My first post for positive energy!

[PartOfOne]

Originally Posted by stiros

Hi Manie,
Thank you for your interesting thread,
You are totally right, that we should experience or re-invent things in our world, just to see if it is 100% truth.
Viktor Schauberger is also a favourite of mine.
Viktor Schauberger was not interested in an ordinary education, because it “spoiled his creativity”, if I remember it correctly.
And anyhow, living in this world, ruled by the power elite, we can't trust what we learn, and in a way we have to recheck all our human (serf) knowledge. (serf (and goy) is a power elite word for us ordinary people).
As I understand it, It is not a magnetic field you want to create, with the way the coil is wound.

If I remember correctly, I don't have the books any more, Otis T. Carr wrote something about a U-field and also described how to create it.
Maybe this U-field is the same as your scalar field.
According to me there are many different inventors who has invented divine machines.
But the biggest problem is that all these inventors has kept it to themselves.
OK, I understand, negative criticism and maybe a thought of a fair payment in the future.
It seems to me, if you read about these inventors and the different Patent Offices worldwide.
My conclusion, never trust a patent office, they seems to be a power elite tool.
And I don't like deliberate deceptions, but it is not the same as if somebody has done something wrong.
All these collected pieces of information helps as to understand more and more.
Here is maybe something you will find interesting, and it is maybe the common mechanism to all these different inventions.
This the same video as in the thread “Static Field – Video” by Magii
YouTube link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6G-MvvR28iQ
In this forum here is a lot of people interested in this subject, we have only to wake them up.
Comments very appreciated

I believe what your referring to is Mr. Carr's Utron field lines which were field lines from a C-shaped coil onto two triangle shaped magnets. Mr. Carr didn't trust the Patent Office either. With the trouble Mr. Carr was given he filed a patent (2912244) with the patent office of his device and listed allot of his secrets as an amusement device. He understood the games that were being played by the authorities that wanted to suppress his work and still wanted the information released. In his unpublished book and notes he has given allot of clues for many to follow. Myself I've been looking at this documentation as having allot of truth in it and been experimenting slowly to prove it step by step as everyone needs to do. With today’s discoveries of a ferrofluid hele shaw cell lens, it is made easy to see the magnetic patens of these fields as their being formed so you can work with them. Prove your work and be satisfied with your findings as a true inventor would do.

[stiros]

Originally Posted by PartOfOne

I believe what your referring to is Mr. Carr's Utron field lines which were field lines from a C-shaped coil onto two triangle shaped magnets. Mr. Carr didn't trust the Patent Office either. With the trouble Mr. Carr was given he filed a patent (2912244) with the patent office of his device and listed allot of his secrets as an amusement device. He understood the games that were being played by the authorities that wanted to suppress his work and still wanted the information released. In his unpublished book and notes he has given allot of clues for many to follow. Myself I've been looking at this documentation as having allot of truth in it and been experimenting slowly to prove it step by step as everyone needs to do. With today’s discoveries of a ferrofluid hele shaw cell lens, it is made easy to see the magnetic patens of these fields as their being formed so you can work with them. Prove your work and be satisfied with your findings as a true inventor would do.

Thank you very much PartOfOne
You are right.
If you have a dynamical field, you could use small Hall effect sensors on small sticks, “3D fixable”, but then you have to computerise these analogue signals to get a 3D-picture of it.
Everything is possible, there are probably open source programs doing this already, just to adapt.
The math-program SciLab had some interface modules before, I don't remember exactly what, because I didn't used it then.
Or if you want to measure analogue signals, you need a special “measuring unit”, and maybe they have already this 3D-capabilities, just speculations.
We should start a group about practical applications of “free energy”, right now.
What do you think?
Comments very appreciated

[PartOfOne]

Originally Posted by stiros

Thank you very much PartOfOne
You are right.
If you have a dynamical field, you could use small Hall effect sensors on small sticks, “3D fixable”, but then you have to computerise these analogue signals to get a 3D-picture of it.
Everything is possible, there are probably open source programs doing this already, just to adapt.
The math-program SciLab had some interface modules before, I don't remember exactly what, because I didn't used it then.
Or if you want to measure analogue signals, you need a special “measuring unit”, and maybe they have already this 3D-capabilities, just speculations.
We should start a group about practical applications of “free energy”, right now.
What do you think?
Comments very appreciated

It is a little easier then that. Take a look at this pdf file at this link http://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/0805/0805.4364.pdf or watch this basic video http://www.scivee.tv/node/5975 A whole new world is open to be exploring here.

[Mercuriel]

I think If We are to explore Scalar Energy - We should start on the theory behind it....

http://www.cheniere.org/toc.html

This is a good primer by a person They hope We all don't read if you get My drift.

[stiros]

Originally Posted by PartOfOne

It is a little easier then that. Take a look at this pdf file at this link http://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/0805/0805.4364.pdf or watch this basic video http://www.scivee.tv/node/5975 A whole new world is open to be exploring here.

Thank you PartOfOne,
Very interesting technique with this ferrofluid Hele-Shaw cells.
Then you add some digital filtering techniques.
And it should be possible to use SciLab as well.
I think it is very important to see what is going on, if you want to make progress in your experiment.
We use to say here in Sweden, at least some parts of it, that: “To measure is to know”.
Just a wild speculation, not joking (anyhow it is not my intention).
Could it be possible to measure for example “life force flow” or “love flow”, too.
If you have a proper “sensitive fluid” inside the Hele-Shaw cell?
What about water, water seems to be “emotionally sensitive”.
Just wild guesses.
Comments appreciated

[PartOfOne]

Originally Posted by stiros

Thank you PartOfOne,
Very interesting technique with this ferrofluid Hele-Shaw cells.
Then you add some digital filtering techniques.
And it should be possible to use SciLab as well.
I think it is very important to see what is going on, if you want to make progress in your experiment.
We use to say here in Sweden, at least some parts of it, that: “To measure is to know”.
Just a wild speculation, not joking (anyhow it is not my intention).
Could it be possible to measure for example “life force flow” or “love flow”, too.
If you have a proper “sensitive fluid” inside the Hele-Shaw cell?
What about water, water seems to be “emotionally sensitive”.
Just wild guesses.
Comments appreciated

I'm not into the emotional sensitive feedbacks at this time. Step one for me is to map the magnetic fields on electromagnetic's. Step Two is probing the levels of the fields generated; this is where my 25+ years of IT come into qualifying the need and use of the fields. So if fields are emotionally sensitive, I’m sure it will show up, I'm sure. But presently I'm still on step one.