Go Back   Old Project Avalon Forum (ARCHIVE) > Project Camelot Forum > Project Camelot > Project Camelot General Discussion

Notices

Project Camelot General Discussion Reactions, feedback and suggestions on interviews, current events and experiences.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-01-2009, 07:26 PM   #1
fossileyesed
Avalon Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: northern bc canada
Posts: 159
Default cosmic anomilies and hexagons

Good day all

I've been checkin out the solar system and have some observations.Now to see if I can get this photo share thing figured out.
Not sure if this works or not.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/34987681@N06/3245025526/ saturn and northern pole

http://www.flickr.com/photos/34987681@N06/?saved=1 the rest are all saturn moons
My observations have to do with hexagons and a thero lack of information on them.By hexagon,I am refering to the "impact craters" all over the solar system,in the shape of hexagons.
I have brought up saturn and its moons,as they are glaring examples and dont need to be pointed out because they are obvious.From large to small they are everywhere.Tethys and mimas are easiest to see[notice the nipple in the centres] because they are so large.
This pattern is through out the solar system.Mercury,mars,our moon,venus,jupiter.
I have a good power of observation,and a fairly active imagination and doubt these things are coincidence.
Opinions please.much appriciated.
peace,love squared to the power of infinity to all.....kent
fossileyesed is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-01-2009, 07:43 PM   #2
Lunaris
Avalon Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 149
Default Re: cosmic anomilies and hexagons

whoa..that is very cool and wacky at the same time..

..here is another link on the saturn's north pole hexagon...

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/17816192/
Lunaris is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-01-2009, 11:01 PM   #3
judykott
Avalon Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Calgary, Canada
Posts: 711
Default Re: cosmic anomilies and hexagons

The internal angles of a regular hexagon (one where all sides and all angles are equal) are all 120° and the hexagon has 720 degrees T. It has 6 rotational symmetries and 6 reflection symmetries, making up the dihedral group D6. The longest diagonals of a regular hexagon, connecting diametrically opposite vertices, are twice its sides in length. Like squares and equilateral triangles, regular hexagons fit together without any gaps to tile the plane (three hexagons meeting at every vertex), and so are useful for constructing tessellations. The cells of a beehive honeycomb are hexagonal for this reason and because the shape makes efficient use of space and building materials. The Voronoi diagram of a regular triangular lattice is the honeycomb tessellation of hexagons.

A persisting hexagonal wave pattern around the Saturn's north polar vortex in the atmosphere at about 78°N was first noted in the Voyager images.[25][26] Unlike the north pole, HST imaging of the south polar region indicates the presence of a jet stream, but no strong polar vortex nor any hexagonal standing wave.[27] However, NASA reported in November 2006 that the Cassini spacecraft observed a 'hurricane-like' storm locked to the south pole that had a clearly defined eyewall.[28] This observation is particularly notable because eyewall clouds had not previously been seen on any planet other than Earth (including a failure to observe an eyewall in the Great Red Spot of Jupiter by the Galileo spacecraft).[29]

The straight sides of the northern polar hexagon are each about 13 800 km long. The entire structure rotates with a period of 10h 39 m 24s, the same period as that of the planet's radio emissions, which is assumed to be equal to the period of rotation of Saturn's interior. The hexagonal feature does not shift in longitude like the other clouds in the visible atmosphere.

The pattern's origin is a matter of much speculation. Most astronomers seem to think some sort of standing-wave pattern in the atmosphere; but the hexagon might be a novel sort of aurora. Polygon shapes have been replicated in spinning buckets of fluid in a laboratory.[30]


Magnetosphere
Saturn has an intrinsic magnetic field that has a simple, symmetric shape—a magnetic dipole. Its strength at the equator—0.2 gau


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Sa...le_feature.jpg

A bizarre six-sided feature encircling the north pole of en:Saturn near 78 degrees north latitude has been spied by the visual and infrared mapping spectrometer on NASA's Cassini spacecraft. This image is one of the first clear images ever taken of the north polar region as seen from a unique polar perspective.

Originally discovered and last observed by a spacecraft during NASA's Voyager flybys of the early 1980's, the new views of this polar en:hexagon taken in late 2006 prove that this is an unusually long-lived feature on Saturn.

