Go Back   Old Project Avalon Forum (ARCHIVE) > Project Avalon Forum > Global Ground Crew Networking > United States

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-05-2009, 10:07 PM   #1
orthodoxymoron
Avalon Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Lunar Base II
Posts: 3,093
Default Re: The US Constitution

In the video documentary 'Ring of Power' http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yj0cu...eature=related the following assertion is made: 'The flag of the Washington District of Columbia has three red stars. One for each city state in the empire. This empire rules the world economically through London's "City", militarily by the District of Columbia, and spiritually by the Vatican. The Constitution for the District of Columbia operates under a tyrannical Roman law known as the lex fori and has no similarities to the U.S. Constitution'. http://www.newciv.org/nl/newslog.php...308-000266.htm Another 'Ring of Power' assertion is that 'When Congress passed the Act of 1871 it created a separate corporate government for the District of Columbia. This treasonous act allowed the District of Columbia to operate as a corporation outside the original constitution of the United States and outside of the best interest of American citizens.' The following are links which touch on the subject of this thread.
I am neither confirming or denying the validity or accuracy of the links.
http://greyfalcon.us/The%20Empire%20Never%20Ended.htm
http://www.luisprada.com/Protected/s...heir_power.htm
http://home.earthlink.net/~walterk1/...S/USPagan.html
http://www.theconspiracyexplained.com/USA.html
http://www.rense.com/general74/vattt.htm
http://www.newciv.org/nl/newslog.php...308-000266.htm
http://www.nps.gov/nr/travel/wash/dc76.htm
http://www.aoc.gov
http://www.senate.gov
http://www.flickr.com/search/?q=Capi...ss&w=all&s=int
http://dc.about.com/cs/walkingtours/a/Capitol.htm
http://www.flickr.com/search/?s=int&...+inside&m=text

Last edited by orthodoxymoron; 05-06-2009 at 12:48 AM.
orthodoxymoron is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-05-2009, 11:31 PM   #2
Seashore
Avalon Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 3,564
Default Re: The US Constitution

Quote:
Originally Posted by orthodoxymoron View Post
The flag of the Washington District of Columbia has three red stars. One for each city state in the empire. This empire rules the world economically through London's "City", militarily by the District of Columbia, and spiritually by the Vatican. The Constitution for the District of Columbia operates under a tyrannical Roman law known as the lex fori and has no similarities to the U.S. Constitution.
orthodoxymoron,

Is the above quote your own assertions or are you quoting the video here?

Quote:
Originally Posted by orthodoxymoron View Post
In the above link, who or what is the "Z X C"? And beginning with the sixth paragraph, there are quotation marks but it doesn't say who is being quoted. Do you know? Is this site a blog that you're familiar with?
Seashore is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-06-2009, 12:36 AM   #3
orthodoxymoron
Avalon Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Lunar Base II
Posts: 3,093
Default Re: The US Constitution

Quote:
Originally Posted by seashore View Post
orthodoxymoron,

Is the above quote your own assertions or are you quoting the video here?

In the above link, who or what is the "Z X C"? And beginning with the sixth paragraph, there are quotation marks but it doesn't say who is being quoted. Do you know? Is this site a blog that you're familiar with?

Just quoting the 'Ring of Power' video which we were discussing. No...I simply copied and pasted the links. Here is one more, which may or may not, have a bearing on sovereignty and the Constitution: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cCMNu1ToWPA.

Last edited by orthodoxymoron; 05-06-2009 at 01:09 AM.
orthodoxymoron is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-06-2009, 03:30 AM   #4
orthodoxymoron
Avalon Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Lunar Base II
Posts: 3,093
Default Re: The US Constitution

Here is yet another link: http://www.byronwine.com/files/1871.pdf. It is a discussion of the 1871 issue...which I don't necessarily endorse. I'm just passing it on. This isn't my issue. Actually...I'm much more interested in Constructive Competition, Positive Response Ability, and Constitutional Responsible Freedom...as it relates to the U.S. Constitution. I'm more interested in reading the Federalist Papers and Anti-Federalist Papers...and learning more about the founding of the United States and the formulation of the Constitution. I'm more interested in constitutional law and in how the Constitution is applied each and every day. I don't know a lot about all of the above...but I am making progress. Here is a positive approach to the Constitution: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mY5vO...eature=related.

