|
|
![]() |
#1 |
I dont need a label !
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: The Shire of Wilt
Posts: 2,889
|
![]()
Not this ******** again.
![]() No one is better than anyone else, we are all spirits here on Earth to learn our own lessons in our chosen lifestyles. I could claim to being an indigo but I'm not up my own **** so I wont. Anyway ther's no such thing, so just get on with your lives and stop being pompous twats ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
Avalon Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Texas
Posts: 86
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
I dont need a label !
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: The Shire of Wilt
Posts: 2,889
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Avalon Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Texas
Posts: 86
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Avalon Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Central Coast, Australia
Posts: 34
|
![]()
But is taking it as making you something special a bad thing. I don't know about everyone else, but I've been made to feel my entire life like I was less than nothing, that I didn't fit in and was nothing special. The idea that I could be something special and with a special destiny is refreshingly and significantly affirming.
I say why not enjoy the fact that we are special and separate, as guides to others to try and show them the way so that they can get there too in the end. I mean sociaety already excludes us and treats us as being different, so why not make that excusion be a positive thing instead of a negative thing ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Avalon Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Earth
Posts: 97
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Avalon Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Gaia, Solas System, Milkyway
Posts: 398
|
![]()
i dont really care what anyone posts here anymore, consider this post abandonded of its original intent, i reallly dont care. Ive enough to worry about my own problems let alone bring more on myslef
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Avalon Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Venezuela
Posts: 11
|
![]()
Sherab, no one said that just because you're Indigo you need to talk about your problems. Just seems like you're flaunting it and dismissing everyone else. You can cope with getting over your problems? Good for you. Though there are some that need and Want support from others who know exactly what they have to go through. Ever considered that?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
Avalon Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Ont. CANADA
Posts: 1,043
|
![]()
My son definately fits the definition.
In the last week his intuitiveness has increased. He gets weird sensations when we discuss certain things going on or predicted. We talk about dreams that I have had and some of them cause him to get weird feelings. examples: When we talked about the Oct 14 th event he felt nothing. I showed him the Mayan calendar and something clicked in him and he said "what is that?". He felt the urge to go and research more about it. I would like to know whether any other of you that feel you are an Indigo are feeling similar increased sensations. ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
Avalon Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: So. Cal. U.S.
Posts: 4,205
|
![]()
Don't be an idiot swanney, it's not about being better or worse, it's about defining if you are indigo. Did you read the thread from the begining? I hate what I call thread jumpers that just pop around putting their two cents in without reading the thread.
Last edited by Dantheman62; 10-10-2008 at 12:11 AM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 | |
Avalon Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Gaia, Solas System, Milkyway
Posts: 398
|
![]() Quote:
Yes actually some people are 'better' then others. My source of reference here is the common dictionary that we all aknowledge to be true, so this isnt based on speculation ; Its based on fact In the english dictionary 'positive' has many definitions. And all of them are of a good nature, a better and more constructive nature then negativity ; pos·i·tive ; adj. 1. Characterized by or displaying certainty, acceptance, or affirmation: a positive answer; positive criticism. 2. Measured or moving forward or in a direction of increase or progress. 3. Explicitly or openly expressed or laid down: a positive demand. 4. Admitting of no doubt; irrefutable: positive proof. 5. a. Very sure; confident: I'm positive he's right. See Synonyms at sure. b. Overconfident; dogmatic. 6. Formally or arbitrarily determined; prescribed. 7. Concerned with practical rather than theoretical matters. 8. Composed of or characterized by the presence of particular qualities or attributes; real. 9. Philosophy a. Of or relating to positivism. b. Of or relating to laws imposed by human authority rather than by nature or reason alone: "the glaring discrepancy between American positive law and natural rights" David Brion Davis. c. Of or relating to religion based on revelation rather than on nature or reason alone. 10. Informal Utter; absolute: a positive darling. 11. Mathematics a. Relating to or designating a quantity greater than zero. b. Relating to or designating the sign (+). c. Relating to or designating a quantity, number, angle, or direction opposite to another designated as negative. 12. Physics Relating to or designating an electric charge of a sign opposite to that of an electron. 13. Medicine Indicating the presence of a particular disease, condition, or organism: a positive test for pregnancy. 