Questions for THEWATCHER

[THEWATCHER]

Originally Posted by Steve_A

Hi Karen,

I think you spelt my name wrong.

It's not written XXXX, it's written steve_a.

I was probably the first to doubt the veracity of Mr. Kings' claims, but was asked to lay off, which of course I did.

I may not be able to write about what I think about Mr. King and his claims, however I can still think about them.

Which brings me to this post. It's better to not argue the toss with someone in the forums when they make incredible claims. Just decide if you think what is being presented is the truth.

If you have a doubt, ask searching questions. Analyse the answers.

Truth is unique, sole, mighty, as there is only one.

Slavver ( http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=slavver ) comes in many shapes and sizes.

Best regards,

Steve

A number have made incredible claims here, among the insiders and whistleblowers, not many can verify what they actually claim. CHECK IT! You want names? And I can see a few such slavvers here in this thread, pointing no fingers of course LOL

THE WATCHER

[Steve_A]

Hi THEWATCHER,

Yes, you're right.

There are some that have made incredible claims in the forums. I also reserve the right to think about those as I wish also, and I do.

But the point of my post was to try to avoid tittle tattle and to just try and get to the meat.

If we choose not to beleive, are we wrong? If on the other hand we choose to beleive, are we right?

It's that decision we arrive at that should be made in our own minds.

Best regards,

Steve

Originally Posted by THEWATCHER

A number have made incredible claims here, among the insiders and whistleblowers, not many can verify what they actually claim. CHECK IT! You want names? And I can see a few such slavvers here in this thread, pointing no fingers of course LOL

THE WATCHER

[Kari Lynn]

*

[THEWATCHER]

Originally Posted by Steve_A

Hi THEWATCHER,

Yes, you're right.

There are some that have made incredible claims in the forums. I also reserve the right to think about those as I wish also, and I do.

But the point of my post was to try to avoid tittle tattle and to just try and get to the meat.

If we choose not to beleive, are we wrong? If on the other hand we choose to beleive, are we right?

It's that decision we arrive at that should be made in our own minds.

Best regards,

Steve

Correct Steve, to blindly accept and believe is wrong, just as it is to blindly disbelieve without at least giving a fair hearing. The middleground is all I seek here. To present my data and let you all decide if it is truthful to you. Why would anyone continue for 15 years disclosing the data if there was little hope of others coming forward at some stage to validate and verify that data. Regards, Barry

THE WATCHER

[Egg]

Originally Posted by Kathleen

To those members who are annoyed by the questions being asked Mr King there is an ignore option.

That made me chuckle. A moderator on a forum for open minded people showing how to ignore a questioning mind on the forum.

If the question bothers you then maybe your not so worried about the questions answer?

No disrespect meant, I just find irony in it is all.