Reclaiming Human Sovereignty

Citizen Zeitgeist · 09-11-2008, 05:20 PM

When blessed living souls are incarnated as Human Beings on Planet Earth, they are almost always registered with the government of the country of their physical birth. Undisclosed to the parents is the knowledge that each new born is then allocated a bond number and a securities account with the IMF, valued at what they perceive to be our financial worth over the course of an average lifetime of tax-paying enslavement. This transaction is known as the Security of the Person and is bought and sold on various securities exchanges by the international banksters.

Each Human Being is worth the value of the country’s resources divided by the population at the time of their birth. This method is used by all members of the IMF to securitise interest payments, on what is commonly known as the ‘national debts'. This system has been created for the dual purposes of perpetuating the power and wealth of the international banksters, controlling governments and enslaving the rest of us with a debt that can never be repaid. Since all credit that is created out of nothing adds to the balance it is supposed to reduce, there is no possible way to eradicate the debt within the current system.

However, our registration at birth serves another purpose; it creates a corporate entity associated with our name, almost always denoted in capital letters. It also constitutes the legal consent of parents to the registration of their children as the 'chattal property' of the state’s creditors (the banksters), under the jurisdiction of Admiralty Law, also known as Commercial Law, or the law of the seas.

Withiin the boundaries this legal jurisdiction, all matters are matters of contract, and no contract is legally enforcable unless full disclosure exists between the parties at signature and provable consent has been appropriately given. Birth certificates are, in reality, the registration documents of our enslavement by proxy, since they register our names as future government employees, whom, until such time that we start paying government taxes, will be considered a ward of the state.

For the avoidance of doubt, it is my considered opinion that registering the birth of our children waives all legal rights we might think we have over the lives of our offspring, meaning that most of us are not actually the legal guardians of our own children.

Paradoxically, this little known universal deception is what invalidates the government’s contract with the corporate entity associated with our name, or the legal person. The fact that parents are never furnished with these crucial terms and conditions represents a clear case of non-disclosure. Furthermore, this renders every contract that we have ever entered into with a government agency unenforcable, but only once we revoke our consent to be governed.

To illuminate this complicated concept by way of example, when we apply to the DVLC for our driving license, we are in reality granting our consent to be governed by any punitive statutes, acts or codes they might impose upon our person’s right to free movement, when there is no law that compels us to apply for a driving license. It is at this point that we must recognise the difference between a statute and the law.

Statutes, acts, bye-laws and codes are rules drawn up by a corporation that are given the force of the law, but they only apply to its employees, partners and executives. The law, or more accurately, Common Law, or the law of the land, has been constructed to protect all Human Beings living on Planet Earth. We are all at liberty to act according to our own free will, provided we do not infringe the ability of others to do the same. In other words, as long as we don’t infringe the the rights to life, liberty and property of another Human Being, no judge has the legal authority to order us to do anything, including appear in court..

There are a myriad of ways in which we are tricked into granting our legal consent unwittingly. When we accept a traffic violation in order to avoid going to court, or to avoid being charged a heavier fine, we are confirming our consent to be governed according to the Department of Transport’s fee schedule for the public highway, upon which we already have a Common Law right to travel freely.

Similarly, when we admit a speeding offence to the clerk to the justices, we are granting our consent to be bound by the verdict of the court that hears the charges against us. Just agreeing to be ‘the defendant’, or standing in the dock, grants our consent to be judged according the ruling of a de facto commercial tribuneral, that has no lawful jurisdiction over Human Beings, only the legal persons associated with them.

To fully comprehend this maze of deception, we must also make the distinction between ‘legal’ and ‘lawful’. When something is legal it is allowed within the framework of a mutually-agreed contract, whether explicit by signature, or implied through passive consent, under the jurisdiction of Commercial Law. When something is lawful, it means that the Common Law rights of no other Human Being will be infringed by initiating the respective course of action. In other words, there is no injured party who is willing to give sworn testimony against us.

It is our failure to recognise these crucial distinctions that grants the government the legal right to hold us as collateral against the national debt, which is tantamount to giving our legal consent for our children to be perpetually enslaved by the banksters. It also represents the reason why it has been so easy for the Global Collectivists to pass so many draconian statutes in North America and the European Union; they are merely the rules that govern corporations and their employees and do not require the consent of parliament, since they are merely corporate rules that are given the force of law by mutual consent of the parties.

