Ring Of Power-intro 101 to the NWO

[THE eXchanger]

Ring Of Power-intro 101 to the NWO
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=01K7k...eature=related

YouTube - Ring Of Power-intro 101 to the NWO
+ xxx

[orthodoxymoron]

I watched 'Ring of Power' several months ago...but now it is time for me to rewatch it. I don't know if everything is true...but it does connect lots of dots...and the resulting pattern is quite startling and upsetting. I would like to see an absolutely verified and referenced high quality remake of 'Ring of Power'...complete with updates. Keeping us busy and compartmentalized...has kept us ignorant regarding the real big picture. 'And in their ignorance BIND THEM!' The truth will set us free.

[mntruthseeker]

This was fantastic and it did resenate with me.......

There was a site on here called TheTruthBeTold and it was removed that I absolutely loved...............It had so much of this on it and I suppose the reason it was removed.

I kept alot of the stories to re-read and unfortunately my system crashed and all was lost.

I do remember at the time that my phones were bugged, and my tv was viewing me and so on. LOL That is probally all true still, who knows, who cares. It no longer upsets me as I know that my fear only helps their cause. In my mind it does anyhow.....I just stay protected

Anyhow, they mentioned and had official papers indicating alot of what is being said in this video. I have to agree that it rings true to all that I have studied.

It is getting to be pretty widespread information now and I think that is great........the brakes they put on have come off once again, so to speak

Thanks for posting this video

[THE eXchanger]

plus these ones


part 1 of 29

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H2CVAnRByfg&NR=1"]

YouTube - 1. The Ring of Power - Present Past [part 1 of 29]

[THE eXchanger]

part 2 of 29

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SCLes...eature=related

YouTube - 2. The Ring of Power - Only the Start [2 29]
+ xxx

[THE eXchanger]

part 3 of 29

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mIBFX...eature=related

YouTube - 3.The Ring of Power - Profiting from 9 11 [3 29
+ xxx

[THE eXchanger]

part 4 of 29


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a0wzr...993DA&index=19

YouTube - 4. The Ring of Power - Hidden Empire [4 29]

WE ARE LOOKING for this one -- now FOUND

will post later

(must be good-it is missing)

[THE eXchanger]

- part 5 of 29

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yj0cu...eature=related

YouTube - 5. The Ring of Power - Vatican Hoarding

[THE eXchanger]

part 6 of 29

THE ROOT OF AMEN

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8Cm3I...eature=related

YouTube6. The Ring of Power - Amen Pharaohs [6 29]

[THE eXchanger]

PART 7 OF 29

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r7G7p...eature=related

YouTube - 7. The Ring of Power - Forbidden Link [7 29]

[THE eXchanger]

Post Comparison- PART 8 OF 29/30

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O6KNR...eature=related

YouTube - Ring of Power part 8 of 30

[THE eXchanger]

part 9 of 29

www.youtube.com/watch?v=0EfBeLH0IJQ

YouTube - 9. The Ring of Power - The Queen [9 29]
+ xxx

[THE eXchanger]

part 10 of 29

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2mBlD...eature=related

YouTube - 10. The Ring of Power - King of Kings [10 29]

[THE eXchanger]

part 11 of 29

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R3ZBj...eature=related

YouTube - 11. The Ring of Power - The Empire [11 29]

[THE eXchanger]

- part 12 of 29

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q2dY2...eature=related

YouTube - 12. The Ring of Power - The Cult of Amen [12 29]

[THE eXchanger]

- PART 13 OF 29

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9BR1H...eature=related

YouTube - 13. The Ring of Power - The Committee of 300 [13 29

[THE eXchanger]

- part 14 of 29

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q-UL1...eature=related

YouTube - 14. The Ring of Power - Godfathers Rothschild[14 29]

[THE eXchanger]

- part 15 of 29

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pi4fz...eature=related

YouTube - 15. The Ring of Power - New World Order [15 29

[THE eXchanger]

part 16 of 29

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6W5xN...eature=related

YouTube - 16. The Ring of Power - Freemasonry Mafia [16 29]

[THE eXchanger]

part 17 of 29

http://www.projectavalon.net/forum/n...ote=1&p=144848

[THE eXchanger]

part 18 of 29

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B01vD...eature=related

YouTube - 18. The Ring of Power - Credit Monopoly [18 29]

[Seashore]

I did some research on this series for the “The US Constitution” thread.

I emailed the producer of this series, Grace Powers, to ask her some questions.

Here is the exchange:

Grace,

Concerning the Ring of Power set, you talk about there being a separate Constitution for the District of Columbia. What Constitution is that? Can I view it online?

Thank you,
_______________________________________________

Hi Mary,
I suggest you get a copy of the book, The Empire of "The city" (Paperback) by E. C. Knuth.

Grace
_______________________________________________

Hi Grace,

I have received my copy of The Empire of "The City" but there is nothing in it that I can see about a Constitution for the District of Columbia. There is stuff about the United States Constitution only.

Your documentary states that the 3rd city state, the District of Columbia, was officially created in 1982.

