New Message from Matthew

[Sarahmay]

Originally Posted by mntruthseeker

Viking

May I ask where this message was found ? Are you channeling this ? Is someone else chaneling it ?

I was enjoying it until I read a mention of david Wilcocks name..............then it came off as total BS

I am not putting you down but inquiring only.

Why would David's name appear as if ?????? Why not Jesus's name. Isnt this exactly what He tried to get out to the people ??

Messages from Matthew are found here:

http://mattthewmessages.blogspot.com/ Or here:
www.matthewbooks.com

She channels her dead son.

And DW is completely awesome.

[mntruthseeker]

oh thanks Sarahmay................I remember her now


Actually I shouldn't of said BS...........its just the bringing up of his name.....she must actually know and discuss David then. It makes sense



The information she is getting............is the 2nd time I have been given the same message...............NO, not through channelling myself, but by another source


I am also under the impression that we need to higher our consciousness to go up to their level as they can not come down to ours. Not all of them anyhow..............The ones on 5th have difficulty coming down to 3rd.

We do still have alot to do. My heart goes out to all the "lightworkers" because they have much to accomplish and are working very hard on a daily basis


Viking I thank you for posting this here. I now recall seeing you posting this prior and have always felt the messages were good

Although the frequencies always come across as being much of the recievers own interpetation as this message clearly shows.

[FIIISH]

Thanks for sharing this viking.

I found it encouraging and informative.

I also think highly of David Wilcock.

[mntruthseeker]

First of all.................I am not putting down David Wilcock

I am simply saying to have information channelled and his name popping out is on the side of the reciever not the sender. It has been explained by David Icke that sometimes the transmission screws up and people say what they "think" they hear. Poor Blossom found that out. I believe she heard something and maybe they just played a trick on her or she just heard what she wanted to hear. Making sure it comes from more than one source is the right idea. I have a couple of friends that channel all of the time...........and I have seen their information come true...........BUT they have way more sources than just one. Who knows if she is really getting this from her son ? I'm sure this has been asked before.

I'm sure that someone in the 5th dimension is not tossing out names.

All and All the message is ONE that we all want to hear and believe in.

[Sarahmay]

I don't put a lot of credence in Matthew's messages, although I usually enjoy them. They are often recycled stuff that I have read in other places. But I think they are harmless and positive.

[giovonni]

Much~ of this resonates and is within my beliefs and accord.

[burgundia]

I like the message a lot. But why mentioning only Obama and not other leaders....I am suspecious here.....

[Carmen]

Ah!! A Lovely message. Just a comment to the naysayers of the messages Viking and Gareth are posting: When I first started on my spiritual journey, my spiritual inquiry, I remember very well attempting to share something of what I was learning with my local vicar. He stepped back from me as if I'd just told him that I'd joined a coven of Witches!!! I thought to myself then "You silly old fool, I will enquire into what I wish and no_one will delay or deny my searching mind to find the Truth for Me"

That cured me of religious dogma, although I have always kept the best of what religion taught me. I have had so many teachers through books, through channelling, and I have learnt soo much. But I still reserve the right of my free-will to explore and enquire into whatever I see that interests me. Doesnt matter if something I learn I find to be limiting later on. Actually this happens very infrequently nowadays. My God Within prompts me with the real stuff, for Me. Unless everyone demands this freedom of enquiry for themselves, we are back on the old paradigm of control.

This nonsense about channelling I find quite amusing. After all our bodies are just garments that our God animates and channels through!

There is much on this forum that does not interest me in the least, so I don't go there. I would never stop anyone else from doing so though. Thats up to them. Freedom in consciousness, freewill is sacresanct to me.

Love and Light

Carmen

[FIIISH]

I think it is wise to be cautious with channeled material and to check
it against your own guidance.

I understand where MNtruthseeker is coming
from regarding the specific mention of DW. It is unusual in my experience
for a channel to mention someone by name in that manner.

As always, take what resonates and leave the rest.

[mntruthseeker]

Originally Posted by FIIISH

I think it is wise to be cautious with channeled material and to check
it against your own guidance.

I understand where MNtruthseeker is coming
from regarding the specific mention of DW. It is unusual in my experience
for a channel to mention someone by name in that manner.

As always, take what resonates and leave the rest.

Thank you for that. My friends that channel constantly have never brought out any name. Obamas was mentioned also and to me that is also crazy. It makes it seem so unbelievable.


I love the message and it is just not coming from her , its being put out all over the net

Maybe, its the way that we get the word out to the Universe............that is a perfect, perfect way to bring about the reality we all want

So yes, its a beautiful message indeed

[Swanny]

I think the message is good but can't help wondering how much money she makes from all this

[Unified Serenity]

The message lost credibility in my book when it mentioned DW and Obama. Let's see, we have a known liar who thinks he actually deserves the accolades he gets and many who worship him. I don't think I will trust anything that lifts him up.

He's just one more blood sucker among many and not worthy to be adored and deified.

[burgundia]

Originally Posted by Unified Serenity

The message lost credibility in my book when it mentioned DW and Obama.
.

To me any message that mentions names of contemporary people loses credibility...

[waitinginthewings]

Its interesting that she mentions DW & Obama in the same breath. DW actually supports Obama, so that puts them both on the same team, whichever team that is?

[giovonni]

One should keep an open mind > pay no heed to names or events or personal predictions> these can change from moment to moment~ does it resonate within > should be one's real concern and or (self) interest. Once awake and aware of the probable possibilities> it is within the (our) collective consciousness > to manifest and achieve the desired outcome.

[Unified Serenity]

Originally Posted by giovonni

One should keep an open mind > pay no heed to names or events or personal predictions> these can change from moment to moment~ does it resonate within > should be one's real concern and or (self) interest. Once awake and aware of the probable possibilities> it is within the (our) collective consciousness > to manifest and achieve the desired outcome.

Like so much hear one must delve through the myriad of words to pick out the truth from lies. I do not reject the entire message, but I will have to read it a few times to see where the gems really and where the twists are. I do not trust whomever is channeling this info.