We should understand that it is our birthright to seek lawful remedy for all our financial problems, as the shareholders of the corporation associated with our country of birth. By establishing a Notice of Undertanding and Intent & Claim of Right, witnessed by a Notary Public and delivered to the government by recorded post, provided it is not rebutted under oath and full commercial liablity, under penalty of perjury, within the stated time constraints, lawful excuse can be established that enables us to revoke our consent to be governed by the rules of a soulless corporation.

This is the means by which we can all reclaim our individual sovereignty from those who have enslaved us for their own gain. When we achieve this in sufficient numbers, the old system will quickly crumble and we will have the infinite potential of humanity laid out before us in its glorious splendour, in a World governed by individual responsibility and mutual cooperation, rather than the fear of endless debt, starvation, disease and invisible enemies.

This essay is the considered opinion of the author and does not constitute legal advice.

Peace, love and light to all,

Citizen Zeitgeist
http://www.freetheplanet.info

Morgan · 09-11-2008, 06:37 PM

I've read about this at a lot of different web locations... But it still seems unclear to me. I get that the government/corporation could write such dodgy rules/statutes that try to wrestle all of our rights from us (or at least what we 'think' are our rights), but I'd still feel more comfortable to see the original documents where this occurs so that I feel reassured that I am taking the right steps.

Anyway, appreciate the post

Will check out the website.

Citizen Zeitgeist · 09-11-2008, 07:52 PM

The place to start researching would be http://www.thinkfree.ca, where you will find freeman resources and success stories.

If you haven't already read Mary Croft's book, HOW I CLOBBERED EVERY BUREAUCRATIC CASH CONFISCATARY AGENCY KNOWN TO MAN, you can download it below:

http://www.suijuris.net/forum/citize...roft-book.html

I hope these links will answer your questions.

