|
|
Project Avalon General Discussion Finding safe places, information and resources for building communities, site suggestions. |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
08-01-2009, 10:16 PM | #1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
CERN: ATLAS, CIA, Stony Brook/ Brookhaven Nat. Lab
What's going on? Here's info about inter-relations at CERN's LHC (large hadron collider), as well as the new schedule.
The Atlas Heavy Ion Program was developed at Stony Brook University and Brookhaven National Lab (Office of Science, Dept. of Energy). http://www.hep.upenn.edu/ichep08/tal...es?Talk_id=299 pdf 34pp Schedule - The Atlas Experiment - Mapping the Secrets of the Universe On 9 February 2009, CERN announced a new schedule for the LHC that envisions collisions in late October 2009 with an almost continuous run until autumn 2010 (see CERN press releases One and Two). http://atlas.ch/news/2009/preparing-for-collisions.html UFO's and Brookhaven - UFOs and the CIA - Anatomy of a Cover-Up Besides the esteemed Dr. Robertson, the Panel also included as members physicist Dr. Luis Alvarez, later a Nobel Laureate, Dr. Samuel Goudsmit, another physicist from Brookhaven National Laboratories who was an associate of Einstein's and had discovered electron spin, a former University of Chicago astronomer and then deputy director of the Johns Hopkins Operations Research office, Dr. Thornton Page, and finally Dr. Lloyd Berkner, yet another physicist and one of Brookhaven's directors. http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/ci...ventions30.htm Collaboration - Approximately 1,700 scientists, students and technicians from 94 US institutions participate in the LHC. These institutions include universities and national laboratories from 31 states and Puerto Rico. http://www.uslhc.us/The_US_and_the_L...g_Institutions ................................................. Main Street - CERN LHC will probably kill us but what the hell lets see what happens! http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=12756938915 The Daily Show - April 30, 2009: Large Hadron Collider http://www.thedailyshow.com/watch/th...adron-collider |
08-02-2009, 08:31 PM | #2 |
Avalon Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: england
Posts: 1,153
|
Re: CERN: ATLAS, CIA, Stony Brook/ Brookhaven Nat. Lab
what is CERN really for. surely the people working there know that there are no such things as higgs bosons ect.. gravitons lol.. maybe they are that blinded.. who knows?? most of them know string theory IS bs ...WHATSthe real reason for it!!!!!! looks and sounds like a hyperspace time space gateway device.
|
08-04-2009, 08:03 AM | #3 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Re: CERN: ATLAS, CIA, Stony Brook/ Brookhaven Nat. Lab
First, there's the court case last year. Some physicists objected to CERN's risk assessments for the LHC 'Big Bang Machine.' They lost the case.
Jeez. Can you imagine a judge hearing that case? All the debate about which theoretical nuclear particles will do what. Risk assessments are always about worse case scenarios. CERN said it was fine: the Hawking radiation would take care of everything (i.e. little black holes). No problem! Suit Alleges CERN in Violation of Human Rights Wednesday, August 27, 2008 http://bigsciencenews.blogspot.com/2...-of-human.html Yesterday, a group of LHC critics filed a suit against CERN in the European Court of Human Rights, in Strasbourg . The authors of the suit are physicists, professors and students largely from Germany and Austria, who feel that the operation of the $10 billion Large Hadron Collider near Geneva, poses grave risks for the safety and well-being of the 27 member states of the European Union and their citizens. The Rule of Law, the suit states, is also threatened. The legal arguments that define the legitimacy of the suit appear clear-cut, and have been crafted in German by a well known Professor of International Law, Adrian Hollaender. The arguments for several major risks that might develop into wholesale disasters are based on papers from various physicists and a risk assessment analyst, whose conclusions will be examined by the court as well as counter-arguments by CERN. It's a question of theories versus theories. The outcome is anyone's guess, but a cogent risk analysis could be the deciding factor. The suit highlights the possible production of Micro Black Holes, which could be a pollution hazard or combine and destroy the LHC. In the worst case, mBH could start consuming the planet, producing dangerous radiation. MBH are admitted as theoretically possible by CERN. Indeed CERN anticipated large scale production of mBH, but lately has refuted the possibility and denied that they could be produced at the LHC, unless there were extra dimensions as postulated in String Theory. In that case CERN says mBH would be harmless, evaporating quickly due to a theoretical Hawking radiation, though this radiation has not been detected from black holes in space. Bosenovas are a new risk theory in the suit, besides the better known Strangelets and Lowered Vacuum State theories. Unlike the others there is some experimental evidence for a Bosenova, but this phenomenon of implosion/explosion has only been produced in small groups of atoms of Rubidium-85 in an ultracold state, a Bose-Einstein Condensate. What might occur at the LHC, is