14. Biology Indicating or characterized by response or motion toward the source of a stimulus, such as light: positive tropism. 15. Having the areas of light and dark in their original and normal relationship, as in a photographic print made from a negative. 16. Grammar Of, relating to, or being the simple uncompared degree of an adjective or adverb, as opposed to either the comparative or superlative. 17. Driven by or generating power directly through intermediate machine parts having little or no play: positive drive. n. 1. An affirmative element or characteristic. 2. Mathematics A quantity greater than zero. 3. Physics A positive electric charge. 4. A photographic image in which the lights and darks appear as they do in nature. 5. Grammar a. The uncompared degree of an adjective or adverb. b. A word in this degree. 6. Music A division of some pipe organs, similar in sound to the great but smaller and less powerful. When we look at the word negative we can see that it posses very few traits that would be considered more constructive or better then those which define positivity. They are considered worse ; neg·a·tive (ng-tv) adj. 1. a. Expressing, containing, or consisting of a negation, refusal, or denial: gave a negative answer to our request. b. Indicating opposition or resistance: a negative reaction to the new advertising campaign. 2. Lacking positive or constructive features, especially: a. Unpleasant; disagreeable: had a negative experience on his first job. b. Gloomy; pessimistic: a negative outlook. c. Unfavorable or detrimental: a negative review; a negative effect on the child's development. d. Hostile or disparaging; malicious: ran a negative campaign against her opponent. 3. Medicine Not indicating the presence of a particular disease, condition, or organism. 4. Logic Designating a proposition that denies agreement between a subject and its predicate. 5. Mathematics a. Of or relating to a quantity less than zero. b. Of or relating to the sign (-). c. Of or relating to a quantity to be subtracted from another. d. Of or relating to a quantity, number, angle, velocity, or direction in a sense opposite to another of the same magnitude indicated or understood to be positive. 6. Physics a. Of or relating to an electric charge of the same sign as that of an electron, indicated by the symbol (-). b. Of or relating to a body having an excess of electrons. 7. Chemistry Of or relating to an ion, the anion, that is attracted to a positive electrode. 8. Biology Moving or turning away from a stimulus, such as light: a negative tropism. n. 1. A statement or act indicating or expressing a contradiction, denial, or refusal. 2. a. A statement or act that is highly critical of another or of others: campaign advertising that was based solely on negatives. b. Something that lacks all positive, affirmative, or encouraging features; an element that is the counterpoint of the positive: "Life is full of overwhelming odds. You can't really eliminate the negatives but you can diminish them" Art Linkletter. c. A feature or characteristic that is not deemed positive, affirmative, or desirable: "As voters get to know his liberal views, his negatives will rise" Richard M. Nixon. 3. Grammar A word or part of a word, such as no, not, or non-, that indicates negation. See Usage Note at double negative. 4. The side in a debate that contradicts or opposes the question being debated. 5. a. An image in which the light areas of the object rendered appear dark and the dark areas appear light. b. A film, plate, or other photographic material containing such an image. 6. Mathematics A negative quantity. tr.v. neg·a·tived, neg·a·tiv·ing, neg·a·tives 1. To refuse to approve; veto. 2. To deny; contradict. 3. To demonstrate to be false; disprove. 4. To counteract or neutralize. The word negativity doesnt contain very many definitions that could be considered good. To say that negativity, or negative people are better the positivity or positive people is a contradiction of terms. Our universe strives to be better. The organisms on this planet strive to become something more, the caterpillar strives to become a butterfly. This is evolution, evolution goes in a positive direction. When i use the term indigo, im using it as a reference point. Im not just here to help them but also to help people who are of a positive nature. Indigos are positive, their deepest negativities stem from their very positive characteristics. It would be correct to say that using indigos as a reference point from where i can talk to people who are of a positive nature may seem a bit like a massive generalisation but i know for a fact that people who are of true positive nature will resonate with the whole concept and its the best possible term i can think of that has this effect to draw positive people in to come together and sit down and talk. As a people we have lost this connection to one another, i would like to see this built up but personally i would much rather build these connections with positive rather then negative people. There are already quite a few who responded negativly to this thread. It expresses your true nature. Ive also seen quite a few who have responded positivly and in a rational respectfull manner so i can tell the difference between who and who i do not want to share my time with. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
Avalon Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Gaia, Solas System, Milkyway
Posts: 398
|
![]()
So.. if you think George Walker Bush is "better" then us then your not on my team buddy. We are better then him. We want whats good for this planet and he just wants to see it destroyed with his reptilian brained mentality.
