Where Are We on 9-11 Truth?

micjer · 12-08-2009, 05:33 PM

http://www.youtube.com/watch?gl=CA&h...YsLnIFEr4&NR=1

Whose is to say it wasn't a combination of many weapons. Kinda creates a double jeopardy situation. There is definately evidence to support both theories. You can see the bombs detonating as the building is collapsing, and molten steel was found weeks later supporting the thermite theory....But there is also a lack of material in the rubble supporting the fact that much of it was dematerialized. Does it have to be one or the other. I for one don't think so.

All I know for sure is that the idea that the two planes caused the buildings to collapse is rediculous and would have happened immediately upon impact, not from jet fuel melting the steel beams. Jet fuel does not burn hot enough to do this, and certainly office furniture is not going to increase the intensity enough to do it either.

12-08-2009, 05:33 PM	#24
micjer Avalon Senior Member Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: Ont. CANADA Posts: 1,043	Re: Where Are We on 9-11 Truth? http://www.youtube.com/watch?gl=CA&h...YsLnIFEr4&NR=1 Whose is to say it wasn't a combination of many weapons. Kinda creates a double jeopardy situation. There is definately evidence to support both theories. You can see the bombs detonating as the building is collapsing, and molten steel was found weeks later supporting the thermite theory....But there is also a lack of material in the rubble supporting the fact that much of it was dematerialized. Does it have to be one or the other. I for one don't think so. All I know for sure is that the idea that the two planes caused the buildings to collapse is rediculous and would have happened immediately upon impact, not from jet fuel melting the steel beams. Jet fuel does not burn hot enough to do this, and certainly office furniture is not going to increase the intensity enough to do it either. Last edited by micjer; 12-08-2009 at 05:44 PM.