Dr A True Ott's Perspective

[Seashore]

Dr Ott has forwarded an email of his to a blog he associates himself with (http://labvirus.wordpress.com/2010/0...-mind-control/) in order to get the word out about a video he wants us to watch and his comments about it.

Here is the link to the video:

http://cnettv.cnet.com/60-minutes-mi...-50004855.html

Here are Dr Ott's comments:

"1. The technology called FMRI (Functional Magnetic Resonance) is OLD and ARCHAIC actually. Mengele and others were 'reading' brain waves via magnetic resonance graphing in the early 70’s. Boston-Logan Airport is already using NEW light-wave beams to scan AND READ air traveler’s INTENTIONS before they board the planes.

"2. The GERMAN individual Stahl interviewed was very HESITANT TO REVEAL exactly WHO HAD THE MIND-READING TECHNOLOGY TODAY. Again, just look at the U.S. PATENTS issued in the last decade to realize the height and breadth of the mind-control explosion – and keep in mind that patents are usually applied for AFTER the technology has been proven to be commercially viable via working models. —.

"3. The FMRI 'computer' that 'reads the mind' is just one side of the coin. IT IS MUCH, MUCH EASIER TO PRODUCE EMOTIONS AND IMPULSES INTO the brain than to actually READ the brain via computer programs.

". This technology needs much more bandwidth space than is currently provided by ANALOG SIGNALS in order to be implemented. Thus the need to switch to DIGITAL SIGNALS EXCLUSIVELY.

"5. THIS TECHNOLOGY, IN THE WRONG HANDS, IS A BIGGER THREAT TO INDIVIDUAL FREEDOM THAN ANY STANDING ARMY.

"6. IS HOMELAND SECURITY THE 'WRONG HANDS'?? Why is this just now beginning to be reported by such news programs as “60 Minutes”?

"Read this patent abstract, and then read my expose on DIGITAL TV once again in the context of Stahl’s report.

"U.S. PATENT #6,488,617

"TITLE: Nervous System Manipulation by EM Fields from Monitors

"Issued to: Loos, Hendricus

"Abstract: Physiological effects have been observed in a human subject in response to stimulation of the skin with weak electromagnetic fields that are pulsed with certain frequencies near 1/2 Hz or 2.4 Hz, such as to excite a sensory resonance. Many computer monitors and HD TV screens, when displaying pulsed images, emit pulsed electromagnetic fields of sufficient amplitudes to cause such excitation. It is therefore possible to manipulate the nervous system of a subject by pulsing images displayed on a nearby computer monitor or DIGITAL TV set. For the latter, the image pulsing may be embedded in the program material, or it may be overlaid by modulating a video stream, either as an RF signal or as a video signal. The image displayed on a computer monitor may be pulsed effectively by a simple computer program. For certain monitors, pulsed electromagnetic fields capable of exciting sensory resonances in nearby subjects may be generated even as the displayed images are pulsed with subliminal intensity. USP # 6,488,617 (December 3, 2002)"

[Seashore]

Originally Posted by Seashore

http://cnettv.cnet.com/60-minutes-mi...-50004855.html

I was uncomfortable with the part of the video showing that the experiment conducted with images to see whether the computer would know what was seen was greeted with such glee and pride - "ten out of ten!!" - I thought this sent an unfortunate message.