Icke: Manipulation by PTB Iran elections et al... Soros etc

[Avid]

http://www.rense.com/general86/ickk.htm

Hello all ...

Talk about deja vu. Was I watching protests in the Ukraine this week? Or Georgia? It certainly looked like it. But, no, it was Iran. I knew because the colour was different.

In Georgia in 2003 the colour was red, or 'rose', and in the Ukraine in 2004 it was orange. In Iran this week, it is green. Apart from that, the same modus operandi was playing out once again orchestrated by the usual suspects hiding in the shadows.

Most people see events in terms of polarities. It is either/or and black and white. For example, you are either for something or against it. Yet rarely is any situation so polarised, so clear-cut, and unless we look at the shades of grey we are never going to see what is truly going on.

To say the protests in Iran this week have been covertly manipulated by the United States, United Kingdom and Israel is not to say that I support the Iranian president, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, or the 'Supreme Leader' dictatorship that really runs the country. Nor does it mean that I do not support the right of Iranian people to say what they feel about an election they believe to be rigged.

But there is another story to tell here that involves American, British and Israeli intelligence and the billionaire financier and Obama backer, George Soros. This intelligence trio and Soros have a common connecting force: the House of Rothschild. ..... much more on link

The web is unravelling so quickly on here - let's stop these 'swines' via the soft option - publicity here, on the internet!
Let's call in their 'bluffs', like the Chinese wanting REAL gold and not just more promisory worthless paper. ...err - where is it? Certainly not enough in 'Fort Knox' - so someone MUST have sneaked it away...

Let's look at Ezekiel Emanuel and what he is really promulgating - to end 'worthless lives' (in WHO's opinion...)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yCYfWrg4WKY

Do you realise this maniac is the brother of the MOSSAD Obama right hand man Rahm Emanuel (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=slHtIT0EPcs) ... THIS STINKS!!!! AIPAC STINKS!!!

Now then - to complete the vicious circle of inhumanity-to-man, common denominators Emanuel brothers/Soros/Bilderberg I've found innumerable links, but can anyone else help me here?
http://afteramerica.wordpress.com/20...death-council/

It's nauseous stuff - how would YOU choose...?
I do believe SOROS and his ilk really try to destabilise for profit.
If only those poor Iranians who have been twittered and duped could see, the emancipation for women will come, but NOT if the serial manipulators have anything todo with it! After all - a 'happy country' has strength - not servitude...

I've read and heard a fair bit about this. For instance, the actual bombing of buildings was not part of either faction. The shooting of the girl who's now rather famous is suspect - something about the police having only rubber bullets. This was in Salon:

HALT CHENEY'S AND NOW OBAMA'S COVERT IRAN OPERATIONS
Friday, June 19, 2009
http://blogs.salon.com/0002255/2009/06/19.html

In March of 2002 Dick Cheney appointed his own daughter Elizabeth to head a shadow operation (ISOG) whose covert purpose was to fund dissident groups in Iran ~ money which may have been used to fund and arm terrorists. Obama has now evidently picked up where the Cheney's left off : Allen L Roland

If you have any doubt that a shadow Cheney presidency existed during the last eight years that cast its evil over everything from the 9/11cover-up to Quantanamo ~ than picture Dick Cheney appointing his own daughter in 2002 to head up a secretive organization in Iran whose purpose was to fund terrorists ~ and which reported directly to Darth Vader himself, Dick Cheney. And why would Cheney appoint his own daughter ? Because she was the only person he could trust on his, self declared, journey to the dark side for she certainly would not testify against him. They both are now neck deep in deception and lies which is why they are openly defending their actions together on the mainstream TV circuit.

On April 11, 2006 I posted a column entitled CHENEY'S SECRET IRAN OPERATING GROUP ~ in which I summarized How the Office of Special Plans ( OSP ) fed tainted intelligence directly to Dick Cheney in the run up to the war with Iraq with the objective of regime change.