This image is the first to capture the entire feature and north polar region in one shot, and is also the first polar view using Saturn's thermal glow at 5 en:microns (seven times the wavelength visible to the en:human eye) as the light source. This allows the pole to be revealed during the nighttime conditions presently underway during north polar winter. Previous images from Voyager and from ground-based en:telescopes suffered from poor viewing perspectives, which placed the feature and the north pole at the extreme northern limb (edge) of the planet.

To see the deep atmosphere at night, the en:infrared instrument images the thermal glow radiating from Saturn's depths. Clouds at depths about 75 kilometers (47 miles) lower than the clouds seen at visible wavelengths block this light, appearing dark in silhouette. To show clouds as features that are bright or white rather than dark, the original image has been contrast reversed to produce the image shown here. The nested set of alternating white and dark hexagons indicates that the hexagonal complex extends deep into the atmosphere, at least down to the 3-Earth-atmosphere pressure level, some 75 kilometers (47 miles) underneath the clouds seen by Voyager. Multiple images acquired over a 12-day period between en:October 30 and en:November 11, en:2006, show that the feature is nearly stationary, and likely is an unusually strong pole-encircling planetary wave that extends deep into the atmosphere.

This image was acquired on en:October 29, 2006, from an average distance of 902,000 kilometers (560,400 miles) above the cloud tops of Saturn.

The Cassini-Huygens mission is a cooperative project of NASA, the en:European Space Agency and the en:Italian Space Agency. The en:Jet Propulsion Laboratory, a division of the en:California Institute of Technology in en:Pasadena, manages the mission for NASA's Science Mission Directorate, Washington, D.C. The Cassini orbiter was designed, developed and assembled at JPL. The Visual and Infrared Mapping Spectrometer team is based at the en:University of Arizona, where this image was produced.

For more information about the Cassini-Huygens mission visit saturn.jpl.nasa.gov. The visual and infrared mapping spectrometer team homepage is at wwwvims.lpl.arizona.edu.

Credit: NASA/JPL/University of Arizona"
judykott is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2009, 12:09 AM   #4
fossileyesed
Avalon Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: northern bc canada
Posts: 159
Default Re: cosmic anomilies and hexagons

Hello Lunaris and Judy
That video is when my imagination first got going.I find it disturbing somehow.
75% hydrogen gas sounds like a very volitile situation and to me it LOOKS like its getting hot.No physics,it just looks hot.

When I look at the pic of hyperion ,I see the bee hive/wax pattern.In the upper centre there is a hexagon tube which clearly is a tube.?
I try to think logically, but my lmagination trumps logic on the whole hex thing I mostly would like to understand all the impact craters as logic does'nt explain the hexagon patterns.
In ancient times the planets and moons had some cool stories about them.A lot of mother,father ,brother,sister stuff.Got some studying to do on that one.
thanx for the input

peace,love squared to the power of infinityto all........kent
fossileyesed is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2009, 12:39 AM   #5
judykott
Avalon Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Calgary, Canada
Posts: 711
Default Re: cosmic anomilies and hexagons

Impact Tectonics

http://www.springerlink.com/content/g42161j05177743k/
Abstract.
The polygonal planimetric shape of impact craters has been known for a long time, but has not been discussed much in the past. Polygonal craters exist on all kinds of celestial bodies that have fractured rigid crusts. They are also found on the Earth (e.g., Meteor Crater, Söderfjärden). Polygonal craters are thought to have been formed by two possible mechanisms. Simple polygonal craters, such as the square-shaped Meteor Crater, result when the excavation flow opens the crater, tearing the target more easily along pre-existing fractures or other planes of weakness. Complex polygonal craters are supposed to have formed during the modification stage, when rocks of the crater rim slump along the fractures in the target. Both mechanisms lead to straight segments of the rim. However, in simple craters the straight rim is typically at some angle, usually about 45°, to the direction of the fractures, whereas in complex craters the rims are thought to be parallel to them. Thus, the regional fracture trends are easier to deduce from complex polygonal craters.
We have studied the distribution and rim orientations of polygonal craters within the geologically versatile greater Hellas region in the southern hemisphere of Mars. Our results (rose diagrams of straight rim segments) indicate the existence and dimensions of radial and concentric fracture patterns around the impact basins of Hellas and Isidis. Such deformation patterns have been observed previously using other indicators of tectonism (grabens, etc.). Other major causes of fracture directions visible in our rose diagrams are the volcanoes in or near the study area. Especially Elysium Mons has created a prominent radial fracture system. Our results correlate well with those obtained by other methods, thus indicating that the use of polygonal craters in finding, studying, and mapping structural properties of a planet’s crust is justified.
judykott is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2009, 12:41 AM   #6
judykott
Avalon Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Calgary, Canada
Posts: 711
Default Re: cosmic anomilies and hexagons

