Go Back   Old Project Avalon Forum (ARCHIVE) > Project Camelot Forum > Project Camelot > Project Camelot General Discussion

Notices

Project Camelot General Discussion Reactions, feedback and suggestions on interviews, current events and experiences.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-20-2009, 05:27 PM   #1
Myplanet2
In The Mists
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Toronto
Posts: 1,133
Default Re: Camelot responds to St Clair's blurb

Why do those with the least understanding, claim the biggest voices?

Maybe Bill and Kerry should also create a "support your local illuminati" sub forum, and the "reptilian corner"?

How about putting these ideas into walk the talk dim wittedness:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Equal-time_rule

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fairness_Doctrine

It's B & K's group. They can do what they like. If someone stabs them in the back, they can pull their content. How many times did Michael St Clair mention his books in the Camelot interviews?

Why should they continue to promote Michael's work when he's taken to promoting them as little more than tools of the illuminati?

Freedom of speech must by it's nature include freedom to not speak. You are advocating enforced speech. B&K must keep St Clair's material on their site. That's not freedom of speech. If they let YOU tell them what they must have on their site, then must they also let the Mainstream media tell them what must be there? The Rockefellers? CFR? Builderbergers?CIA? It's their choice what they present.

If you got what you know of this situation with Bill, Kerry and Michael from this thread, then you have no idea what's going on, because most of it hasn't been said in this thread. And that might tell you something about these disembodied opinions being floated by the mal(mis)(un)informed.
Myplanet2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-2009, 05:37 PM   #2
Sarahmay
Avalon Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Sedona Arizona
Posts: 549
Default Re: Camelot responds to St Clair's blurb

Quote:
Originally Posted by Myplanet2 View Post
Why do those with the least understanding, claim the biggest voices?

Maybe Bill and Kerry should also create a "support your local illuminati" sub forum, and the "reptilian corner"?
Smile
Sarahmay is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-2009, 06:06 PM   #3
feeler
Avalon Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 360
Default Re: Camelot responds to St Clair's blurb

Quote:
Originally Posted by Myplanet2 View Post

Why should they continue to promote Michael's work when he's taken to promoting them as little more than tools of the illuminati?
You seem to exhibit the "an eye for eye" attitude...

Quote:
Originally Posted by Myplanet2 View Post
If you got what you know of this situation with Bill, Kerry and Michael from this thread, then you have no idea what's going on, because most of it hasn't been said in this thread.
I have no idea what's going on. Do you? We both should, should we?

And while we, as individuals, may not agree with everything presented on our site, we fully support freedom of thought and speech as well as the Quest for truth. --31 December 2008

-feeler
feeler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-2009, 06:50 PM   #4
feeler
Avalon Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 360
Default Re: Camelot responds to St Clair's blurb

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kathleen View Post
Maybe the quest for truth precludes them from keeping the stuff there....and why in the world would you think that Bill and Kerry should tell the public everything that is going on?They do not owe us anything. Just because they are public figures does not mean they owe us an explaination of their every thought and finding. This constant haranguing reminds me of papparazi.
Paparazzi? I'm only interested in the public comments or action either side takes. I respect the personal (private) life of either side.

The stuff being kept here might very well include information provided by the disinfo agents. How do you identify those in the quest for truth? The disinfo agents likely come in the form of the sweetest, and the most vulnerable person, in appearance. St. Clair (with his public criticism of K&B) doesn't fit the profile.

-feeler
feeler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-2009, 07:23 PM   #5
feeler
Avalon Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 360
Default Re: Camelot responds to St Clair's blurb

Some "experts" are sweeter than the others. And the vulnerability is hard to resist.


22. Manufacture a new truth. Create your own expert(s), group(s), author(s), leader(s) or influence existing ones willing to forge new ground via scientific, investigative, or social research or testimony which concludes favorably. In this way, if you must actually address issues, you can do so authoritatively.

-feeler
feeler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-21-2009, 02:08 AM   #6
orthodoxymoron
Avalon Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Lunar Base II
Posts: 3,093
Default Re: Camelot responds to St Clair's blurb

I just thought about something. When Billy Graham's organization had a problem with a bill, individual, organization, or company...it is my understanding, at least, that they paid whatever was owed(or claimed to be owed)...and just simply stopped doing business with that individual, organization, or company. No fighting. No comment. Nothing. They simply went quietly in another direction. There may be some real wisdom in that. No comment. No fighting. No invitations. No interviews. Nothing. It's very easy to second guess and criticize when one is not directly involved in a situation. However...just as a hypothetical...what if something like this happens again...and the previously posted interviews are left alone...but no further contact or comment is made regarding the problem individual? Both parties might just move on...without stirring up a hornets nest.

