|
|
![]() |
#1 |
Avalon Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Lunar Base II
Posts: 3,093
|
![]()
In the video documentary 'Ring of Power' http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yj0cu...eature=related the following assertion is made: 'The flag of the Washington District of Columbia has three red stars. One for each city state in the empire. This empire rules the world economically through London's "City", militarily by the District of Columbia, and spiritually by the Vatican. The Constitution for the District of Columbia operates under a tyrannical Roman law known as the lex fori and has no similarities to the U.S. Constitution'. http://www.newciv.org/nl/newslog.php...308-000266.htm Another 'Ring of Power' assertion is that 'When Congress passed the Act of 1871 it created a separate corporate government for the District of Columbia. This treasonous act allowed the District of Columbia to operate as a corporation outside the original constitution of the United States and outside of the best interest of American citizens.' The following are links which touch on the subject of this thread.
I am neither confirming or denying the validity or accuracy of the links. http://greyfalcon.us/The%20Empire%20Never%20Ended.htm http://www.luisprada.com/Protected/s...heir_power.htm http://home.earthlink.net/~walterk1/...S/USPagan.html http://www.theconspiracyexplained.com/USA.html http://www.rense.com/general74/vattt.htm http://www.newciv.org/nl/newslog.php...308-000266.htm http://www.nps.gov/nr/travel/wash/dc76.htm http://www.aoc.gov http://www.senate.gov http://www.flickr.com/search/?q=Capi...ss&w=all&s=int http://dc.about.com/cs/walkingtours/a/Capitol.htm http://www.flickr.com/search/?s=int&...+inside&m=text Last edited by orthodoxymoron; 05-06-2009 at 12:48 AM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | ||
Avalon Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 3,564
|
![]() Quote:
Is the above quote your own assertions or are you quoting the video here? Quote:
|
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
Avalon Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Lunar Base II
Posts: 3,093
|
![]() Quote:
Just quoting the 'Ring of Power' video which we were discussing. No...I simply copied and pasted the links. Here is one more, which may or may not, have a bearing on sovereignty and the Constitution: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cCMNu1ToWPA. Last edited by orthodoxymoron; 05-06-2009 at 01:09 AM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Avalon Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Lunar Base II
Posts: 3,093
|
![]()
Here is yet another link: http://www.byronwine.com/files/1871.pdf. It is a discussion of the 1871 issue...which I don't necessarily endorse. I'm just passing it on. This isn't my issue. Actually...I'm much more interested in Constructive Competition, Positive Response Ability, and Constitutional Responsible Freedom...as it relates to the U.S. Constitution. I'm more interested in reading the Federalist Papers and Anti-Federalist Papers...and learning more about the founding of the United States and the formulation of the Constitution. I'm more interested in constitutional law and in how the Constitution is applied each and every day. I don't know a lot about all of the above...but I am making progress. Here is a positive approach to the Constitution: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mY5vO...eature=related.
Last edited by orthodoxymoron; 05-06-2009 at 04:12 AM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
Avalon Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 3,564
|
![]() Quote:
The United States Isn't a Country — It's a Corporation! by Lisa Guliani Lisa states: "...The date is February 21, 1871 and the Forty-First Congress is in session. I refer you to the "Acts of the Forty-First Congress," Section 34, Session III, chapters 61 and 62. On this date in the history of our nation, Congress passed an Act titled: "An Act To Provide A Government for the District of Columbia." This is also known as the "Act of 1871." What does this mean? Well, it means that Congress, under no constitutional authority to do so, created a separate form of government for the District of Columbia, which is a ten mile square parcel of land.... In essence, this Act formed the corporation known as THE UNITED STATES. Note the capitalization, because it is important. This corporation, owned by foreign interests, moved right in and shoved the original "organic" version of the Constitution into a dusty corner. With the "Act of 1871," our Constitution was defaced in the sense that the title was block-capitalized and the word "for" was changed to the word "of" in the title. The original Constitution drafted by the Founding Fathers, was written in this manner: 'The Constitution for the united states of America'. The altered version reads: "THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA". It is the corporate constitution. It is NOT the same document you might think it is. The corporate constitution operates in an economic capacity and has been used to fool the People into thinking it is the same parchment that governs the Republic. It absolutely is not." _______________________________________________ I found a link to the actual legislation: American Memory The author Lisa must be mistaken when she says "Acts of the Forty-First Congress," Section 34... because I see that "Sections" are subtitles of a "Chapter," not a "Congress." (There is a Section 34 of chapter 62, however.) Also, chapter 61 (pages 417 - 419) is entitled "Consular and Diplomatic Expenses Appropriation," so I don't know why she includes it. Additionally, I see from the index that chapter 60 is missing. Here is a copy of that index page: ![]() Here is a copy of the first page of the legislation, which is too long to post (pages 419 - 429). It begins half way down the page: ![]() Here is a copy of the Section 34 of chapter 62. It appears to be unrelated to the issue: ![]() I'm thinking that what this author Lisa Guliani must be saying is that subsequent to this legislation, our Constitution title changed to all capital letters, indicating corporate status. She says the Constitution originally read "The Constitution for the united states of America" and now it reads "THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA." I wonder whether we can verify this... David Icke writes about the significance of names written in all caps... Hmmm... _______________________________________________ Additional research: A direct response to Lisa's assertions, by G. Edward Griffin Last edited by Seashore; 05-06-2009 at 05:20 PM. Reason: Add information |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
Avalon Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 250
|
![]() Quote:
Now that was a trippy video. Sure looks like a grey but who knows with all the tricks you can do. Does make me go "hmmm" though. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Avalon Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Lunar Base II
Posts: 3,093
|
![]()
I'm just trying to sample a lot of different things and points of view...but not get bogged down on any one thing...or take anything too seriously. Here is yet another viewpoint on Washington D.C. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eynHq...eature=related.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | |
Avalon Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 250
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Avalon Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Lunar Base II
Posts: 3,093
|
![]()
seashore: Nice job researching. I would need to hear constitutional lawyers or university professors or seasoned researchers debate the issue of constitutional corruption. Everything needs to be reexamined in a rational manner. We have taken a lot of things for granted...and trusted a lot of people and institutions in an unquestioning way. This is obviously changing. I just hope and pray that when we throw out the bathwater...we don't throw out the baby as well. Forums such as Avalon may help us to arrive at correct conclusions...and achieve appropriate responses.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Avalon Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Lunar Base II
Posts: 3,093
|
![]()
Just Following Orders vs Responding Responsibly
Last edited by orthodoxymoron; 05-08-2009 at 04:30 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
Avalon Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 3,564
|
![]()
"Even more shocking to many Americans is the notion that the Bill of Rights is intended to protect our rights from officials and personnel of the federal government...
