Camelot responds to St Clair's blurb

[Stargazer1965]

Originally Posted by Myplanet2

That's not really what I was saying. My comment was in regards to opinions raised which then present themselves unsupported, or go off in search of supporting "facts". There are "facts" available, I'm sure, but comments like ("Bill and Kerry's credibility were not questioned UNTIL they censored St Clair...I have no idea who St Clair is or what he's about...but he has the right to be heard") don't demonstrate evidence of having gone off to search for any facts. They indicate an opinion exists all on it's own.

Hardly inspiring of discussion.

What's a fact? What's an opinion? What's the difference?

Oh I've watched St Clair....I don't agree with him and don't get a good feeling but I still take it all in. I can't stand from a lofty perch and say this person can be heard but not that one. I'm sorry when you form a site like this you sign up for a few things....the first being when folks come to express themselves...They own the site ...not the one paying for the domain name. It grows into something more...or something less. Would it have been so bad just to stay above it all and not post "This guy isn't our friend anymore...or this one" Just to leave it alone and it would relegate itself to where it needs to be....or rise to what it should.