How also the Iran-Syria Operations Group (ISOG), was set up by Dick Cheney's daughter with the same objective of regime change in Iran ~ with a direct line to Dick Cheney.

How the real objective of OSP was to justify a war with Iraq which was most likely the case with ISOG ~ to promote a war or regime change with Iran.

There can no longer be any doubts as to who was running this country and who George W Bush answered to.

I included an article from The American Progress Report which stated ~ " The State Department's Bureau of Near Eastern Affairs is disgruntled by the Bush team's efforts to run its own Iran shop and skirt the traditional bureaucracy. The administration's pre-Iraq war creations of the White House Iraq Group (WHIG) and the Pentagon's Office of Special Plans (OSP) may suggest one possible answer for why the administration feels the need to set up a secretive Iran operating group.

OSP was created to cull intelligence to make the strongest possible case for war with Iraq, while WHIG helped market the war based on the selective intelligence the administration collected. Cheney is operating with more than $75 million at her disposal to ostensibly promote democracy in Iran." http://blogs.salon.com/0002255/2006/04/11.html

Now let's fast forward to 2009 and ask this question ~ Did Obama dismantle the notorious and secretive ISOG which was dedicated to regime change in Iran regardless of the methods or consequences ?

Of course not, which explains Obama's present silence regarding Iran, and Steve Weissman,TRUTHOUT, picks it up from there with his timely and perceptive article Iran: Who's Diddling Democracy?

Excerpt: "Back in 2007, ABC News reported that President George W. Bush had signed a secret "Presidential finding" authorizing the CIA to mount covert "black" operations to destabilize the Iranian government ... The plan had the strong backing of Vice President Dick Cheney, National Security Adviser Steve Hadley and Deputy National Security Adviser Elliott Abrams. As ABC noted, Abrams had earlier pled guilty to withholding information from Congress about efforts to destabilize the Sandinista government in Nicaragua during the Iran-contra affair of the 1980s... The New Yorker's Seymour Hersh subsequently confirmed the story, reporting that the Presidential finding focused on "on undermining Iran's nuclear ambitions and trying to undermine the government through regime change." http://www.informationclearinghouse....ticle20203.htm

"Flash forward to the new presidency of Barack Obama. Did he and his CIA chief Leon Panetta cancel the destabilization program? Not that I can find. The tea leaves are murky, but they suggest that, so far at least, Team Obama remains wedded to the Bush-Cheney-Abrams destabilization of Iran.... According to Ken Timmerman, the executive director of the right-wing Foundation for Democracy in Iran ~ the Persian Service of Voice of America (VOA) clearly sided with the anti-Ahmadinejad candidate Mir Hossein Mousavi against those dissident groups who wanted to boycott the election entirely, the position Timmerman favored... Timmerman also saw the branding of Mousavi's "green revolution" as evidence that the US government was using its National Endowment for Democracy to support the former prime minister Mousavi . "The National Endowment for Democracy has spent millions of dollars during the past decade promoting 'color' revolutions in places such as Ukraine and Serbia, training political workers in modern communications and organizational techniques," Timmerman wrote on the right-wing newsmax.com. "Some of that money appears to have made it into the hands of pro-Mousavi groups, who have ties to non-governmental organizations outside Iran that the National Endowment for Democracy funds."

Weissman concludes by writing ~ " Does my reading of the tea leaves prove conclusively that the Obama administration was hell-bent on regime change? Not conclusively, but all the evidence points in that direction, especially now that many extremely reputable scholars are suggesting that Ahmadinejad probably did win more than a majority of the votes cast... Ahmadinejad is a very bad guy, as I have recently written elsewhere. But our opposition to him does not justify meddling in another country's election while proclaiming "universal democratic values."

So there you have it, Iran was in Cheney's gunsights for some time and he and his daughter Elizabeth's covert actions in Iran must be investigated ~ particularly in light of the current chaos in Iran and our part in covertly promoting it under the guise of Democracy. But more importantly, the Obama administration has evidently picked up where the Cheney's left off ~ and it must be halted immediately.