I see from my research and I posted on my forum: "...In 1982 elected delegates to a District of Columbia statehood convention drafted a constitution for the proposed State of New Columbia. The petition for statehood was approved by voters within the District and sent to Congress. But in 1993 Congress voted on and rejected District statehood by 63 votes (277 against, 153 for, and four not voting)..." But if Congress rejected statehood, how could this be the Constitution in question?

Also, I'm concerned about the statement in your documentary, "The Treaty of 1783 identifies the King of England as a prince of the United States."

I looked the treaty up on the Library of Congress website and posted the following on my forum: "The link to the treaty on the Library of Congress website shows that the treaty does say, '...It having pleased the Divine Providence to dispose the hearts of the most serene and most potent Prince George the Third, by the Grace of God King of Great Britain...and of the United States of America, to forget...' But of course this is naming the two parties, it is not saying that George the Third was Prince of the United States..."

Here's the link:

http://memory.loc.gov/cgi-bin/ampage...8.db&recNum=93

Can you shed any light?
_______________________________________________

Hi Mary,
Please visit this website in answer to your DC question. DC operates under a tyranical Roman law known as the lex fori.

http://www.lanksamling.se/blogg/eng3kronstater.html

Please visit this website in answer to your Prince George question.

http://www.historyplace.com/unitedst...aty-paris2.htm

The Paris Peace Treaty

In the name of the most holy and undivided Trinity.

It having pleased the Divine Providence to dispose the hearts of the most serene and most potent Prince George the Third, by the grace of God, king of Great Britain, France, and Ireland, defender of the faith, duke of Brunswick and Lunebourg, arch- treasurer and prince elector of the Holy Roman Empire etc., and of the United States of America...

Cheers,
Grace
_______________________________________________

Grace,

It's identifying the two parties that the Divine Providence is pleased to dispose the hearts of to forget all past misunderstandings and differences; that's all. It's not saying prince of the United States:

It having pleased the Divine Providence to dispose the hearts of the most serene and most potent Prince George the Third, by the grace of God, king of Great Britain, France, and Ireland, defender of the faith, duke of Brunswick and Lunebourg, arch- treasurer and prince elector of the Holy Roman Empire etc., and of the United States of America, to forget all past misunderstandings and differences that have unhappily interrupted the good correspondence and friendship which they mutually wish to restore, and to establish such a beneficial and satisfactory intercourse, between the two countries upon the ground of reciprocal advantages and mutual convenience as may promote and secure to both perpetual peace and harmony; and having for this desirable end already laid the foundation of peace and reconciliation by the Provisional Articles signed at Paris on the 30th of November 1782, by the commissioners empowered on each part, which articles were agreed to be inserted in and constitute the Treaty of Peace proposed to be concluded between the Crown of Great Britain and the said United States, but which treaty was not to be concluded until terms of peace should be agreed upon between Great Britain and France and his Britannic Majesty should be ready to conclude such treaty accordingly; and the treaty between Great Britain and France having since been concluded, his Britannic Majesty and the United States of America, in order to carry into full effect the Provisional Articles above mentioned, according to the tenor thereof, have constituted and appointed, that is to say his Britannic Majesty on his part, David Hartley, Esqr., member of the Parliament of Great Britain, and the said United States on their part, John Adams, Esqr., late a commissioner of the United States of America at the court of Versailles, late delegate in Congress from the state of Massachusetts, and chief justice of the said state, and minister plenipotentiary of the said United States to their high mightinesses the States General of the United Netherlands; Benjamin Franklin, Esqr., late delegate in Congress from the state of Pennsylvania, president of the convention of the said state, and minister plenipotentiary from the United States of America at the court of Versailles; John Jay, Esqr., late president of Congress and chief justice of the state of New York, and minister plenipotentiary from the said United States at the court of Madrid; to be plenipotentiaries for the concluding and signing the present definitive treaty; who after having reciprocally communicated their respective full powers have agreed upon and confirmed the following articles.
_______________________________________________

Prince George the Third, by the grace of God, king of Great Britain, France, and Ireland, defender of the faith, duke of Brunswick and Lunebourg, arch- treasurer and prince elector of the Holy Roman Empire etc. AND of the United States of America.

This is perfectly clear.
_______________________________________________

No, it is not.

You have taken the words out of context.

[THE eXchanger]

- do you think you live by the original one ???

[THE eXchanger]

it says:
"that have unhappily interrupted the good correspondence and friendship which they mutually wish to restore"

so, what is it, that they wish to restore ???

this part is quite clear:
Prince George the Third, by the grace of God, king of Great Britain, France, and Ireland, defender of the faith, duke of Brunswick and Lunebourg, arch- treasurer and prince elector of the Holy Roman Empire etc. AND of the United States of America.

where's a good attorney, when you need one ???
+ xxx

[Seashore]

it says: "that have unhappily interrupted the good correspondence and friendship which they mutually wish to restore"

so, what is it, that they wish to restore ???

"the good correspondence and friendship"