|
|
![]() |
#1 |
Avalon Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 3,117
|
![]()
I agree with you Brinty...
But if it's no fake story, then that would be clear and stunning evidance of time travel ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
Avalon Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Blackbutt, Queensland, Australia
Posts: 1,004
|
![]() Quote:
![]() "Here is the latest news: Archaelogists have discovered evidence of time travel. Sadly, all that travelled was time - not the owner." ![]() Or maybe, a few years ago, one of a gang of tomb robbers was wearing it and they were all caught in a sudden deluge and were washed away ![]() Another suspicious point is that there is a convention in the "photography-for-advertisement" field, where watches and clocks are photographed with the hands set at roughly 10 to 2, or 10 past 10 to give the photo a balanced look. ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Avalon Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: U.K.
Posts: 3,380
|
![]()
Yeah it does appear somewhat fishy to say the least but-yer never know-human- type footprints in devonian sandstone etc.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Avalon Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 203
|
![]()
A Swiss reporter asked Marie Roche from the Clock Museum in La Chaux-de-Fonds, Switzerland. She said that such Clockrings are typical for the years 1950-1960. But this one is never ever 400 years old.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
![]()
takes a licking and keeps on ticking
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|