Israel 'prepared to attack' Iran nuclear plants

Celtic_Man · 12-04-2008, 07:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by feeler

Nothing new at all...

Speaking of nothing new, the last thing I expect is to see no backing from the U.S.

Who are they fooling?

-feeler

Notice no one did a damn thing when Kim in North Korea was flinging nukes and missiles around during his tests. Or allowing Pakistan, a muslim nation which could go fundamentalist at any time to retain a substantial nuclear arsenal.

Operator · 12-04-2008, 08:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Celtic_Man

Notice no did a damn thing when Kim in North Korea was flinging nukes and missiles around during his tests. Or allowing Pakistan, a muslim nation which could go fundamentalist at any time to retain a substantial nuclear arsenal.

Hi,

US military is in Iraq not for oil alone ... I was told.
On an old part of the homepage of Project Camelot (now moved to archive) Dan Burisch mentioned this:

Genesis 3:24 (V) "eiecitque Adam et conlocavit ante paradisum voluptatis cherubin et flammeum gladium atque versatilem ad custodiendam viam ligni vitae"

Translated in English (http://www.biblegateway.com) it says:

Genesis 3:24 (New Living Translation)

24 After sending them out, the Lord God stationed mighty cherubim to the east of the Garden of Eden. And he placed a flaming sword that flashed back and forth to guard the way to the tree of life.

Now if Iraq is considered to be the ancient area of the garden of Eden and Iran is east to it ....

What special reason could they have to engage in Iran in the coming years ?

Cheers

burgundia · 12-04-2008, 08:13 PM

I just hope that Krzysztof Jackowski's recent words will not come true. He has said that the war is a matter of months and that everything is already in motion. However..remember about our collective consciousness and do not give up hope for a better future.

Helvetic · 12-04-2008, 09:22 PM

Its realy on the edge right now. I hope this is going good for us all.

Jack · 12-04-2008, 09:51 PM

An interesting notion when you take into consideration that Russia has already vowed to back Iran if such an attack were to be carried out.

I'll be keeping an eye on this one.

dagon · 12-05-2008, 02:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Operator

Hi,

US military is in Iraq not for oil alone ... I was told.
On an old part of the homepage of Project Camelot (now moved to archive) Dan Burisch mentioned this:

Genesis 3:24 (V) "eiecitque Adam et conlocavit ante paradisum voluptatis cherubin et flammeum gladium atque versatilem ad custodiendam viam ligni vitae"

Translated in English (http://www.biblegateway.com) it says:

Genesis 3:24 (New Living Translation)

24 After sending them out, the Lord God stationed mighty cherubim to the east of the Garden of Eden. And he placed a flaming sword that flashed back and forth to guard the way to the tree of life.

Now if Iraq is considered to be the ancient area of the garden of Eden and Iran is east to it ....

What special reason could they have to engage in Iran in the coming years ?

Cheers

two words. Zecharia Sitchin.
these have been my thoughts the whole time.
as well as why we wiped out the native american culture here in america. control of the ancient spiritual teachings. the native americans of the time were willing to share there land. even helped us. I always thought thanksgiving was a warped holiday. but after all we did win the war. this one is no different.

Northern Boy · 12-05-2008, 11:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dagon

two words. Zecharia Sitchin.
these have been my thoughts the whole time.
as well as why we wiped out the native american culture here in america. control of the ancient spiritual teachings. the native americans of the time were willing to share there land. even helped us. I always thought thanksgiving was a warped holiday. but after all we did win the war. this one is no different.

I feel the same way u do these people`s have been wronged in a big way we should have adopted there way of life instaed

Antaletriangle · 12-06-2008, 12:44 AM

I can't believe the gall of Bush=i'm sure most people are now aware that 9/11 was an inside job and he says this:
http://uk.reuters.com/article/worldN...4B44S120081205
Fri Dec 5, 2008 5:18pm GMT

Tabassum Zakaria

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - U.S. President George W. Bush said on Friday that Iran's nuclear program remained a threat to peace and the United States would not allow Tehran to develop an atomic weapon.

The West has offered Iran diplomatic and economic incentives to suspend uranium enrichment and to support a civilian nuclear power program, Bush said in a speech he planned to give to the Saban Forum later in the day.

"While Iran has not accepted these offers, we have made our bottom line clear: For the safety of our people and the peace of the world, America will not allow Iran to develop a nuclear weapon," Bush said in the speech released by the White House.