Allen L Roland http://blogs.salon.com/0002255/2009/06/19.html

Allen L Roland is available for comments, interviews, speaking engagements and private consultations ( allen@allenroland.com )
Allen L Roland is a practicing psychotherapist, author and lecturer who also shares a daily political and social commentary on his weblog and website allenroland.com He also guest hosts a monthly national radio show TRUTHTALK on www.conscioustalk.net

[Dr MAG]

WHISTLEBLOWERS STAND FOR TRUTH ON ALL SUBJECTS!!

Tehran's prosecutor general's office has said that some armed saboteurs opened fire on civilians and killed people in post-election violence in Tehran. "A number of Tehrani citizens were shot dead by unknown vandals Saturday night," said the office on Monday. It was not the policy of the government to kill people; it was aware of the subversion of paid agents and anti-Government individuals by US money, stirring the people, but it did not apparently have a handle on how these Iranian destabilzation funds would take the form of dispersion of mobile phones, social networking and Twitter to fast stir, inform and gather, while meanwhile paid assassins also lurked. Listen to radio interviews on www.thefrenchconnection.com between David Bradley Smith and Ognir.


Commentators "explaining" the Iran elections [as a fraud are often not objective and] based on their own illusions, delusions, emotions, and vested interests. Whether or not the poll results predicting Ahmadinejad's win are sound, there is, so far, no evidence beyond surmise that the election was stolen. However, there are credible reports that the CIA has been working for two years to destabilize the Iranian government. - Craig Roberts

Commentators like David Wilcock calling the Iranian woman who was killed some kind of saintly icon and harbinger of raising in consciousness in Iran are so wide off the mark it isn't even funny.

The truth is we need to raise our consciousnesses about IS how far and deep the web of deceit throttles our media and media reporting. We should be fully grasping the fact by now we are in a world under siege by a extremely hazardous well-funded, crafty mind-set that will not stop (in its mind) until it achieves Full Spectrum Dominance of the Entire World; Totalitarian Democracy in the New World Order.

Whether you don't think you like Iranian politics, or the inappropriate clothes ayatollahs wear, or how enmasse the people bow to the ground, or you hate the hijab, and foreign ideas of local justice; how many can claim to know anything about Iran except what the full spectrum, almost media-blackout on what you can know and how you can know it, continues its superhighway march into your heads and loins?

It's easy to jump on reported abuses in the Iranian world, but hold on, they haven't being playing out preemptive strikes with deep attacks and deaths of hundreds of thousands of civilians as now reported in Iraq, or been dropping depleted plutonium warheads into non-warring countrysides splaying cancer and immune breakdown in vast numbers of innocent populations. Have they? Or for that matter, deploying experimental drones, operated by video controllers back in the US, and dropping bombs on hamlets in North Pakistan, killing hundreds of innocent civilians. The theatre of war looks more and more like a game in a gameplanner's head.

Better understand the devil at home rather than peer over our neighbour's fence and tell them all about theirs. When anyone talks of consciousness raising, they ought to be raising their own bar. Do not follow any guru who is blind to the history of distortions playing out daily and which has not ceased.
Waking Up is more than realizing from the corner of one eye that you have been asleep.


“On May 23, 2007, Brian Ross and Richard Esposito reported on ABC News: “The CIA has received secret presidential approval to mount a covert “black” operation to destabilize the Iranian government, current and former officials in the intelligence community tell ABC News.”

On May 27, 2007, the London Telegraph independently reported: “Mr. Bush has signed an official document endorsing CIA plans for a propaganda and disinformation campaign intended to destabilize, and eventually topple, the theocratic rule of the mullahs.”