Last edited by orthodoxymoron; 05-06-2009 at 04:12 AM.
orthodoxymoron is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-06-2009, 05:24 AM   #5
Seashore
Avalon Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 3,564
Default Re: The US Constitution

Quote:
Originally Posted by orthodoxymoron View Post
Here is yet another link: http://www.byronwine.com/files/1871.pdf. It is a discussion of the 1871 issue...
And here's a different link:

The United States Isn't a Country — It's a Corporation! by Lisa Guliani

Lisa states:

"...The date is February 21, 1871 and the Forty-First Congress is in session. I refer you to the "Acts of the Forty-First Congress," Section 34, Session III, chapters 61 and 62. On this date in the history of our nation, Congress passed an Act titled: "An Act To Provide A Government for the District of Columbia." This is also known as the "Act of 1871." What does this mean? Well, it means that Congress, under no constitutional authority to do so, created a separate form of government for the District of Columbia, which is a ten mile square parcel of land....

In essence, this Act formed the corporation known as THE UNITED STATES. Note the capitalization, because it is important. This corporation, owned by foreign interests, moved right in and shoved the original "organic" version of the Constitution into a dusty corner. With the "Act of 1871," our Constitution was defaced in the sense that the title was block-capitalized and the word "for" was changed to the word "of" in the title. The original Constitution drafted by the Founding Fathers, was written in this manner:

'The Constitution for the united states of America'.

The altered version reads: "THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA". It is the corporate constitution. It is NOT the same document you might think it is. The corporate constitution operates in an economic capacity and has been used to fool the People into thinking it is the same parchment that governs the Republic. It absolutely is not."

_______________________________________________

I found a link to the actual legislation:

American Memory

The author Lisa must be mistaken when she says "Acts of the Forty-First Congress," Section 34... because I see that "Sections" are subtitles of a "Chapter," not a "Congress." (There is a Section 34 of chapter 62, however.)

Also, chapter 61 (pages 417 - 419) is entitled "Consular and Diplomatic Expenses Appropriation," so I don't know why she includes it.

Additionally, I see from the index that chapter 60 is missing.

Here is a copy of that index page:



Here is a copy of the first page of the legislation, which is too long to post (pages 419 - 429). It begins half way down the page:



Here is a copy of the Section 34 of chapter 62. It appears to be unrelated to the issue:



I'm thinking that what this author Lisa Guliani must be saying is that subsequent to this legislation, our Constitution title changed to all capital letters, indicating corporate status. She says the Constitution originally read "The Constitution for the united states of America" and now it reads "THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA." I wonder whether we can verify this...

David Icke writes about the significance of names written in all caps...

Hmmm...

_______________________________________________


Additional research: A direct response to Lisa's assertions, by G. Edward Griffin

Last edited by Seashore; 05-06-2009 at 05:20 PM. Reason: Add information
Seashore is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-06-2009, 06:52 AM   #6
Malynda
Avalon Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 250
Default Re: The US Constitution

Quote:
Originally Posted by orthodoxymoron View Post
Just quoting the 'Ring of Power' video which we were discussing. No...I simply copied and pasted the links. Here is one more, which may or may not, have a bearing on sovereignty and the Constitution: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cCMNu1ToWPA.

Now that was a trippy video. Sure looks like a grey but who knows with all the tricks you can do. Does make me go "hmmm" though.
Malynda is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-06-2009, 07:13 AM   #7
orthodoxymoron
Avalon Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Lunar Base II
Posts: 3,093
Default Re: The US Constitution

I'm just trying to sample a lot of different things and points of view...but not get bogged down on any one thing...or take anything too seriously. Here is yet another viewpoint on Washington D.C. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eynHq...eature=related.
orthodoxymoron is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-06-2009, 07:22 AM   #8
Malynda
Avalon Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 250
Default Re: The US Constitution

Quote:
Originally Posted by orthodoxymoron View Post
I'm just trying to sample a lot of different things and points of view...but not get bogged down on any one thing...or take anything too seriously. Here is yet another viewpoint on Washington D.C. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eynHq...eature=related.
I've been living with eyes wide shut. Thanks for that interesting video. I'm with you. I look at lots of different points of view but am not necessarily buying into anything. It just helps to clear out the cobwebs and make me more aware.
Malynda is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-06-2009, 05:01 PM   #9
orthodoxymoron
Avalon Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Lunar Base II
Posts: 3,093
Default Re: The US Constitution

seashore: Nice job researching. I would need to hear constitutional lawyers or university professors or seasoned researchers debate the issue of constitutional corruption. Everything needs to be reexamined in a rational manner. We have taken a lot of things for granted...and trusted a lot of people and institutions in an unquestioning way. This is obviously changing. I just hope and pray that when we throw out the bathwater...we don't throw out the baby as well. Forums such as Avalon may help us to arrive at correct conclusions...and achieve appropriate responses.
orthodoxymoron is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-08-2009, 04:28 PM   #10
orthodoxymoron
Avalon Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Lunar Base II
Posts: 3,093
Default Re: The US Constitution

