplace phenomenon of people being willing to conspire with one another. I've listened to a lot of cr@p there, among the nuggets of what I think might be good info. Bill Ryan is willing to discount Patrick Geryl's take because of his lack of spiritual orientation or something to that effect but takes the wild and fantastical tales and predictions of Deagle, Green, Burisch et al., almost wholesale. Where's the discernment there? Even after Burisch's strange betrayal, that timeline malarky is still floated as if there were any way to verify it at all. There has to be a balance between being able to get people to talk and having to accept the mutton stew of Camelot's material. Ooh, I'm a senior member. Last edited by cantaloupe; 12-17-2009 at 07:57 PM.