Craters Are Electric another hypothesis for hexagon craters
12/07/2007
By Michael Goodspeed
Suspension of disbelief is a well known mental process whereby a person engaged by a fictional story temporarily surrenders his rational logic. This intensifies a story's emotional impact, particularly when it is too implausible for the intellect to accept. For those engaged in scientific investigation, a similar mental exercise is required in order for one to interpret evidence objectively. Rather than suspend one's logical discernment, one must lay aside all assumptions and biases that might distort or limit one's field of vision. This might be called the suspension of BELIEF(s).

The German philosopher Arthur Schopenhauer once said, "The discovery of truth is prevented more effectively, not by the false appearance things present and which mislead into error, not directly by weakness of the reasoning powers, but by preconceived opinion, by prejudice." The most fundamental "prejudice" that has directed the space sciences for decades is the belief that space is electrically inert. Throughout the Space Age, every new discovery has been interpreted through a lens that views gravity and gravity alone as the force that shapes the heavens.

When the first space probes returned images of the Moon, they revealed a surface heavily pockmarked with craters and riddled with long-sinuous channels (or rilles). Scientists seeking to interpret these features were constrained by the traditional geologic toolkit. The "debate" over the lunar craters only included two possible causative agents: volcanism, or impact. Eventually, a consensus was reached that meteoric impacts were the primary source of lunar craters.

But more than forty years ago, the British journal Spaceflight published the laboratory experiments of Brian J. Ford, an amateur astronomer who raised the possibility that most of the craters on the moon were carved by cosmic electrical discharge. (Spaceflight 7, January, 1965).

In the cited experiments Ford used a spark-machining apparatus to reproduce in miniature some of the most puzzling lunar features, including craters with central peaks, small craters preferentially perched on the high rims of larger craters, and craters strung out in long chains. He also observed that the ratio of large to small craters on the Moon matched the ratio seen in electrical arcing.

Unfortunately (but not surprisingly), no one in the scientific mainstream followed up on Ford's investigation. To consider an electric source to the lunar craters, scientists would have to entertain electrical discharge events more energetic than anything they could envision. The notion of planetary instability and violent electric arcing between planets and moons is totally incompatible with most everything astronomers believe about space physics and celestial mechanics.

Ironically, even as astronomers codified the electrically neutral solar system, the leading pioneers of plasma science were observing stupendous electric forces in space, and documenting the analogs in laboratory discharge phenomena. The father of plasma science, Hannes Alfven, when receiving the Noble prize in physics in 1970, admonished astronomers and cosmologists for ignoring the role of electric currents in the evolution of cosmic bodies.

But when considering planetary history, astronomers are handicapped in two ways: 1) For reasons that are perfectly understandable, they assume that the present serenity and predictable movements of planets and moons can be projected backwards indefinitely. 2) Since most have little or no training in electrodynamics and plasma discharge, their concepts of electricity in space are limited to elementary electrostatics and magnetism, a weakness that has fostered great confusion in the space sciences. They cannot imagine how the inert "vacuum" of space could give rise to the high-energy events investigated in specialized plasma discharge experiments.

For today's electrical theorists, no small adjustment to perception will suffice. A sweeping revision is necessary, one that recognizes the predictable effect when a charged planet or moon moves through an electrified plasma. Where field strength is high, the result will be global electric discharge, as cosmic "thunderbolts" rake across the surface, creating entirely new topography.

Allow this possibility, and the exploration of solar system history is radically altered. Suddenly, plasma discharge and electrical arcing experiments (which have been excluded from planetary science) will be permitted to shed their light on thousands of features left unexplained by traditional theory.