Just Following Orders vs Responding Responsibly

Last edited by orthodoxymoron; 05-08-2009 at 04:30 PM.
orthodoxymoron is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-11-2009, 02:14 PM   #11
Seashore
Avalon Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 3,564
Default Re: The US Constitution

"Even more shocking to many Americans is the notion that the Bill of Rights is intended to protect our rights from officials and personnel of the federal government...

Our American ancestors were easily able to avoid conflating the federal government and the private sector. They had learned an important lesson from history and from personal experience, a lesson that unfortunately has been lost on many modern-day Americans: the greatest threat to the freedom and well-being of a citizenry lies not with foreigners but rather with their own government, especially a government with a large standing military force... "

These quotes are taken from an essay entitled "Do We Still Need the Bill of Rights? by Jacob G. Hornberger, Posted December 10, 2008.
Seashore is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-13-2009, 11:30 PM   #12
Seashore
Avalon Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 3,564
Default Re: The US Constitution

Here is a website that I discovered today: Freedom.org (now Freedom21.org).



They are announcing a conference to be held in Oklahoma August 13 - 15, 2009 entitled "The Growing American Tyranny and How to Stop It"...


Last edited by Seashore; 05-14-2009 at 01:51 AM.
Seashore is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-17-2009, 09:21 PM   #13
peaceandlove
Avalon Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Turtle Island
Posts: 2,776
Default Re: The US Constitution

Seattle Regional Conference Fliers

Campaign for Liberty Conference Memorial Weekend

Posted by Matt Hawes on 05/15/09 4:52 PM

It's hard to believe that May is halfway over and next weekend is Memorial Day Weekend! We're excited about our upcoming Regional Conference in Seattle and are looking forward to a great time of inspiration, training, and networking.

We've added a couple of fliers about the event to our "Handouts" section to help those of you in the Northwest area spread the word about the Conference.

This flier emphasizes our free and open to the public Freedom Celebration with Dr. Paul and Tom Woods (taking place on Friday, May 22):



And thanks to Michael Nystrom over at the Daily Paul for allowing us to add his great fliers.



Get the full-size version here, and click here for a smaller, four-to-a-page PDF.

Check out our Seattle Regional Conference event page for full agenda, registration, sponsorship, hotel, and travel details. If you are unable to make it out, consider sponsoring a student to attend.

EVENT INFORMATION PAGE: http://www.campaignforliberty.com/event/2009seattle.php

Source for article and links within article: http://www.campaignforliberty.com/bl...cpg=1#comments
peaceandlove is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-18-2009, 04:30 PM   #14
TtC
Avalon Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 103
Default Re: The US Constitution

I bet very, few if any, of you actually know that the the Constitution is not a legally binding contract and has, when brought up in a court of law, been thrown out because it is not legally binding. It only ever applied to those people who were alive at the time of its writing and were asked if they chose to live by it. Do you know why government exists? What is its purpose?

Even the foundation upon which the United States is based is a farce, but people still believe they have standing based on it.
TtC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-18-2009, 08:17 PM   #15
Seashore
Avalon Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 3,564
Default Re: The US Constitution

Quote:
Originally Posted by TtC View Post

I bet very, few if any, of you actually know that the the Constitution is not a legally binding contract and has, when brought up in a court of law, been thrown out because it is not legally binding. It only ever applied to those people who were alive at the time of its writing and were asked if they chose to live by it. Do you know why government exists? What is its purpose?

Even the foundation upon which the United States is based is a farce, but people still believe they have standing based on it.
Please elaborate on this. Can you give an example of a court case? And what do you mean the foundation is a farce? How so? Do you remember where you got these ideas from? A book, or article, or something?
Seashore is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-24-2009, 10:20 PM   #16
Seashore
Avalon Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 3,564
Default Re: The US Constitution

On another thread I read the phrase the "masonic constitution," and because I've seen discussions about the founding fathers being mostly masons, I googled this to see what I could find.