09-11-2008, 05:20 PM	#1
Citizen Zeitgeist Avalon Senior Member Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: UK Posts: 27	Reclaiming Human Sovereignty When blessed living souls are incarnated as Human Beings on Planet Earth, they are almost always registered with the government of the country of their physical birth. Undisclosed to the parents is the knowledge that each new born is then allocated a bond number and a securities account with the IMF, valued at what they perceive to be our financial worth over the course of an average lifetime of tax-paying enslavement. This transaction is known as the Security of the Person and is bought and sold on various securities exchanges by the international banksters. Each Human Being is worth the value of the country’s resources divided by the population at the time of their birth. This method is used by all members of the IMF to securitise interest payments, on what is commonly known as the ‘national debts'. This system has been created for the dual purposes of perpetuating the power and wealth of the international banksters, controlling governments and enslaving the rest of us with a debt that can never be repaid. Since all credit that is created out of nothing adds to the balance it is supposed to reduce, there is no possible way to eradicate the debt within the current system. However, our registration at birth serves another purpose; it creates a corporate entity associated with our name, almost always denoted in capital letters. It also constitutes the legal consent of parents to the registration of their children as the 'chattal property' of the state’s creditors (the banksters), under the jurisdiction of Admiralty Law, also known as Commercial Law, or the law of the seas. Withiin the boundaries this legal jurisdiction, all matters are matters of contract, and no contract is legally enforcable unless full disclosure exists between the parties at signature and provable consent has been appropriately given. Birth certificates are, in reality, the registration documents of our enslavement by proxy, since they register our names as future government employees, whom, until such time that we start paying government taxes, will be considered a ward of the state. For the avoidance of doubt, it is my considered opinion that registering the birth of our children waives all legal rights we might think we have over the lives of our offspring, meaning that most of us are not actually the legal guardians of our own children. Paradoxically, this little known universal deception is what invalidates the government’s contract with the corporate entity associated with our name, or the legal person. The fact that parents are never furnished with these crucial terms and conditions represents a clear case of non-disclosure. Furthermore, this renders every contract that we have ever entered into with a government agency unenforcable, but only once we revoke our consent to be governed. To illuminate this complicated concept by way of example, when we apply to the DVLC for our driving license, we are in reality granting our consent to be governed by any punitive statutes, acts or codes they might impose upon our person’s right to free movement, when there is no law that compels us to apply for a driving license. It is at this point that we must recognise the difference between a statute and the law. Statutes, acts, bye-laws and codes are rules drawn up by a corporation that are given the force of the law, but they only apply to its employees, partners and executives. The law, or more accurately, Common Law, or the law of the land, has been constructed to protect all Human Beings living on Planet Earth. We are all at liberty to act according to our own free will, provided we do not infringe the ability of others to do the same. In other words, as long as we don’t infringe the the rights to life, liberty and property of another Human Being, no judge has the legal authority to order us to do anything, including appear in court.. There are a myriad of ways in which we are tricked into granting our legal consent unwittingly. When we accept a traffic violation in order to avoid going to court, or to avoid being charged a heavier fine, we are confirming our consent to be governed according to the Department of Transport’s fee schedule for the public highway, upon which we already have a Common Law right to travel freely. Similarly, when we admit a speeding offence to the clerk to the justices, we are granting our consent to be bound by the verdict of the court that hears the charges against us. Just agreeing to be ‘the defendant’, or standing in the dock, grants our consent to be judged according the ruling of a de facto commercial tribuneral, that has no lawful jurisdiction over Human Beings, only the legal persons associated with them. To fully comprehend this maze of deception, we must also make the distinction between ‘legal’ and ‘lawful’. When something is legal it is allowed within the framework of a mutually-agreed contract, whether explicit by signature, or implied through passive consent, under the jurisdiction of Commercial Law. When something is lawful, it means that the Common Law rights of no other Human Being will be infringed by initiating the respective course of action. In other words, there is no injured party who is willing to give sworn testimony against us. It is our failure to recognise these crucial distinctions that grants the government the legal right to hold us as collateral against the national debt, which is tantamount to giving our legal consent for our children to be perpetually enslaved by the banksters. It also represents the reason why it has been so easy for the Global Collectivists to pass so many draconian statutes in North America and the European Union; they are merely the rules that govern corporations and their employees and do not require the consent of parliament, since they are merely corporate rules that are given the force of law by mutual consent of the parties. We should understand that it is our birthright to seek lawful remedy for all our financial problems, as the shareholders of the corporation associated with our country of birth. By establishing a Notice of Undertanding and Intent & Claim of Right, witnessed by a Notary Public and delivered to the government by recorded post, provided it is not rebutted under oath and full commercial liablity, under penalty of perjury, within the stated time constraints, lawful excuse can be established that enables us to revoke our consent to be governed by the rules of a soulless corporation. This is the means by which we can all reclaim our individual sovereignty from those who have enslaved us for their own gain. When we achieve this in sufficient numbers, the old system will quickly crumble and we will have the infinite potential of humanity laid out before us in its glorious splendour, in a World governed by individual responsibility and mutual cooperation, rather than the fear of endless debt, starvation, disease and invisible enemies. This essay is the considered opinion of the author and does not constitute legal advice. Peace, love and light to all, Citizen Zeitgeist http://www.freetheplanet.info

09-11-2008, 06:37 PM	#2
Morgan Avalon Senior Member Join Date: Sep 2008 Posts: 107	Re: Reclaiming Human Sovereignty I've read about this at a lot of different web locations... But it still seems unclear to me. I get that the government/corporation could write such dodgy rules/statutes that try to wrestle all of our rights from us (or at least what we 'think' are our rights), but I'd still feel more comfortable to see the original documents where this occurs so that I feel reassured that I am taking the right steps. Anyway, appreciate the post Will check out the website.

09-11-2008, 07:52 PM	#3
Citizen Zeitgeist Avalon Senior Member Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: UK Posts: 27	Re: Reclaiming Human Sovereignty The place to start researching would be http://www.thinkfree.ca, where you will find freeman resources and success stories. If you haven't already read Mary Croft's book, HOW I CLOBBERED EVERY BUREAUCRATIC CASH CONFISCATARY AGENCY KNOWN TO MAN, you can download it below: http://www.suijuris.net/forum/citize...roft-book.html I hope these links will answer your questions.