That is the only instance where i would call Indigos 'better' then anyone else.We are all better the some of the murderous scum out there and so are you. Not everyone is equal, everyone is different. Everyone has their flaws, but i assure you, i consider myself much better and superior then the likes of Hitler. Last edited by 2infinityandbeyond; 10-11-2008 at 03:45 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 | |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
![]() Quote:
Who is to say that these peoples actions are not necessary for the whole of humanity to evolve. It is the catalyst for change. When a person has nothing, they have nothing to lose and everything to gain. And its the same for the whole of humanity. Think of it this way, we are all allowed to be exposed to these "negative" events... and there must be a reason for it. The more I see the posts of self proclaimed indigos... the more I see people who are suffering, and are looking for something to explain it. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#16 | |
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Spain
Posts: 248
|
![]() Quote:
i don´t think that he´s being negative and elitist, he just attacks reality with the weapons he has at his disposal against the things he sees as a threat to his agenda. His purpose is to defend the idea of life he has the way he believe he have to. Bluntly, that is the mathematical equation exposed. but from my perspective compassion is just sinonimous of being judgmental. When there is pain, there is evolution, when there is not pain, there is not evolution. the indigo issue is nothing i would discuss here as it has been already discussed. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#17 |
Avalon Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 277
|
![]()
2INFINITY...hey just leave these morans to themselves. SWANNY AND THE OTHER just need attention like brats that they are. don't let their negativity affect you. but i have to add:
swanny...could you go to another site and give your unwanted 2 cents. in fact it's not even worth that. read the first statement at the beginning of this thread--MORAN!... you have nothing of value to add. you are very insecure and upset you're not an indigo. you just create negativity!!! you don't agree, SO WHAT, JUST LEAVE THE POST!!!!! i can't believe someone like you is even on this forum. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#18 | |
Avalon Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Hideing From The Clandestine Dark Suit's!
Posts: 190
|
![]() Quote:
I agree. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#19 | |
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Spain
Posts: 248
|
![]() Quote:
so i got a warning point by trowing an insult. Yeah, i see how this XXXX works. At least i see why i "waste" my time here, in this forum: there is nothing better on this planet; this is the cutting edge. ![]() Last edited by Racsouran; 10-12-2008 at 07:04 AM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#20 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
![]()
.................................................. .................................................. .................................................. ...................................
Last edited by NatureGirl; 10-13-2008 at 07:51 AM. |
![]() |
![]() |
#21 |
I dont need a label !
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: The Shire of Wilt
Posts: 2,889
|
![]()
Wow!!!! Dolphin you seem to have a problem mate, so in your reality no one is entitled to an opinion unless it fits with yours??
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#22 | |
Avalon Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Norway
Posts: 413
|
![]()
I found a nice little article with a good definition of a socalled "star seed" (I prefer that term to "indigo"):
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#23 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
![]()
look I am not trying to win anyone over here... the ego has been around since the beginning, and cannot be changed unless its done by the individual themselves (this goes for both sides of the debate). All I care about really is that you feel good... if being an indigo resonates with you then roll with it. Use it to make the world a better place. My only problem is that labels often cause people to break apart as opposed to unify. If you use the indigo label to unify... then by all means do it.
But if a person uses it to throw themselves pity parties, blame establishment and everyone for all their problems, and lives their lives in a degenerative manner... then they are wasting their time and energy. And most likely draining others peoples time and energy the process. P.S. Sanat I have heard about this before, and see it as a total possibility. |
![]() |
![]() |
#24 |
Avalon Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Colorado,USA
Posts: 108
|
![]()
=
= In a way everyone is a Star Seed. Our Sun is a Star. Each of us is in a sense is a Seed of our Sun. The Hopi say something like seeds of the new life are sprouting in the souls of humble people and the same seeds are being planted in the stars. And this relates to the coming Fifth World. = = |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#25 |
Avalon Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Norway
Posts: 413
|
![]()
Yes, in the absolute sense everyone is a "soul/being" which came from Source and are on a journey back to Source. I refer often to Hawkins scale of consciousness 1-1000. I think this scale can be a bit misleading for the competative ego. It could perhaps better be expressed as a negative scale like this:
0 is the top of the scale instead of 1000 and -1000 represents the lowest point on the scale. What I mean is that the scale is always negative until the journey ends in which you reach the zero-point. The point being that everyone has embarked on a journey from 0 into "negativity/dualism" and some has choosen to go deeper into the negative scale than others. Sooner or later all will return to the zero-point with a lot of wisdom gained on the way... However, I do think the intention of this thread is a bit more "down to earth" and not so "absolute" as this. But what the heck right ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|