On every solid body in space, we have observed craters lacking any conventional explanation. In fact, on close observation, many craters show distinct features that are not associated with volcanic or impact craters, but are easily created by electric arcs in the laboratory and by electric discharge machining (EDM) used in industrial applications.



Craters in the laboratory



In laboratory experiments using electric arcs, plasma physicist C. J. Ransom produced the craters in the above photo. This cratered surface duplicates many characteristics of planetary geology. The craters tend to clump according to size, and to fall in lines and arcs. Notice also that the ground appears burnt or discolored where the discharge was strongest and the craters the densest -- not unlike the surface of Mars and other rocky bodies in the solar system. The centers of some of the craters have bumps, as do many enigmatic craters on the Moon, Mars, and other surfaces. Also of interest are the dark streaks from two larger craters close to the center of the picture, a pattern similar to the "wind"-streaked craters found on Mars.

The similarity between craters on cosmic bodies and craters in the lab does not prove that the craters seen in space were created by electric arcs. But it is a very good reason to not exclude that possibility. In other words, it is only reasonable to examine cratering patterns more carefully. It is indeed ironic that, as NASA spends billions of tax dollars each year, seeking to unravel the mysteries of planetary surfaces, individuals with no NASA connections (or funds!), have begun to explore electrical explanations.

The shallow craters in Dr. Ransom's experiments above have interesting parallels in cratering experiments undertaken by Zane Parker, using nothing more than dust on an electrified CRT screen. The image below, showing shallow craters with accumulation at the rim and highlighted centers is just one of several promising research directions opened up by his simple experiments.



On hearing of Parker's work, James St. Pe experimented with the dust collector on an ionic breeze air purifier, finding that static discharge produced both sharply defined craters either "randomly" distributed or in linear chains, depending on conditions. (See discussion of crater chains and rilles below).





Hexagonal Craters



It goes without saying that hexagonal cratering patterns are difficult, if not impossible, to explain with the impact hypothesis. And incredibly, many dozens of such formations have been imaged on planetary surfaces. Above, you see just three of the many observed on Mars (a comprehensive collection can be viewed here ). The unique morphology is of special interest, because it links directly to experimental work with plasma discharge in the laboratory. In recent years, plasma scientists have observed hexagonal patterns in a dielectric barrier discharge streamer (see Lifang Dong et al 2004 Plasma Sources Sci. Technol. 13 164-165 doi:10.1088/0963-0252/13/1/021).

The significance of these experiments is underscored by the fact that studies of impacts have never suggested any kinetic force that might generate such a hexagonal pattern.



It must be emphasized that the mystery of hexagonal craters extends well beyond the Martian surface. Above, we see Saturn’s tiny moon Mimas dominated by a giant hexagonal crater, also with the telltale central “bump” typical of so many electric discharge craters.



Also of interest, in electrical terms, is the “bizarre” atmospheric hexagon encircling Saturn’s north pole. In this regard, scientists have connected the hexagon to experiments in which the rotational motion of fluids in a cylinder gives rise to a hexagonal form. Rotational motion is characteristic of an electric discharge as well, but would have no plausible link to the mechanics of impact cratering.



Craters With "Twin Peaks"



The image above -- provided by Michael Gmirkin and NASA's World Wind 3D software -- shows two dominating Martian craters that share "inconceivable" similarities. These supposed "impact" craters are placed side by side, both with central peaks terminating in CRATERS.

Although the 3D visualization exaggerates depth, the impact hypothesis faces apparently insurmountable difficulties. No formative process envisioned by planetary science ever anticipated central peaks of craters terminating in a second crater, as seen above. The craters are found in a region of Mars that planetary scientists believe to be dominated by "impacts." But the impact theory seems totally unable to account for the forms seen here.

Scientists have been able to produce clumpy "rebound" elevations in explosion craters. They also have a theoretical "analogy" in the rebound effect that occurs in thick fluids into which an object is dropped. But they have no reasonable analog for the steep peaks witnessed above, and the idea of two secondary impacts striking these peaks head-on is simply beyond belief. It should be obvious, therefore, that the presence of two craters exhibiting the same anomaly, and standing side-by-side, categorically excludes the impact hypothesis.