a new type of Bosenova from what amounts to a BEC used there as a coolant, an ultracold Superfluid Helium II, of about 60 metric tonnes in the LHC ring, and a further 60 tonnes of somewhat warmer Superfluid Helium I in refrigeration plants on the surface connected to the subterranean main ring. Whether possible or not is unknown, no experiments having been done by CERN to rule out the possibility, nor any theoretical model studies. The Bosenova risk was first raised in an article by Alan Gillis in the on-line science magazine, ScientificBlogging, July 2, 2008, "Superfluids, BECs and Bosenovas: The Ultimate Experiment". The first full proton beam injection into the LHC is due September 10th. As further studies and experiments required to assess risks are a long way off, and even a decision on risks as presented by the plaintiffs could take the European Court some time to evaluate, the authors of the suit are asking the court for a speedy granting of Interim Measures. The LHC should be shut-down pending the Court's ruling. The argument that the LHC be limited to no more than 2 TeV energy overall, similar to Fermilab's Tevatron collider design energies, they exclude from the Court's consideration. A similar suit is before the US court in Hawaii, launched by Dr Walter Wagner and Dr Luis Sancho, against CERN and Fermilab, court in session September 2nd. ---------------------------------------------- And here's the FERMI team. Nothing to worry about. Meanwhile, it seems, physicists at the Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory in Batavia, Ill., have been tinkering with their Tevatron. http://news.cnet.com/8301-17852_3-10173538-71.html |
08-04-2009, 09:25 AM | #4 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Re: CERN: ATLAS, CIA, Stony Brook/ Brookhaven Nat. Lab
BACK IN TIME - ROCKETRY/ JET PROPULSION
1919: And there was another factor, too, which - though designed to put a brake on the Germans' rearmament and to slow down their capacity to develop new weapons - actually had the effect of greatly intensifying development. This was the Treaty of Versailles which forbade the production of large ships, of high-capacity aircraft, of large-calibre weapons; but the Ger mans quickly overcame these limitations as far as they could by devoting new energies to making effective weapons within these limits. Thus one had convertible firearms, which could quickly be adapted for military use; one had high-velocity guns; one saw the pocket-battleship arise and the perfection of aircraft and gliders - all factors which, between them, enabled the Nazis quietly to evade many of the apparently inevitable restrictions of the Treaty of Versailles. 1930s: Even in this field the Germans were working secretly on a number of projects which were later to surprise the Western world at large; jet-propulsion was at this stage very much more highly developed than the Allies knew, and rocket-powered aircraft were already on the drawing board. The most terrible of all of the German secret weapons were the rockets, of course - and these were beginning to be developed too, behind closed doors; as early as 1931 the first of the modern liquid fuelled rockets took to the air and reached a height of perhaps 1,000 feet from a base in Dessau and within two years secret teams were investigating the possibilities of manned rocket flight. The quickest way of reaching the enemy is through the air, and it is only natural that it was the Luftwaffe research establishments that were amongst the most progressive in forging these new, surprising weapons of war. 1945: President Truman authorized Operation Paperclip in August 1945; however he had expressly ordered that anyone found "to have been a member of the Nazi party and more than a nominal participant in its activities, or an active supporter of Nazism militarism" would be excluded. Under this criterion many of the scientists recruited, such as Wernher von Braun , Arthur Rudolph and Hubertus Strughold , who were all officially on record as Nazis and listed as a "menace to the security of the Allied Forces," were ineligible. All were cleared to work in the U.S. after having their backgrounds "bleached" by the military. The paperclips that secured newly-minted background details to their personnel files gave the operation its name. http://naziscienceliveson.devhub.com/ 1945: What the intelligence community knew, and most people did not, was that in the final frantic hours of World War II, the Soviet army had hastily raided Germany's most advanced weapons research laboratories. And, on Aug. 29, 1949, only four years after Hiroshima, the technological booty from those raids turned a country whose farmers still used horse-drawn plows into a nuclear superpower. http://greyfalcon.us/restored/myPict...ar%20sucer.htm .................................................. ... "Popular Mechanics" America's Nuclear Flying Saucer: NOVEMBER 2000 |
08-04-2009, 09:40 AM | #5 |
Avalon Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: england
Posts: 1,153
|
Re: CERN: ATLAS, CIA, Stony Brook/ Brookhaven Nat. Lab
i dont buy the current black hole theory. so im not scared about them making what they think are black holes. undoubtedley they are playing with fire at such high energies, but they are lost in a material universe of particle physics and non understanding of what gravity is or how it works..
