Why hasn't Zecharia Sitchin been interviewed yet?

[manticore]

Originally Posted by mntruthseeker

yeah it always pays to check them out

I got so many mixed views on this man. Brilliant he is but honest is another thing.

I feel he misleads and holds back alot

Yes I heard him on C2C also...............New York Times also wrote an article on him. So why all of a sudden all this publicity ?

I have one theory about the sudden publicity. It is not a secret that TPTB want us to remain angry and in fear. The coming of Nibiru, if Sitchin is right, is not going to be a walk in the park. If people internalize this (two years in advance), there you have it. More fear and anxiety.

Mel

[Agape]

Originally Posted by manticore

I have one theory about the sudden publicity. It is not a secret that TPTB wants us to remain angry and in fear. The coming of Nibiru, if Sitchin is right, is not going to be a walk in the park. If people internalize this (two years in advance), there you have it. More fear and anxiety.

Mel

It's just another story to pass from generation to generation. As it's been said, the time no one knows, not even the Archangels in heavens ..
The day will come is an awareness, awareness of time , of our weakness against nature .
Till then, there's a lots of time to pass by and it's us only who will be deciding of our future and the next generations will follow .

That too is a prejudice, can be .

We have to decide sooner the better about fate of this civilisation and i am still hopeful that its fate is in good hands..


Regards

A

[omshanti]

possibly why sitchin was "pleased" with the veritas interview was because it was superficial and he was not challenged in any way by deep questioning. because sitchin is hard to get, interviewers seem to want to get on his "good" side. this equals a ho hum interview as far as i'm concerned.

there are many scholars who question the veracity of sitchin's findings. i am interested in his jewish links and possible links to secret sects. yes, i also recall the david icke interview whereby sitchin was seen to shape shift. he was not a high ranking member of the group as i recall.

there is also suggestion that his prolific writings are aided by channelled info.
he uses the pronoun "we" instead of "i" when explaining his theories...
we think/we suggest/

anton parks (french) has more breadth and insight in relation to sumerian clay tablet findings as well a more detailed account of et races.
sitchin has certainly opened up portals for deep discussion, but i do feel he is pulling many veils and is not an independent agent.
any researcher needs to be flexible, wiling to allow new ideas to emerge. sitchin's ego is fixed. he seems to view others as less. he takes a very patriarchal stand which is why, perhaps, the sumerian wars and tales of king and conquering appeal...the "cute" old man does not work for me.

[Agape]

Don't forget he is an old type of scholar . Even as a scholar you can reach the heights of Spirit and he has gone far that way I'm sure,
he is gaining wisdom without pain now..

There 's not many people who will go in their path but some will always do.

Is his work channeled ? I'd say def not but it's highly inspired . He knows 'they are there' or rather that 'they are here'.
'They' may be invisible to us as we may be to them.
They can speak to us if they want. Not all are gifted enough to understand much so all kind of 'blah..' is coming out and circling around too.

Few people make it to a system , they are living predecessors of current computer generation

Systems are good to absorb because they enlarge your vision and fix your mind in the bigger picture structures .

But the new generation of kids now is able to absorb this very easily , without your ever noticing it
and you don't know yet how complex the future may become..




A

[manticore]

Originally Posted by omshanti

possibly why sitchin was "pleased" with the veritas interview was because it was superficial and he was not challenged in any way by deep questioning. because sitchin is hard to get, interviewers seem to want to get on his "good" side. this equals a ho hum interview as far as i'm concerned.

Hello omshanti,

You may be partially right on this. But let's not generalize Veritas, as every time I've heard him on Coast to Coast AM, the same applies. He only gives a 30-minute interview and even does a pre-interview with you to see if you are qualified enough. Besides, it is pretty tough to challenge someone in 30 minutes without building some type of rapport.

Cheers,

Mel