Distortions of the truth, (RANT)

[sun-toon´]

Originally Posted by tone3jaguar

That is cool, we all have our own paradigms about the other side. The great thing is that none of us is right and none of us are wrong either. Each person decides for them selves what is important for them to learn about. If the details about the structure of dimensions in this universe do not seem important or relevant, then I would not focus on them either. It would be more important for you to focus on things that you are naturally attracted to and excited about.

I think you're misunderstanding me. I am very interested in dimensional structure, I just don't see it the same way you do. But as you say, it's true that we all have our own paradigms and can only intuit the way we do, which goes back to my comment about the oxymoronic nature of being an authority in the realms of woo-hoo. I don't see any way to prove any of this stuff, and I'll concede that it's possible that your view is correct and mine is not. If I had to put money on it though, it would be that neither of us has clarity, but we're doing our best under the circumstances.

Originally Posted by tone3jaguar

However, for an individual like myself that wishes to communicate with higher forms of consciousness in order to bring new helpful information into this world it is imperative that I understand how to make sure my info is not being tainted by negative consciousness. Part of this understanding comes in the form of being able to determine what level of ascension and polarity the entity(s) I am working with are.

I use different means of determining the the level and intent of a channeled entity, but not dowsing or the polarity thing you mention. I find that much information that had a positive feel in the past, now has proven itself to be some positive information mixed with disinformation...the case being that I've expanded and the information was not true enough to come along. I assume this process will continue, and that what's cutting edge right now will also prove itself to be various packets of truth mixed with misleading info.

Originally Posted by Luminari

Well you will be missing all of the wisdom and love from the cutting edge of consciousness research. If you aren't supporting David's work AT ALL then you have some dark agenda, or ego issues.

I don't think czymra means that he's tuned out to love and wisdom or consciousness research, only that he doesn't trust DW to provide him with the roadmap. We all have holes that need filled, and we resonate with what brings us closer to equilibrium.
And Luminari...everyone is entitled to an opinion.
I'm curious as to why this discussion would give you the creeps. It seems to me that it's a pretty objective exchange of opinions about an increasingly influential individual. It might be good for Wilcock to stop by and read it.

EpiphaMe: It is DW's forum and he can act as overlordly as he wants, but in IMO, the stifling of all opinion that's not exactly like his own shows a different energetic polarity than he purports to be projecting though his investigative work. One wouldn't expect to find this the fine print of his forum rules.

It's good that tone3jaguar posted this here. We need as much transparency as possible around the information we receive. The days of spiritual leaders not walking the walk they talk is over. Humans have been dealing with that for thousands of years, and even though it's high time we finally learn to become our own saviors, there will always be people out front. It's not too much to demand that they be who they say they are.