|
|
Project Camelot General Discussion Reactions, feedback and suggestions on interviews, current events and experiences. |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
02-10-2009, 11:37 PM | #1 |
Avalon Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: www.altimatrix.com
Posts: 1,525
|
Brian O'Leary's take on Hoagland
I really enjoyed this interview. He is a very brave individual to be on the path he has chosen. I do have one issue with his testimonial. He ambiguously said that the geometry that Richard Hoagland discovered in Cydonia on Mars was false information. That is a very bold claim that in my opinion has no foundation to stand on.
This is the information that he was speaking of. He said that this information was not correct. There it is in black in white, what exactly is not correct about it? |
02-17-2009, 12:37 AM | #2 |
Avalon Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 151
|
Re: Brian O'Leary's take on Hoagland
He sounded unambiguous to me. I was surprised at the statement too. In my memory, what O'leary said was that Hoagland "fudged some of the data" related to Cydonia. I enjoyed "Dark Mission"' and in it, Hoagland made a sound case, imo, using photos and NASA's own inconsistencies to hang them. I would be interested to learn what "fudged" meant. Both men come off as credible to me, which is not true of all the witnesses on Camelot .
|
02-17-2009, 08:34 PM | #3 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Re: Brian O'Leary's take on Hoagland
Interesting tone3jaguar.... however you lost me somewhere at the biggining.....
I need more information to really grasp what the subject is all about. |
02-18-2009, 03:26 PM | #4 | ||
Avalon Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: england
Posts: 254
|
Re: Brian O'Leary's take on Hoagland
Here's the transcript...
http://www.projectcamelot.org/brian_...ipt.html<br /> First the 'fudging' thing....he was refering to Sagan... Quote:
This is what he said about Hoagland... Quote:
Now...I am an admirer of Richard Hoagland. I think he is highly intelligent and isn't afraid to go into deep, deep areas like the Hyperdimensional Model. That man has taught me such a lot.....and I haven't even read the books!! Just the Camelot and Coast 2 Coast stuff. ( + YouTube + Google vids) So I sat up and took notice when O'Leary said that about him. I am always suspiscious when people diss Hoagland... No wonder they had a falling out. I don't know what grounds O'Leary has for claiming that Hoagland's claims....'were certainly not correct' I wonder how he can be so certain.?? Perhaps he's hung up on the 'peer review' scientific method. Even though he has taken a somewhat 'hippy' route in many other ways? Of course, O'Leary came across as a likeable and sincere man...maybe there was an element of 'professional jealousy'....? Don't know... I trust Richard Hoagland's judgement... |
||
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|