Questions for THEWATCHER

[Steve_A]

Hi Karen,

I think you spelt my name wrong.

It's not written XXXX, it's written steve_a.

I was probably the first to doubt the veracity of Mr. Kings' claims, but was asked to lay off, which of course I did.

I may not be able to write about what I think about Mr. King and his claims, however I can still think about them.

Which brings me to this post. It's better to not argue the toss with someone in the forums when they make incredible claims. Just decide if you think what is being presented is the truth.

If you have a doubt, ask searching questions. Analyse the answers.

Truth is unique, sole, mighty, as there is only one.

Slavver ( http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=slavver ) comes in many shapes and sizes.

Best regards,

Steve

Originally Posted by Karen

I haven't been following this thread, but the current situation is now being discussed by the moderators ...
I'm having a deja vu attack ...

This was from Kerry to the moderators on Dec 23, 2008
Hi All: I have been notified that XXXX is badgering The Watcher... Regardless of the underlying reason for that it must stop! The Watcher is our guest. He is a whistleblower and regardless of your personal opinion of him I request that you do not interfere with his posts... or argue with him. If you want to communicate your pov to me you are welcome to do so. Thank you. Kerry

[Helvetic]

You did it again Steve_A! Whats wrong with you?
Nobody needs your arrogant, stupid comments and links about "Slavver" here!!

[Steve_A]

Hi Helvetic,

I didn't think I was being arrogant to post a point of view.

If that comes across as arrogant to you, I can accept it, due to our difference in culture, but on the contrary of being arrogant I also stated that we shouldn't bicker in the forum, that we should just accept or not what is being posted.

To my suprise the very first post came from somebody who wanted to bicker. Go figure.

I put a link to "slavver" as an afterthought to try and explain what the word meant in the context that I used it. Not everybody is from the UK in this forum. You will notice that the link points to an 'urbain' dictionary, which explains slang words. Slavver in its' true sense wouldn't have made sense in the sentance.

Best regards,

Steve

Originally Posted by Helvetic

You did it again Steve_A! Whats wrong with you?
Nobody needs your arrogant, stupid comments and links about "Slavver" here!!

[Helvetic]

I dont care if your "Slavver" points to an urbain dictionary or not.
We all know your point of view in this subject from your previous posts...

This was from Kerry to the moderators on Dec 23, 2008
Hi All: I have been notified that Steve_A is badgering The Watcher... Regardless of the underlying reason for that it must stop! The Watcher is our guest. He is a whistleblower and regardless of your personal opinion of him I request that you do not interfere with his posts... or argue with him. If you want to communicate your pov to me you are welcome to do so. Thank you. Kerry

And I dont think the "difference in culture" gives you the right to treaten a
person this way, its poor and respectless. This is my point of view!

[Steve_A]

Hi Helvetic,

I have never threatened anybody on this forum.

I would like to know where you got this sort of information from as this is a very serious accusation.

I know that everybody knows my position from previous posts. That's why I posted them, to let people know.

You see I hide nothing. It's better that way.

Best regards,

Steve

Originally Posted by Helvetic

I dont care if your "Slavver" points to an urbain dictionary or not.
We all know your point of view in this subject from your previous posts...



And I dont think the "difference in culture" gives you the right to treaten a
person this way, its poor and respectless. This is my point of view!

[Helvetic]

Maybe its the "difference in culture" that I dont wanna repeat and quote everything twice here.
Use your mouse to scroll back.
And now lets go back to business.

Regards,
Helvetic

[Steve_A]

Hi Helvetic,

Now you can understand what I was trying to say.

You could have meant to say 'treat' (which is what I really thought) a person this way instead of threaten (which is what I used just to put a cat amongst the pidgeons).

Just by that one word I reckon you're from Der Schweiz and not from Svizzera nor Suisse. I would break out in Romanche but I wouldn't want to appear arrogant.

I lived in Geneva for almost a year and also another in Basel so thankfully I know more or less how the Swiss are.

Best regards,

Steve

Originally Posted by Helvetic

Maybe its the "difference in culture" that I dont wanna repeat and quote everything twice here.
Use your mouse to scroll back.
And now lets go back to business.

Regards,
Helvetic

[THEWATCHER]

Originally Posted by Steve_A

Hi Karen,

I think you spelt my name wrong.

It's not written XXXX, it's written steve_a.

I was probably the first to doubt the veracity of Mr. Kings' claims, but was asked to lay off, which of course I did.

I may not be able to write about what I think about Mr. King and his claims, however I can still think about them.

Which brings me to this post. It's better to not argue the toss with someone in the forums when they make incredible claims. Just decide if you think what is being presented is the truth.

If you have a doubt, ask searching questions. Analyse the answers.

Truth is unique, sole, mighty, as there is only one.

Slavver ( http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=slavver ) comes in many shapes and sizes.

Best regards,

Steve

A number have made incredible claims here, among the insiders and whistleblowers, not many can verify what they actually claim. CHECK IT! You want names? And I can see a few such slavvers here in this thread, pointing no fingers of course LOL

THE WATCHER

[Steve_A]

Hi THEWATCHER,

Yes, you're right.

There are some that have made incredible claims in the forums. I also reserve the right to think about those as I wish also, and I do.

But the point of my post was to try to avoid tittle tattle and to just try and get to the meat.

If we choose not to beleive, are we wrong? If on the other hand we choose to beleive, are we right?

It's that decision we arrive at that should be made in our own minds.

Best regards,

Steve

Originally Posted by THEWATCHER

A number have made incredible claims here, among the insiders and whistleblowers, not many can verify what they actually claim. CHECK IT! You want names? And I can see a few such slavvers here in this thread, pointing no fingers of course LOL

THE WATCHER

[Kari Lynn]

*

[THEWATCHER]

Originally Posted by Steve_A

Hi THEWATCHER,

Yes, you're right.

There are some that have made incredible claims in the forums. I also reserve the right to think about those as I wish also, and I do.

But the point of my post was to try to avoid tittle tattle and to just try and get to the meat.

If we choose not to beleive, are we wrong? If on the other hand we choose to beleive, are we right?

It's that decision we arrive at that should be made in our own minds.

Best regards,

Steve

Correct Steve, to blindly accept and believe is wrong, just as it is to blindly disbelieve without at least giving a fair hearing. The middleground is all I seek here. To present my data and let you all decide if it is truthful to you. Why would anyone continue for 15 years disclosing the data if there was little hope of others coming forward at some stage to validate and verify that data. Regards, Barry

THE WATCHER

[Egg]

Originally Posted by Kathleen

To those members who are annoyed by the questions being asked Mr King there is an ignore option.

That made me chuckle. A moderator on a forum for open minded people showing how to ignore a questioning mind on the forum.

If the question bothers you then maybe your not so worried about the questions answer?

No disrespect meant, I just find irony in it is all.