Our American ancestors were easily able to avoid conflating the federal government and the private sector. They had learned an important lesson from history and from personal experience, a lesson that unfortunately has been lost on many modern-day Americans: the greatest threat to the freedom and well-being of a citizenry lies not with foreigners but rather with their own government, especially a government with a large standing military force... " These quotes are taken from an essay entitled "Do We Still Need the Bill of Rights? by Jacob G. Hornberger, Posted December 10, 2008. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
Avalon Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 3,564
|
![]()
Here is a website that I discovered today: Freedom.org (now Freedom21.org).
![]() They are announcing a conference to be held in Oklahoma August 13 - 15, 2009 entitled "The Growing American Tyranny and How to Stop It"... ![]() Last edited by Seashore; 05-14-2009 at 01:51 AM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
Avalon Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Turtle Island
Posts: 2,776
|
![]()
Seattle Regional Conference Fliers
Campaign for Liberty Conference Memorial Weekend Posted by Matt Hawes on 05/15/09 4:52 PM It's hard to believe that May is halfway over and next weekend is Memorial Day Weekend! We're excited about our upcoming Regional Conference in Seattle and are looking forward to a great time of inspiration, training, and networking. We've added a couple of fliers about the event to our "Handouts" section to help those of you in the Northwest area spread the word about the Conference. This flier emphasizes our free and open to the public Freedom Celebration with Dr. Paul and Tom Woods (taking place on Friday, May 22): ![]() And thanks to Michael Nystrom over at the Daily Paul for allowing us to add his great fliers. ![]() Get the full-size version here, and click here for a smaller, four-to-a-page PDF. Check out our Seattle Regional Conference event page for full agenda, registration, sponsorship, hotel, and travel details. If you are unable to make it out, consider sponsoring a student to attend. EVENT INFORMATION PAGE: http://www.campaignforliberty.com/event/2009seattle.php Source for article and links within article: http://www.campaignforliberty.com/bl...cpg=1#comments |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
Avalon Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 103
|
![]()
I bet very, few if any, of you actually know that the the Constitution is not a legally binding contract and has, when brought up in a court of law, been thrown out because it is not legally binding. It only ever applied to those people who were alive at the time of its writing and were asked if they chose to live by it. Do you know why government exists? What is its purpose?
Even the foundation upon which the United States is based is a farce, but people still believe they have standing based on it. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 | |
Avalon Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 3,564
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#16 |
Avalon Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 3,564
|
![]()
On another thread I read the phrase the "masonic constitution," and because I've seen discussions about the founding fathers being mostly masons, I googled this to see what I could find.
I found a website that lists the signers of the Constitution and whether or not they were Freemasons. I see that James Madison, considered the father of the Constitution, is listed as "no evidence of Masonic membership." Also of interest is that the site says only 33% of the signers were masons--not the majority as is often alleged. Here's what the page on the website states: "Freemasons & the U.S. Constitution The purpose of this webpage is to present information about Freemasons and the U.S. Constitution. Most of the information comes from a booklet, Masonic Membership of the Signers of the Constitution of the United States, published by the Masonic Service Association, and written by Bro. Ronald E. Heaton. It was originally published in 1962, reprinted in 1986. Please feel free to contact me with information, suggestions, or corrections about the information on this site. You can contact me by clicking on my name: Paul M. Bessel." He states in his biography on the site that he is a Freemason and lists his Freemason history. Here's the link: http://bessel.org/constmas.htm Last edited by Seashore; 05-25-2009 at 02:39 AM. Reason: Add link to the other thread |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#17 | |
Avalon Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 3,564
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#18 | |
Avalon Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Lunar Base II
Posts: 3,093
|
![]() Quote:
November 4, 1980: District electors approve the District of Columbia Statehood Constitutional Convention of 1979, which became D.C. Law 3-171 and which called for convening a state constitutional convention. November 2, 1982: After the constitutional convention, a Constitution for the State of New Columbia is ratified by District voters. Last edited by orthodoxymoron; 05-06-2009 at 02:11 AM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#19 | |
Avalon Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 3,564
|
![]() Quote:
I wonder whether we can find the text of the "District of Columbia Act of 1871"... |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|