Electrical discharge experiments readily produce craters with central peaks. So it is not a stretch to envision a discharge event excavating the kind of craters seen above, including the pinnacles in their centers. More specifically, electrical theorist Wallace Thornhill envisions twin Birkeland filaments rotating "like a corkscrew around a center" to create these "dished" peaks in the same process that formed the crater. He likens the symmetrically shaped "bowl" at the top of the peaks to the levees created by electrical arcs when they move across the surface to carve out channels or rilles.



"Bulls-eye" Craters



The two craters in the above image show all of the features one expects of depressions cut by electric discharge: typical flat floors, steep sides, pinched up rims, and terraces around their walls. But instead of central peaks, they have central CRATERS. Two more craters that are similar lie to the southwest.

Thunderbolts colleague Michael Gmirkin, in pointing out these craters, has labeled them "bull's eye craters," in reference to the middle concentric circles of a dart board, emphasizing the difficulty of hitting the precise center consistently.

Under the impact interpretation, central craters could only be caused by a second impact that coincidentally struck exactly in the center of the previous impact. The impactors that created the craters would have to hit a perfect "bull's eye" to create this effect. It might happen once. Twice in close proximity is extremely unlikely. But four times in the same neighborhood stretches the meaning of "coincidental" beyond the covers of the dictionary!!

If the arcs that machined the large craters persisted until they pinched down into a very small diameter, or if a second return stroke followed the ionized path left by the first and persisted long enough, the central peaks (if they were not already machined away) would have been "drilled down," perhaps even to a depth below the original craters' floors. Such an event would not be the norm, but several "bull's-eye craters" in a particular area would not be surprising. It may be significant that the four examples noted here lie on the plain just south of Valles Marineris -- seen by the electric theorists as the largest EDM channel (from a traveling arc) in the Solar system.



Rampart Craters



"Rampart"¯ craters and "pedestal"¯ craters on Mars are virtually impossible to explain with the impact model. Pedestal craters, including their bottoms, stand ABOVE the elevation of the surrounding terrain. Rampart craters, like the one shown in the above THEMIS image, are surrounded by a "moat" (red arrow) that's deeper than the original ground level and an outer "rampart" (blue arrow) that's higher than both the moat and the surrounding terrain. The outer rampart seems to have "flowed" away from the crater, rather than to have been ejected.

From an Electric Universe point of view, these craters are enormous "fulgamites," raised blisters like those found on the metal caps of lightning arrestors after a lightning strike. Because the whole blister is lifted above the surface by the lightning arc, the crater at the top is not necessarily deeper than the elevation of the original surface around it. The material forming the raised fulgamite is scavenged from the surroundings, leaving a "moat" below the surface level.

The radial flow features have been produced in the laboratory when an arc strikes a moist clay surface. The arc appears to draw water to the surface and then to drive it away from the crater, generating a distinctive flow pattern. Thus, the rampart craters, combined with laboratory experiments, add to the evidence that Mars had water in the past.



Domed Craters





The top images above show large craters on Mars that contain mysterious spherical domes. The bottom images show spheres and craters in Dr. C. J. Ransom's electrical discharge experiments.

Dr. Ransom was compelled to explore a possible electric explanation to the Martian "blueberries" -- tiny, bb-like spherules embedded by the trillions in the Martian surface. He obtained a quantity of hematite -- an iron-rich material that is the primary constituent of the soil surrounding the blueberries -- and blasted it with an electric arc. The embedded spheres created by the arc appear to replicate the features of the blueberries on Mars.

Dr. Ransom's experiments have profound ramifications for our understanding of Mars. In simple appearance, the embedded spheres created by Ransom also look surprisingly similar to the enormous Martian craters and "domes" in the top pictures above. This is significant because of the well-known SCALABILITY of electric discharge -- what occurs on a small scale also occurs on larger scales. In contrast to the rover "blueberry" images, the "domed craters" on Mars range in size from kilometers in diameter down to a hundred meters or less.

At the present time, Ransom's electrical discharge experiments have provided the only fact-based explanation for these anomalous formations. It must be asked, therefore, if the "blueberries" and the domed craters were produced by the same electrical force, acting on widely different scales.