A few days previously, the Telegraph reported on May 16, 2007, that Bush administration neocon warmonger John Bolton told the Telegraph that a US military attack on Iran would “be a ‘last option’ after economic sanctions and attempts to foment a popular revolution had failed.”

On June 29, 2008, Seymour Hersh reported in the New Yorker: “Late last year, Congress agreed to a request from President Bush to fund a major escalation of covert operations against Iran, according to current and former military, intelligence, and congressional sources. These operations, for which the President sought up to four hundred million dollars, were described in a Presidential Finding signed by Bush, and are designed to destabilize the country’s religious leadership.” - Paul Craig Roberts


“According to the journalist Seymour Hersh, writing in the New Yorker last year, covert operations by the CIA and the Joint Special Operations Command were used to support the PJAK Kurdish dissident group in northern Iran, the disaffected ethnic Arab minority in Khuzestan in the south-west, and militant Baluchi Sunni Muslim separatists in the south-east, bordering Pakistan.

While not officially acknowledged or disavowed in the U.S., the covert programme has been repeatedly linked by Iran to ongoing violence, bomb attacks and assassinations in all three areas, as well as to the main external opposition group, the Mojahedin-e-Khalq, which is allegedly funded and armed by the U.S. Iran also occasionally claims to have evidence of involvement by Israel’s Mossad spy agency and British intelligence.

Although the problem can be overstated, Iranian leaders of all political complexions have reason to worry..." - Simon Tisdall www.globalresearch.ca.

The protests in Tehran no doubt have many sincere participants. The protests also have the hallmarks of the CIA orchestrated protests in Georgia and Ukraine. It requires total blindness not to see this.

...Neoconservative Kenneth Timmerman wrote the day before the election [in Iran] that “there’s talk of a ‘green revolution’ in Tehran. ..Timmerman goes on to write that “the National Endowment for Democracy has spent millions of dollars promoting ‘color’ revolutions . . . Timmerman’s own neocon Foundation for Democracy is “a private, non-profit organization established in 1995 with grants from the National Endowment for Democracy (NED), to promote democracy and internationally-recognized standards of human rights in Iran.”- Paul Craig Roberts, Assistant Secretary of the Treasury, Reagan administration.

Meanwhile, carrying the flag of “democracy” to other countries, FEMA camps are built in the US, swine flu mutants are hatched in laboratories like Baxter; there are alien cover-ups and supreme technology swindles, and possible dangerous mandatory vaccinations up next, plus the covered up and ignored targeting of mothers and little children in Gaza in the recent "operation Cast Lead". If there are gods; they are surely crying now.

It is mandatory to understand the devil we are just beginning to find out about in our own midst and keep learning.
In time we will also have a better idea of Iran at a deeper level. Then we may begin to understand some of the real battles of consciousness being played out beneath surface events in the struggle to destroy or save our world before time robs us of the moment we had to realize our own full spectrum awareness of true events.

Kerry Cassidy recently on Whistleblower radio has unfortunately been casting aspersions at a war she does not understand in Iran and at its Westernly-perceived unappealing President. It would be better for her not to comment until she has more understanding, otherwise disinformation only results, not truth or whistleblowing. I am on the Camelot Roundtable 1000, and committed to my own personal mandate of full spectrum truth and awareness.


Craig Roberts commenting, article at www.globalresearch.ca:
"There is no doubt that there is a significant segment of Iranian society, concentrated around major metropolitan areas, and comprising many young people, that passionately yearns for social freedoms. They are understandably angry because their candidate came up short. But it would be a huge mistake to read this domestic disagreement as an “uprising” against the Islamic Republic, or as a call to embark on a foreign policy that would accommodate the West at the expense of Iran’s nuclear program or its vital interests.

Nations display respect to other nations only when they respect their sovereignty. If any nation, for instance, were to dictate the United States’ economic, foreign or social policies, Americans would be indignant. When France, under President Chirac opposed the American adventure in Iraq in 2003, some U.S. Congressmen renamed a favorite fast food from French Fries to “Freedom Fries.” They made it known that the French were unwelcome in the U.S.