Amid hopeful signs of political, economic and social reforms advancing in the Middle East, serious challenges remain, Bush said.

"Iran and Syria continue to sponsor terror, Iran's uranium enrichment remains a major threat to peace, and many in the region still live under oppression," he said.

Bush defended his decision to go to war against Iraq in March 2003 and topple Saddam Hussein, saying that after the September 11, 2001, attacks the United States could not risk the threat Baghdad posed at that time.

"It is true, as I have said many times, that Saddam Hussein was not connected to the 9/11 attacks," Bush said.

But after nearly 3,000 people died in the September 11 attacks, the United States had to decide whether it could tolerate an enemy that supported terrorism and was believed to have weapons of mass destruction, and found "this was a risk we could not afford to take."
Weapons of mass destruction were never found in Iraq after the U.S.-led invasion, and this is considered a major intelligence failure. Bush in a recent television interview said the faulty intelligence on Iraq was the biggest regret of his presidency.

"When Saddam's regime fell, we refused to take the easy option and install a friendly strongman in his place," Bush said. "Even though it required enormous sacrifice, we stood by the Iraqi people as they elected their own leaders and built a young democracy."

He acknowledged that efforts have not always gone according to plan and sometimes fell short, saying "the fight in Iraq has been longer and more costly than expected."

12-04-2008, 08:13 PM	#3
burgundia Avalon Senior Member Join Date: Oct 2008 Location: Poland Posts: 3,442	Re: Israel 'prepared to attack' Iran nuclear plants I just hope that Krzysztof Jackowski's recent words will not come true. He has said that the war is a matter of months and that everything is already in motion. However..remember about our collective consciousness and do not give up hope for a better future.

12-04-2008, 09:22 PM	#4
Helvetic Avalon Senior Member Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: Switzerland Posts: 203	Re: Israel 'prepared to attack' Iran nuclear plants Its realy on the edge right now. I hope this is going good for us all.

12-04-2008, 09:51 PM	#5
Jack Avalon Senior Member Join Date: Oct 2008 Posts: 454	Re: Israel 'prepared to attack' Iran nuclear plants An interesting notion when you take into consideration that Russia has already vowed to back Iran if such an attack were to be carried out. I'll be keeping an eye on this one.

12-06-2008, 12:44 AM	#8
Antaletriangle Avalon Senior Member Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: U.K. Posts: 3,380	Re: Israel 'prepared to attack' Iran nuclear plants I can't believe the gall of Bush=i'm sure most people are now aware that 9/11 was an inside job and he says this: http://uk.reuters.com/article/worldN...4B44S120081205 Fri Dec 5, 2008 5:18pm GMT Tabassum Zakaria WASHINGTON (Reuters) - U.S. President George W. Bush said on Friday that Iran's nuclear program remained a threat to peace and the United States would not allow Tehran to develop an atomic weapon. The West has offered Iran diplomatic and economic incentives to suspend uranium enrichment and to support a civilian nuclear power program, Bush said in a speech he planned to give to the Saban Forum later in the day. "While Iran has not accepted these offers, we have made our bottom line clear: For the safety of our people and the peace of the world, America will not allow Iran to develop a nuclear weapon," Bush said in the speech released by the White House. Amid hopeful signs of political, economic and social reforms advancing in the Middle East, serious challenges remain, Bush said. "Iran and Syria continue to sponsor terror, Iran's uranium enrichment remains a major threat to peace, and many in the region still live under oppression," he said. Bush defended his decision to go to war against Iraq in March 2003 and topple Saddam Hussein, saying that after the September 11, 2001, attacks the United States could not risk the threat Baghdad posed at that time. "It is true, as I have said many times, that Saddam Hussein was not connected to the 9/11 attacks," Bush said. But after nearly 3,000 people died in the September 11 attacks, the United States had to decide whether it could tolerate an enemy that supported terrorism and was believed to have weapons of mass destruction, and found "this was a risk we could not afford to take." Weapons of mass destruction were never found in Iraq after the U.S.-led invasion, and this is considered a major intelligence failure. Bush in a recent television interview said the faulty intelligence on Iraq was the biggest regret of his presidency. "When Saddam's regime fell, we refused to take the easy option and install a friendly strongman in his place," Bush said. "Even though it required enormous sacrifice, we stood by the Iraqi people as they elected their own leaders and built a young democracy." He acknowledged that efforts have not always gone according to plan and sometimes fell short, saying "the fight in Iraq has been longer and more costly than expected."