Amazingly, NASA images at the south polar region of Mars have revealed even larger domed craters, as seen here. The area surrounding the ice cap is peppered with craters, many of them several kilometers in diameter, most notably, the formation in the upper left that exhibits a dome-shaped central feature within a crater. It should go without saying that there is no known geologic process producing such features.



Aligned Craters



Above is an image of three aligned craters in the Noachis Terra region on Mars. In interpreting these craters, NASA follows the accepted impact theory: "[T]hree aligned meteor impact craters on the floor of a much larger crater in the Noachis Terra region. The craters may have formed together from a single event in which the impactor (the meteor) was broken into three pieces."

A single event is required because there is no rubble on the floors of the craters from adjacent impacts. The blast force would have had to act simultaneously to displace laterally the ejecta situated between the impacts. But the only imaginable way to get three craters in a single event is to have the impactor break into three pieces. And then the problem returns to the first observation of three ALIGNED craters: It's unlikely that a meteor breaking up under the forces of heat and shock in the atmosphere will produce pieces that travel abreast to the surface. The theory has bitten itself on the ankle and is hobbling around in a circle.

From the Electric Universe perspective, these aligned craters are better explained as electrical discharge scars. An electric arc impinging on a surface will "machine" out a circular hole, much like a router bit. Often, the bottom will be fairly flat; the sides will be steep; the removed material will be lifted away, leaving a clean excavation.



Crater Chains and "Rilles"



The networks of channels or rilles discovered on planetary surfaces constitute one of the great mysteries in planetary science. But they are also a crucial test of the electrical model because the model identifies the force creating most rilles as the same force that caused the dominant cratering patterns.

Look at the above image of Jupiter's moon Ganymede. Try to imagine an impacting body breaking up to form a neatly graded and spaced line of objects that might create this series of overlapping craters. Common sense tells us that the chance of this happening is virtually zero.

But crater chains are an observed effect of electric arcs passing over a cathode (negatively charged) surface, as discussed above (Craters in the Laboratory). With slight variations in the current or in surface composition, the arc may stop jumping from one crater to the next and cut a trench instead.

In other words, within the electric model, there is a full range of connections that must be explored between channels and craters. And yet mainstream science, while spending billions on space exploration, appears to have spent not a penny on exploring the power of electricity to create a wide range of enigmatic features observed in space.

In the picture of the Jovian moon Ganymede above, the craters overlap so closely that the distinction between "crater chain" and "straight rille" blurs. There are sections of this crater chain that could pass for a rille. When examined closely, the image also includes smaller rilles with scalloped sections that could pass for overlapping craters. Notice that the sizes of the craters are similar, with an increase toward the middle. From an Electric Universe point of view, this size gradation is a reflection of the initial increase in current as an arc becomes established, followed by a decrease as the arc quenches. In lightning strikes with multiple strokes, the middle strokes are usually the strongest.

Notice also that many of the craters retain their central peaks -- a common effect in craters created in the lab by electric discharge. The arc that carves a crater is a Birkeland current consisting of a pair of filaments that rotate around the current's axis. If the crater is large enough, the two filaments will not meet in the center, leaving a central spire intact.

Melting is another defining characteristic of electrical erosion. Although extensive melting is ascribed to impacts, impacts in fact produce little melting. The particles of rubble may be immersed in hot gases from the impact, but the heat dissipates too quickly for conduction to carry much of it into the particles. Electrical erosion, on the contrary, generates heat inside the eroded particles, in the manner of a heating element on an electric stove. A general expectation of the Electric Universe is that the floors of craters and rilles will show extensive glassification. Unfortunately, it can only be confirmed by on-site observations.

A final observation is that many craters appear to have their rims "pinched up," rather than "rolled over" or splattered as would be expected from debris thrown out by an impact. Many rilles, too, have "pinched up" dikes along their edges. This emphasizes the indication from missing debris that the erosional forces were directed upward.