Last edited by orthodoxymoron; 04-21-2009 at 02:15 AM.
orthodoxymoron is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-21-2009, 04:11 AM   #7
feeler
Avalon Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 360
Default Re: Camelot responds to St Clair's blurb

Quote:
Originally Posted by orthodoxymoron View Post
I just thought about something. When Billy Graham's organization had a problem with a bill, individual, organization, or company...it is my understanding, at least, that they paid whatever was owed(or claimed to be owed)...and just simply stopped doing business with that individual, organization, or company. No fighting. No comment. Nothing. They simply went quietly in another direction. There may be some real wisdom in that. No comment. No fighting. No invitations. No interviews. Nothing. It's very easy to second guess and criticize when one is not directly involved in a situation. However...just as a hypothetical...what if something like this happens again...and the previously posted interviews are left alone...but no further contact or comment is made regarding the problem individual? Both parties might just move on...without stirring up a hornets nest.

orthodoxymoron, what you are suggesting is called co-existing peacefully. Great idea.

Now that K&B retracted their endorsement of St. Clair, I am left to wonder which part of St. Clair's past interviews I should re-evaluate.

-feeler
feeler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-21-2009, 07:47 PM   #8
waitinginthewings
Avalon Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: BC. Canada
Posts: 1,340
Default Re: Camelot responds to St Clair's blurb

This subject has now been debated to death......can we just bury the hatchet now and move on pleaseeeeeeeeeeeeeee.
waitinginthewings is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-21-2009, 09:15 PM   #9
franciejones
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 307
Default Re: Camelot responds to St Clair's blurb

As an interesting side note to all of this...St. Clair has just today posted links for two Camelot presentations/interviews on his Facebook page. I do not know if he maintains his own Facebook page, but I thought it a bit strange to see them posted by him. Is he trying to "say he is sorry?"

Just a weird thing I noticed. I had a "hmmm" reaction to it
franciejones is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-22-2009, 04:42 AM   #10
cantaloupe
Avalon Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 151
Default Re: Camelot responds to St Clair's blurb

:dead thread?
cantaloupe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-22-2009, 04:44 AM   #11
dagon
Avalon Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Glen Ellen Ca
Posts: 611
Default Re: Camelot responds to St Clair's blurb

dagon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-22-2009, 05:01 AM   #12
Luminari
Avalon Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Australia
Posts: 2,570
Default Re: Camelot responds to St Clair's blurb

This is a tragic love story right?

The intuition I get from this whole scenario is that St Clair has/had romantic feelings for Kerry and viewed Bill as an obstacle or competition.

This was gleaned from body language and other things I picked up..

I may be totally wrong but please dont attack me if you disagree.

The people here saying nasty things about St Clair and 'I disliked him from the start' etc how would you feel about people being so quick to judge you.

Zen of Stars is a great book, at least he did something positive we can agree on (if you even read it that is).

Peace out,

L

Last edited by Luminari; 04-22-2009 at 05:04 AM.
Luminari is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-22-2009, 07:06 AM   #13
feeler
Avalon Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 360
Default Re: Camelot responds to St Clair's blurb

Quote:
Originally Posted by Luminari View Post
This is a tragic love story right?

The intuition I get from this whole scenario is that St Clair has/had romantic feelings for Kerry and viewed Bill as an obstacle or competition.

This was gleaned from body language and other things I picked up..

I may be totally wrong but please dont attack me if you disagree.

The people here saying nasty things about St Clair and 'I disliked him from the start' etc how would you feel about people being so quick to judge you.

Zen of Stars is a great book, at least he did something positive we can agree on (if you even read it that is).

Peace out,

L

Luminari,

Are you serious?

Do you know whether Kerry was ever invited to join St. Clair's Radiant Zone?

If I were Bill, being human, besides erasing St. Clair's interviews from this site, I would try to erase St. Clair from Kerry's memory.

Just kidding.

-feeler
feeler is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:10 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Project Avalon