Illuminati Reveal Crazy Apocalyptic Agenda:hidden hand dissection.

[Carol]

I did listen to David channeling the RA material and all I have to say is that it is no different then many others who channeled, including myself many years ago, and I don't trust any of it.

If he were to say this is being channeled from my higher consciousness, then yes. But to attribute it to another disembodied entity and to turn over ones consciousness to something else is just plain dangerous. Even Raylyn of Rumer Mill News thought she was channeling in higher beings messages for years only to discover later she had been a victim of miltiary mind control experiments.

Channeling may start out okay - but there are deeper questions which must be addressed and those pertain to individual soverignty and the role human consciousness must play in its own spiritual development. Another question that pops to mind is ego... and how many channelers are just channeling unconscious material from an ego driven desire to be special. Is that information to be trusted?

Perhaps because I'm ancient and have seen this for so many years close up and personal my opinion may not fit with others here. However, if someone tells me channeling is involved - my interest just turns off.

[Jonathon]

Actually Carol, Ra IS David's higher self. He has mentioned this many times.

[Anchor]

Originally Posted by Jonathon

Actually Carol, Ra IS David's higher self. He has mentioned this many times.

Well to be precise, a individial part of the overall social memory complex at any rate.

You'd might be surprised at how many of Ra there are on the planet right now

A..

[Phtha]

Well we are on the subject of the Ra materials, this is one quote that caught my eye right of the bat, from the first session:

'Ra: I am Ra. We communicate now. We, too, have our place. We are not those of the Love or of the Light. We are those who are of the Law of One. In our vibration the polarities are harmonized; the complexities are simplified; and the paradoxes have their solution. We are one. That is our nature and our purpose.'

The law of one is great and I have high respect for it, but I am of light and love, they just feel to right, at least here on this 3rd D. And light and love seems to be the only feelings I project that are able to take my awareness away to other spaces at times. I wonder who are these beings of Love and Light that Ra mentioned that are not of, any guesses?

BTw for those interested, I'm uploading all the Ra materials in audio on my youtube channel. Have a listen if you like.

[Jonathon]

Originally Posted by Anchor

Well to be precise, a individial part of the overall social memory complex at any rate.

You'd might be surprised at how many of Ra there are on the planet right now

A..

Quite right Anchor - thanks for clarifying.

Ptha - so interesting that you are converting the Law of One to audio. I just thought about doing that today myself! Now I don't have to!

[dolphin]

Originally Posted by Carol

I did listen to David channeling the RA material and all I have to say is that it is no different then many others who channeled, including myself many years ago, and I don't trust any of it.

If he were to say this is being channeled from my higher consciousness, then yes. But to attribute it to another disembodied entity and to turn over ones consciousness to something else is just plain dangerous. Even Raylyn of Rumer Mill News thought she was channeling in higher beings messages for years only to discover later she had been a victim of miltiary mind control experiments.

Channeling may start out okay - but there are deeper questions which must be addressed and those pertain to individual soverignty and the role human consciousness must play in its own spiritual development. Another question that pops to mind is ego... and how many channelers are just channeling unconscious material from an ego driven desire to be special. Is that information to be trusted?

Perhaps because I'm ancient and have seen this for so many years close up and personal my opinion may not fit with others here. However, if someone tells me channeling is involved - my interest just turns off.

carol, i couldn't agree w you more...great points. for one, i don't believe as wilcock says he's the reincarnation of cayce...so if he's misleading people on such a HUGE statement, then i can't give any credence to the law of one or him channeling RA...he's misguided, and some ego issues are involved. as carol put it, i don't trust his claims.

[Jonathon]

Originally Posted by dolphin

carol, i couldn't agree w you more...great points. for one, i don't believe as wilcock says he's the reincarnation of cayce...so if he's misleading people on such a HUGE statement, then i can't give any credence to the law of one or him channeling RA...he's misguided, and some ego issues are involved. as carol put it, i don't trust his claims.

Hi Dolphin!

You don't believe that he is the reincarnation of Cayce, but you do not know for sure. You also don't know that he is misleading, misguided or whether he has ego issues, for these are attached to the affirmative of the 1st statement. His work and the Law of One material stand on their own merits and do not require anyone's particular belief to be of great value. Really a lot of fantastic work that you are putting a wall around due to some assumption that you have made that could very well be wrong. If that's OK with you, then of course it is your choice, however I would urge you to open your mind and explore it. You won't regret it.

"Do not believe in anything simply because you have heard it. Do not believe in anything simply because it is spoken and rumored by many. Do not believe in anything because it is found written in your religious books. Do not believe in anything merely on authority of your teachers and elders. Do not believe in traditions because they have been handed down for many generations. But after observation and analysis, when you find anything that agrees with reason and is conducive to the good and benefit of one and all, then accept it and live up to it." Siddhartha Guatama (The Buddha)