The U.S. has a legacy of interference in Iran’s internal affairs notably when it toppled the democratically elected government of Prime Minister Mohammad Mossadegh in 1953. This act, of which most Americans are unaware, is ingrained in every Iranian from childhood. It is the main cause of much of their perpetual anger at the U.S. It took 56 years for an American president to acknowledge this illegal act, when Obama did so earlier this month in Cairo.

Therefore, it would be a colossal mistake to interfere in Iran’s internal affairs yet again. President Obama is wise to leave this matter to be resolved by the Iranians themselves. Political expediency by the Republicans or pro-Israel Democrats [and] the media appears to be a blatant attempt to demonize Iran and its current leadership, in order to justify any future military attack by Israel if Iran does not give up its nuclear ambition.

President Obama’s declarations in Cairo ... said, “I recognize it will be hard to overcome decades of mistrust, but we will proceed with courage, rectitude, and resolve. There will be many issues to discuss between our two countries, and we are willing to move forward without preconditions on the basis of mutual respect.”

But the first sign of respect is to let the Iranians sort out their differences without...interference."

[Northern Boy]

Originally Posted by Dr MAG

WHISTLEBLOWERS STAND FOR TRUTH ON ALL SUBJECTS!! But the first sign of respect is to let the Iranians sort out their differences without...interference."

Thanks for the post Dr.Mag the last line from your post says it all .

[dolphin]

dr. mag... cliff high in one of his interviews fortells of the zionists (usa supported) wreaking havoc, killing millions w an attack on iran in the next few years. i guess depleted uraniam from one of the bombs will devastate the air which will ciruclate over that area and around the globle.

sickening!

[peaceandlove]

Don't Mess with Iran's Evolutionary Process

By Philip Giraldi
Published 06/26/09

Philip M. Giraldi, Ph.D. is the Francis Walsingham Fellow at The American Conservative Defense Alliance (www.ACDAlliance.org) and a former CIA counter-terrorism specialist and military intelligence officer.

Everyone is looking for something to say about Iran. The neo-conservatives are predictably hailing the march of democracy on the streets of Tehran for reasons of their own, while hawks like Senators John McCain and Lindsay Graham are calling on the Obama Administration to do something to help anyone tagged as a reformer. More moderate voices are generally supporting President Barack Obama's initial show of restraint -- avoiding any open support of either side -- and only condemning the violence because it is disproportionate due to the suffering it has caused. Still others are calling on the United States to avoid any interference of any kind. The non-interventionists themselves fall into two camps: the constitutionalists and libertarians believe that interfering in other people's quarrels is intrinsically problematical because as John Quincy Adams said, "America does not need to go abroad in search of monsters to destroy." Realists argue that interventions by the United States rarely turn out well, citing the cases of Vietnam, Bosnia, Lebanon, Iraq, Somalia, and more.

Having spent much of my working life as an intelligence officer on the street in places like Istanbul, I am astonished at what passes for expertise in the debate over what to do about Iran. It is clear that even the few genuine experts on Iran don't really know what is going on there because they are slaves to their sources of information, which tend to reflect their own philosophical viewpoints and are, in any event, narrowly based. It is conventional wisdom in most of the US media that the Iranian election was stolen, the result of massive fraud. But was it? Opinion polls conducted by a US based organization several weeks before the polling predicted an Ahmadinejad victory. The president is hugely popular among poor rural Iranians and also enjoys overwhelming support for his defense of Iran's right to develop nuclear energy. Elections are very complex affairs and how a talking head sitting in Washington, breathlessly interpreting grainy texting images, can even pretend to understand what is going on in Iran and why defies all logic, particularly if the expert in question speaks no Farsi and probably would have difficulty in locating Isfahan on a map.

CONTINUES and COMMENTS: http://www.campaignforliberty.com/ar...cuss=1#discuss