Norway...possible portal? UFO?

Lionhawk · 12-10-2009, 05:12 AM

Quote (Originally by GoingToFast)
One thing that bothers me with thees pictures is that they are in a very high quality, I get a feeling that this is a "Professional Photographer" standing at attention with a high quality camera at a "good spot" for best result - they are just so perfectly "glossy" and "shining" - Who is the Photographer??

http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage...in-a-spin.html
---End Quote---

Maybe you should reconsider this post above I made before.

What if they knew in advance that the Russians was going to make the missile launch and made the missile fail somehow and had photographers on strategic places for good "kill-shots" of the event gone wrong, or maby they didn't make the missile fail but had photographers out just in case the missile would fail, just to make the Russians look bad during the Nobel Prize and the Climate Summit.... think about it for a second....
***************
This isn't personal but.....

It would also stand to reason that the quality of cameras have increased in these last few years. I don't think people are still walking around with the older Kodak or Polaroids. The last I looked we were in the range of topping out at 22 megapixels and I know many cameras now a days run at least 10 megapixels. So I don't buy that angle. Also if you just stand back and look at it, there are several things going on at once to simply say a rocket did this. That argument is very flawed considering all the rockets or missiles that have been launched have never created this effect. How do you explain away the spiral backdrop? And if you look at the halo you can see it tear drop towards the impact location. As the blue light also tightens up it's pattern. That shows another effect is compressing the spiral light. If it was a rocket that went hay wire, that would also be indicated by various particles emanating away in abstract directions. Instead we see three different effects going on in unison. Also if you notice the spiral of the wormhole is going in the same direction as our galaxy does. If I was a skeptic, I would argue it was a hologram and not a rocket. The spiral is to tightly organized at the wormhole event horizon and would have a lot of chaotic anomalies constantly changing especially if you look at the size of this thing. It's way huge and also distant. But the patterns are in a holding pattern considering the distance. Rocket But that is my opinion but I also welcome any healthy debate as to solving this. Anyone can say what they want but it is another when it's one thing to tell me it is raining when you are only peeing on my foot.

BROOK · 12-10-2009, 05:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lionhawk

It would also stand to reason that the quality of cameras have increased in these last few years. I don't think people are still walking around with the older Kodak or Polaroids. The last I looked we were in the range of topping out at 22 megapixels and I know many cameras now a days run at least 10 megapixels. So I don't buy that angle. Also if you just stand back and look at it, there are several things going on at once to simply say a rocket did this. That argument is very flawed considering all the rockets or missiles that have been launched have never created this effect. How do you explain away the spiral backdrop? And if you look at the halo you can see it tear drop towards the impact location. As the blue light also tightens up it's pattern. That shows another effect is compressing the spiral light. If it was a rocket that went hay wire, that would also be indicated by various particles emanating away in abstract directions. Instead we see three different effects going on in unison. Also if you notice the spiral of the wormhole is going in the same direction as our galaxy does. If I was a skeptic, I would argue it was a hologram and not a rocket. The spiral is to tightly organized at the wormhole event horizon and would have a lot of chaotic anomalies constantly changing especially if you look at the size of this thing. It's way huge and also distant. But the patterns are in a holding pattern considering the distance. Rocket But that is my opinion but I also welcome any healthy debate as to solving this. Anyone can say what they want but it is another when it's one thing to tell me it is raining when you are only peeing on my foot.

Someone get Lionhawk some new shoes please......hahahaha

Lionhawk · 12-10-2009, 05:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BROOK

Someone get Lionhawk some new shoes please......hahahaha

Good thing I wasn't wearing my moccasins.

12-10-2009, 05:12 AM	#1
Lionhawk Avalon Senior Member Join Date: Sep 2009 Location: Sol, Terra 3, Florida, USA Posts: 329	Re: Norway...possible portal? UFO? Quote (Originally by GoingToFast) One thing that bothers me with thees pictures is that they are in a very high quality, I get a feeling that this is a "Professional Photographer" standing at attention with a high quality camera at a "good spot" for best result - they are just so perfectly "glossy" and "shining" - Who is the Photographer?? http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage...in-a-spin.html ---End Quote--- Maybe you should reconsider this post above I made before. What if they knew in advance that the Russians was going to make the missile launch and made the missile fail somehow and had photographers on strategic places for good "kill-shots" of the event gone wrong, or maby they didn't make the missile fail but had photographers out just in case the missile would fail, just to make the Russians look bad during the Nobel Prize and the Climate Summit.... think about it for a second.... *************** This isn't personal but..... It would also stand to reason that the quality of cameras have increased in these last few years. I don't think people are still walking around with the older Kodak or Polaroids. The last I looked we were in the range of topping out at 22 megapixels and I know many cameras now a days run at least 10 megapixels. So I don't buy that angle. Also if you just stand back and look at it, there are several things going on at once to simply say a rocket did this. That argument is very flawed considering all the rockets or missiles that have been launched have never created this effect. How do you explain away the spiral backdrop? And if you look at the halo you can see it tear drop towards the impact location. As the blue light also tightens up it's pattern. That shows another effect is compressing the spiral light. If it was a rocket that went hay wire, that would also be indicated by various particles emanating away in abstract directions. Instead we see three different effects going on in unison. Also if you notice the spiral of the wormhole is going in the same direction as our galaxy does. If I was a skeptic, I would argue it was a hologram and not a rocket. The spiral is to tightly organized at the wormhole event horizon and would have a lot of chaotic anomalies constantly changing especially if you look at the size of this thing. It's way huge and also distant. But the patterns are in a holding pattern considering the distance. Rocket But that is my opinion but I also welcome any healthy debate as to solving this. Anyone can say what they want but it is another when it's one thing to tell me it is raining when you are only peeing on my foot. Last edited by Lionhawk; 12-10-2009 at 05:32 AM.