|
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
It is a mistaken correlation to attribute a universal frequency to that of the name and IDEA of the Jesus personnae. Universal is inclusive...
what I"m suggesting is that the Frequency held by whomever in whatever circumstance attributed to Jesus, is, in fact, a universal phenoman, no matter what name you attach. The frequency experienced & emminated, that of what someone may think they know of Jesus, is the point to consider. Look into any dictionary, pick a really big one.. you will see that in the J section, there are VERY few pages. Why? Because the J sound came from the I which came from the Y. There was never that saviour purported w/the name of Jesus. So get over it!!! It cannot be argued. How would you like to go down in history and have your name wrongly published??? That's assuming we're talking about a person and not allegory/analogy/myth (back when the word myth was highly regarded ...a tool to teach spiritual concepts) The ineffable 'name'.... the inhale/exhale of existence... the inspire/expire... Hebrew being an idiomatic language (that which cannot be transliterated). The name JESUS is a LIE... intentional disinfo = lie it's conscious. Excuse me please, this is a subject that is understood to be extremely touchy... I regret that I am so compelled... am sick n tired of ignorance (which, if you are biblical, is the TRUE sin) What I am suggesting is that it is the Frequency engaged by the person toward/ with contact of a higher/benevolent power that is the point of the matter, not the name. respectively submitted |
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Avalon Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: At the doors of perception
Posts: 2,135
|
Quote:
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() G ZEUS
Last edited by 777 The Great Work; 03-14-2009 at 08:16 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Avalon Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Auroville, India
Posts: 268
|
Because of this thread I have done a bit of experimenting with the word Jesus.
I was amazed how well it worked, even if used in a more mechanical way. |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|