To see the relationship between crater formation and rilles, it's useful to observe the more extreme cases in which the standard explanation fails completely. Often, planetary scientists can only guess as to the force generating channels on Mars. Sometimes, they will "see" flowing liquid (water or lava), and other times they will "see" wind erosion, and still other times they will see cracks. In all of these cases, the visible link to craters will pose enigmas. Consider the extraordinary image above of the Martian surface, called Avernus Colles. The network of channels observed from space was certainly not caused by flowing liquid, and on the face of it, it is not surprising that planetary scientists identified the channels as cracks or "fractures." When viewed more closely, however, the "obvious" explanation evaporates. A small section of the region above shows unequivocally the relationship between a cratering process and the enigmatic channels. To appreciate the scope of the mystery, one should view the entire THEMIS image, available here.

Once the inseparable relationship of craters to channels is fully appreciated, planetary scientists will begin to see the essential connection of the same electric force to massive "surface etching"¯ on Mars -- a process that has continued to baffle NASA investigators.



Subterranean Structure Beneath Craters



In examining the credibility of the electrical cratering hypothesis, space exploration will provide increasing opportunities to test the hypothesis against standard theory. In standard theory, a crater is born from a high-velocity impact, when the colliding object penetrates deeply into the soil, then explodes. The one certainty in the impact hypothesis is that the subsurface terrain will be massively disturbed.

In the electric model, however, subsurface material may be pulled upward toward the center of the crater to create a central bump or peak. That is the only disturbance that would be expected. Therefore, it was of great interest to the electrical theorists when Australian researcher Dave Smith noted an image returned to Earth from the Cassini probe of Saturn and its moons. A close-up of Saturn's moon Dione showed a surface exhibiting numerous craters, but also a sharply cut trench bisecting at least two craters. When Cassini captured the bissected craters from an angle, the subsurface layers were clearly exposed. It could be seen that no disturbances of the sort required by the impact hypothesis occurred in the event that gave birth to the crater.

Visible in the image is a layer of light material, and beneath that material, a layer of dark material. No disturbance can be seen in the boundaries between the two layers, though such disturbance would have been massive if in fact an impactor had created the depression.

The evidence cited above includes only several of thousands of craters most reasonably explained by the electric force. Of course, this is also typical of many of Earth's most famous craters: Richat Crater in the Saharan desert, whose uplifted terrain, circularity, concentric terraces, and layered sedimentary rock defy both the impact and volcanic theories of cratering; Aorounga Crater also in the Sahara, whose parallel grooves and intersecting ridges (which run through the surrounding landscape as well as the crater itself) have been described as "implausible" by geologists; Meteor Crater in Arizona, a 4,000 foot wide depression now regarded by science as an "impact" crater despite the UNDISTURBED rock beds below the crater; and Chicxulub Crater, the famous alleged site of the "asteroid" impact thought to have killed off the dinosaurs. Chicxulub is up to 300 km across, with multiple concentric rings, and the added mystery of Upper Cretaceous fossils found in UNDISTURBED layers -- fossils of the creatures that the impact was supposed to have wiped out.

Craters on bodies in space tell us a story that can revise our understanding of the Universe and our place in it. But this story cannot be seen or understood when vision is distorted by prejudice and assumption. If scientists can suspend these distorting assumptions, the story will become both obvious and revolutionary. The planets and moons in our Solar System are the war-torn remnants of a violent age. The force that battered them is the same force that gives exquisite structure to nebulae and galaxies, powers the Sun, and causes the spectacular displays of comets. That force is electricity.
judykott is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2009, 01:40 AM   #7
fossileyesed
Avalon Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: northern bc canada
Posts: 159
Default Re: cosmic anomilies and hexagons

Thanx Judy
Im gonna run with the electic/plasma for now as it does seem most promising.
Thanx again

peace,love squared to the power of infinity to all........kent
fossileyesed is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2009, 01:48 AM   #8
777 The Great Work
Avalon Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: At the doors of perception
Posts: 2,135
Default Re: cosmic anomilies and hexagons

