|
|
|
|
|
#1 | |
|
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Earth
Posts: 197
|
Quote:
In that instance, just twitch your left eye a couple of times, jerk your right shoulder, look at them with a blank face and say: "They're coming". That should get rid of them pretty quickly. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Avalon Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: BC. Canada
Posts: 1,340
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Avalon Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 3,201
|
Would love to try this. I need a new camera anyway.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Sorry but for 150-300USD all you get is c**p...after the XXX% zoom on the PC all u see are strange "spots"...that actually could be anything.... It is something you can not show to a randomly selected person (post on the internet) - it is not good enough.
It is similar to telescopes when they offer you cheap s*** with "awesome" zoom...a c**p telescope. A sufficient amateur telescope (something for the beginner) is around 2000EUR. The same goes for camera..depends on what you want to do with it... |
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Earth
Posts: 197
|
Quote:
![]() But seriously, Spregovori, most people have those $150 to $300 cameras. I am showing people how to maximize their chance of capturing something "decent" with that kind of camera. If you have a better camera, there's no reason you can't try what I have explained above. As a matter of fact, I would URGE you to. Your pictures will most assuredly be of a much higher quality. But also, I insist that there is A LOT of activity beginning to appear that these cheaper cameras WILL pick up. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
People (Tone3) for example...said that they are in 4+th density = we can not see them... So I can have a 10K telescope but will not see anything.
I was actually considering into buying a telescope or a photo camera... With a nice scope and equatorial "legs" one should be able to see wonders since so many people say there is a lot of happening up there... (yet non of the amateur astronomers are reporting it) At this moment I have the "extra" money to do it (buy) but my situation (I do not have my own living space) can change at any given time...and if/when that comes...there will be no extra money.... |
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Earth
Posts: 197
|
So, basically, you've responded to contradict the thread?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I responded to "inform" (not sure that is the best word) or to express opinion that using trotl cameras wont bring satisfying results..(and it can even repel people)...especially not for someone that is inside the box - the people that either are willing to listen but would like to see "more" and the people that are not willing to listen but would be willing to see actual footage - clear, big, nice, long, evident, mesmerizing, not fake...something that is not a small dot somewhere up the sky or a video looking like the eye sight of someone that spend the whole night drinking and of "something" in the video that is to be the ufo....etc
or I could use my persuade-tron beam on them....it will have the same effect = 0 But if you do it for fun and/or out of curiosity it can be done with any kind of camera...
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
Avalon Administrator
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: North of 45° in Canada
Posts: 511
|
Quote:
you're funny I am curious now. I will try this with my lil 400$ camera this weekend and I will post anything odd I find. cool thread.
__________________
Richard "For those with their eyes shut, no explanation will suffice. For those with their eyes open, no explanation is necessary." Click here to chat LIVE with other members of Avalon |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Avalon Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Weymouth, Dorset, UK
Posts: 827
|
I have an old youtube video somewhere in my backup that has a guy telling about different filters to fit to a camera to show some strange stuff. He claimed that these creatures flying in the video where all around us....
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Earth
Posts: 197
|
Quote:
So, I went outside set my camera as I explained above and started taking pictures. I came inside and: This was in the first set of pictures So, I went outside at the same time again for another tow days, and I got: All of these Note: I couldn't see them with my eyes. I was just taking random pictures of the blue sky above. It was a perfect blue sky though. Sp, considering that this is the first and only time I have tried to take any pictures and I got over 30, I am now convinced that there's so many things up there, that if more people do this also -- MUCH better objects are bound to show up. I am quite sure about that. I might go out for an hour or so, each day, for another three days or so very soon. I'm sure I will get more cool pictures of "weirs stuff" that obviously isn't swamp gas or balloons. Mind you, I spend a LOT of time outside at night, just standing and looking up. I don't know why, but I just love to do it. I have seen MANY objects in the sky. I have also seen more than one at a time. There's stuff up there - never you mind about that. You just have to look. And if you're looking in the first place, there's no harm taking a few photos as well. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 | ||
|
Avalon Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Australia
Posts: 2,570
|
Quote:
I've been thinking about this for years. You have inspired me to actually get out there with my camera and do it. Next time am tuned in and I feel the impulse I will take some shots and I will keep repeating that process until I have something to post here. Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Avalon Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Weymouth, Dorset, UK
Posts: 827
|
Lmao, im going to sound like a right nunky but, i just took random photos in my garden.
FAF, i got something, and i am being seious here. |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Earth
Posts: 197
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Avalon Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Weymouth, Dorset, UK
Posts: 827
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Avalon Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Australia
Posts: 2,570
|
Nice one!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Earth
Posts: 197
|
Nice. Take some more
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Avalon Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Weymouth, Dorset, UK
Posts: 827
|
LMAO, i cant believe I went and did that, but hey, take my hat off M1, im impresed. Good method, albeit, random.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Earth
Posts: 197
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Avalon Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Weymouth, Dorset, UK
Posts: 827
|
Anyone out there with decent enhancement software, if so fancy dicepting it???
|
|
|
|
|
|
#21 | |
|
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Earth
Posts: 197
|
Quote:
If you want a batter picture, what I would suggest is to keep trying until something pops up "closer". There are OFTEN things popping in and out of the sky which are there for a split second (and you wont see it with your eyes), but if your camera happens to snap it at that split second, you will capture it. Also, you will very likely capture pictures of rods. I have one picture of a rod. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
Avalon Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Weymouth, Dorset, UK
Posts: 827
|
Full Zoom??
This was taken with no zoom optical or otherwise. |
|
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Earth
Posts: 197
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
Avalon Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Weymouth, Dorset, UK
Posts: 827
|
little mountains, lol
The settings were: 9mp at normal Exp 1/480 sec @ f/2.8 focal length 6.2mm iso 200 dimentions 3488 x 2616 set on auto Fuji finepix S9500 |
|
|
|
|
|
#25 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Earth
Posts: 197
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|