I found a website that lists the signers of the Constitution and whether or not they were Freemasons. I see that James Madison, considered the father of the Constitution, is listed as "no evidence of Masonic membership."

Also of interest is that the site says only 33% of the signers were masons--not the majority as is often alleged.

Here's what the page on the website states:

"Freemasons & the U.S. Constitution

The purpose of this webpage is to present information about Freemasons and the U.S. Constitution. Most of the information comes from a booklet, Masonic Membership of the Signers of the Constitution of the United States, published by the Masonic Service Association, and written by Bro. Ronald E. Heaton. It was originally published in 1962, reprinted in 1986.

Please feel free to contact me with information, suggestions, or corrections about the information on this site. You can contact me by clicking on my name: Paul M. Bessel."

He states in his biography on the site that he is a Freemason and lists his Freemason history.

Here's the link:

http://bessel.org/constmas.htm

Last edited by Seashore; 05-25-2009 at 02:39 AM. Reason: Add link to the other thread
Seashore is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-06-2009, 01:07 AM   #17
Seashore
Avalon Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 3,564
Default Re: The US Constitution

Quote:
Originally Posted by orthodoxymoron View Post
In the video documentary 'Ring of Power' http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yj0cu...eature=related the following assertion is made: 'The flag of the Washington District of Columbia has three red stars. One for each city state in the empire. This empire rules the world economically through London's "City", militarily by the District of Columbia, and spiritually by the Vatican. The Constitution for the District of Columbia operates under a tyrannical Roman law known as the lex fori and has no similarities to the U.S. Constitution'. http://www.newciv.org/nl/newslog.php...308-000266.htm
Did you insert the link to the newslog to show that the "Constitution" for the District of Columbia alleged in the video is actually the Act of 1871? Because I see no reference to a Constitution for the District of Columbia in the newslog post. And this is important. Let's leave the corporation status out of the discussion for the present. I'm interested in the allegation of a separate Constitution for the District of Columbia that bears no resemblance to the US Constitution...
Seashore is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-06-2009, 01:47 AM   #18
orthodoxymoron
Avalon Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Lunar Base II
Posts: 3,093
Default Re: The US Constitution

Quote:
Originally Posted by seashore View Post
Did you insert the link to the newslog to show that the "Constitution" for the District of Columbia alleged in the video is actually the Act of 1871? Because I see no reference to a Constitution for the District of Columbia in the newslog post. And this is important. Let's leave the corporation status out of the discussion for the present. I'm interested in the allegation of a separate Constitution for the District of Columbia that bears no resemblance to the US Constitution...
No...the link was present in the material which I copied and pasted: http://www.lanksamling.se/blogg/eng3kronstater.html No quotation marks were originally present...and I did not realize that it was a quote from 'Ring of Power' until you inquired about it. Your desire to not discuss the corporation status issue is understandable. I feel no particular need to examine this potentially important issue presently. Regarding a constitution for the District of Columbia...this could be a misstatement by 'Ring of Power'. It may have been an inference that the U.S. Constitution could be vetoed by Lex Fori...which might imply that a U.S. President could be ordered to act in an unconstitutional manner by an individual, court, or organization outside of Washington D.C...or even outside of the United States. This, of course, is merely conjecture...and the subject is in need of further study. The only reference I could locate regarding a Washington D.C. constitution was in a chronology which I found on narpac.org http://www.narpac.org/ITXDCHIS.HTM :

November 4, 1980: District electors approve the District of Columbia Statehood Constitutional Convention of 1979, which became D.C. Law 3-171 and which called for convening a state constitutional convention.

November 2, 1982: After the constitutional convention, a Constitution for the State of New Columbia is ratified by District voters.

Last edited by orthodoxymoron; 05-06-2009 at 02:11 AM.
orthodoxymoron is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-06-2009, 02:33 AM   #19
Seashore
Avalon Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 3,564
Default Re: The US Constitution

Quote:
Originally Posted by orthodoxymoron View Post
The only reference I could locate regarding a Washington D.C. constitution was in a chronology which I found on narpac.org http://www.narpac.org/ITXDCHIS.HTM :

November 4, 1980: District electors approve the District of Columbia Statehood Constitutional Convention of 1979, which became D.C. Law 3-171 and which called for convening a state constitutional convention.

November 2, 1982: After the constitutional convention, a Constitution for the State of New Columbia is ratified by District voters.
This is a record of the effort to make DC a state...

I wonder whether we can find the text of the "District of Columbia Act of 1871"...
Seashore is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:05 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Project Avalon