Wake up everybody

Its conditioning for the mark. The hex makes the x

Jags - Back Of My Hand Lyrics

Send “Back Of My Hand” Ringtone to Your Cell

YOU ONLY CALL ME IF YOUR FEELING BLUE
YOU TELL ME I DON'T PAY ATTENTION TO YOU
BUT IF YOU ONLY KNEW, JUST WHAT I'M GOING THROUGH
YOU WOULDN'T PHONE THOSE GUYS WHO MESS AROUND WITH YOU GIRL
WHEN I CALL YOU I GET STACK OF LIES
YOU WHIP 'EM OUT BEFORE YOU DRY YOUR EYES
I'M NOT A FRUIT MACHINE A NINETEEN SIXTIES DREAM
AND IN THE 'BET YOU' LIST I BET YOU'VE NEVER SEEN HER

PRE CHORUS
YOUR NOT UNREADABLE,YOUR NOT UNBEATABLE,
I KNOW JUST WHAT YOU ARE, DON'T PUSH YOUR LUCK TOO FAR
YOUR NOT UNTOUCHABLE, NOT JUST ANOTHER GIRL
I'D GET IN TOUCH WITH YOU , I ONLY WISH YOU KNEW THAT

CHORUS
I'VE GOT YOUR NUMBER WRITTEN ON THE BACK OF MY HAND X 3
I'VE GOT YOUR NUMBER

I HAD A DREAM I MET ANOTHER GIRL
BUT IN THE MORNING SHE WAS JUST A KICK INSIDE,
I HOPE I'M GETTIN' THROUGH THE INTERFERENCE TOO
MY MONEY'S RUNNING OUT I DON'T KNOW WHAT TO SAY NOW
THE OPERATOR'S SAYING CUT THE LINE
YOU WANT TO CALL HERE FOR THE VERY LAST TIME,
YOU'RE ONLY YOUNG AT HEART, BUT THERE'S A TIME TO START
JUST REALIZING WHAT I'VE GOT DOWN HERE GIRL!

PRE CHORUS
YOU'RE NOT UNREACHABLE ....ETC

CHORUS

GUITAR SOLO

SAY DON'T YOU REALIZE
IS THERE NOTHING LEFT INSIDE
HEY DID I GET YOU WRONG
SAY WHERE'S YOUR NUMBER GONE
777 The Great Work is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-27-2009, 10:52 PM   #9
fossileyesed
Avalon Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: northern bc canada
Posts: 159
Default Re: cosmic anomilies and hexagons

this is a snow flake micrographed
trippy
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedi...M%2C_13368.jpg

peace,love .......kent
fossileyesed is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-28-2009, 12:28 AM   #10
Dantheman62
Avalon Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: So. Cal. U.S.
Posts: 4,205
Default Re: cosmic anomilies and hexagons

Here's a cool site with lots of pictures, and you can click on other links to see other anomalies... http://www.cosmicastronomy.com/hexagram.htm#moon
Dantheman62 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-28-2009, 12:45 AM   #11
Dantheman62
Avalon Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: So. Cal. U.S.
Posts: 4,205
Default Re: cosmic anomilies and hexagons


NASA / JPL / Univ. of Ariz.
Saturn's northern aurora glows bluish-green in this color-coded infrared image.
The planet's polar cloud patterns are shown in shades of red. Scientists say
that the areas of auroral activity close to the pole shouldn't be there.






The image on the right is the South Pole of Saturn (spookily resembling an eye) is a 5000 mile wide hurricane raging within the atmosphere. The estimated wind speed of the monster storm is 350 mph, with the pole locked at the centre. Jupiter's famed visible red spot is also a hurricane type storm - but it differs from the one on Saturn as it has no "eye". The eye on Saturn has allowed astronomers a glimpse into the lower layers of the atmosphere, but only to see a mysterious set of dark clouds at the bottom of the eye.


Mars
The picture below shows the retreating polar ice cap on Mars - in the central and right image, a hexagon is visible.


Jupiter

A geometric shape, noted by NASA to be a "quasi-hexagon" has been photographed in Jupiter's northern hemisphere.

The hexagons remain the focus of continued scientific investigation, however, resolution may be a long time coming as they open up huge and complex questions about the entire universe and everything in it, from the smallest sub-atomic particle to the largest body of mass.
Dantheman62 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-28-2009, 12:55 AM   #12
fossileyesed
Avalon Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: northern bc canada
Posts: 159
Default Re: cosmic anomilies and hexagons

thanx dantheman
checkin it out now
fossileyesed is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 02:18 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Project Avalon