the ptb have a big hand in this machine i feel. something doestn sit right with me.. is it far enough underground to aboid the CME when it hits? lets hope it doenst escape the frying .this machine is dnagerous but not for the reasons we are told in public i think. |
08-04-2009, 09:45 AM | #6 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Re: CERN: ATLAS, CIA, Stony Brook/ Brookhaven Nat. Lab
Manhattan Project (1942-46)
Because code names were meant to conceal the exact purpose of and details behind a project, it is widely believed that this is true of the Manhattan Project's name. However, the project was in fact named for where many of its early operations were conducted. According to historian Robert Norris, Manhattan contained at least ten sites where the project's work was being conducted--the island was ideal because of its port facilities, the military presence, a large available work force, and a population of expatriate European physicists--and Columbia University, a center of early nuclear research. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manhattan_Project |
08-04-2009, 09:50 AM | #7 |
Avalon Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: england
Posts: 1,153
|
Re: CERN: ATLAS, CIA, Stony Brook/ Brookhaven Nat. Lab
oppenheimer quotes: “ If the radiance of a thousand suns were to burst at once into the sky, that would be like the splendor of the mighty one " “ We knew the world would not be the same. A few people laughed, a few people cried. Most people were silent. I remembered the line from the Hindu scripture, the Bhagavad-Gita; Vishnu is trying to persuade the Prince that he should do his duty, and to impress him, takes on his multi-armed form and says, 'Now I am become Death, the destroyer of worlds.' I suppose we all thought that, one way or another. Last edited by pineal-pilot-in merkabah; 08-04-2009 at 09:57 AM. |
08-04-2009, 10:07 AM | #8 | |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Re: CERN: ATLAS, CIA, Stony Brook/ Brookhaven Nat. Lab
Quote:
Einstein was right? I think they want to settle it. The mBH (micro black hole) risks, if I read it right, lie in String Theory. {I'm still guessing at the real reason too. But there are lots of surface science questions the LHC expects to answer. My guess tonight: they do want anti-matter in a jar, to pop into craft like a fuel cartridge.} |
|
08-04-2009, 10:26 AM | #9 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Re: CERN: ATLAS, CIA, Stony Brook/ Brookhaven Nat. Lab
The funny thing about the Manhattan Project (not that anything is actually funny), is our chemtrail friend, Edward Teller. He was the only guy that continued to advocate for bombs. He was tied up with Lawrence Livermore National Lab, which I see now in Wikipedia he co-founded.
He also wrote this: Sunscreen for Planet Earth By Edward Teller Global warming is too serious to be left to the politicians. Hoover fellow Edward Teller suggests a scientific solution to the problem. Injecting sunlight-scattering particles into the stratosphere appears to be a promising approach. Why not do that? http://www.hoover.org/publications/digest/3522851.html |
08-04-2009, 02:37 PM | #10 |
Avalon Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Light
Posts: 239
|
Re: CERN: ATLAS, CIA, Stony Brook/ Brookhaven Nat. Lab
The internet (www to be more exact) was born in CERN.. what more needs to be said? CERN is a lot more than a nuclear research facility..
|
08-04-2009, 07:03 PM | #11 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Re: CERN: ATLAS, CIA, Stony Brook/ Brookhaven Nat. Lab
NUCLEAR PROPULSION - SUBMARINES
Powered by nuclear reactors (not diesel engine) - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_submarine The performance advantages of nuclear submarines over "conventional" (typically diesel-electric) submarines are considerable: nuclear propulsion, being completely independent of air, frees the submarine from the need to surface frequently, as is necessary for conventional submarines; the large amount of power generated by a nuclear reactor allows nuclear submarines to operate at high speed for long durations; and the long interval between refuellings grants a range limited only by consumables such as food. Current generations of nuclear submarines never need to be refueled throughout their 25-year lifespans. 1954 - USS Nautilis, first nuclear submarine (Westinghouse) Construction of the Nautilus was made possible by the successful development of a nuclear propulsion plant by a group of scientists and engineers at the Naval Reactors Branch of the Atomic Energy Commission. 1958 - USSR launches its first nuclear sub From the late 1950s through the end of 1997, the Soviet Union, and later Russia, built a total of 245 nuclear submarines, more than all other nations combined. [B]July 26, 2009[B/] - India launches first indigenously built ballistic missile nuclear powered submarine http://www.voanews.com/english/2009-07-26-voa13.cfm ....................................... The nuclear triad - Attack submarines Cruise Missile submarines Ballistic missile submarines - designed for stealth, invisibility (slang-US boomers; UK bombers) SSBN is the United States Navy's hull classification symbol for a nuclear-powered, ballistic nuclear missile-carrying submarine.[1] The SS denotes a "submersible ship", the B denotes "ballistic missile," and the N denotes "nuclear powered." Many navies use two crews per boat to maximize patrol time. The U.S. Navy calls them 'blue' and 'gold' crews; the Royal Navy calls them 'port' and 'starboard' crews; and the French Navy uses 'blue' and 'red' designations. .......................................... Today, six countries deploy some form of nuclear-powered strategic submarines: the United States, Russia, France, the United Kingdom, People's Republic of China, and India. Several other countries, including Argentina and Brazil, have ongoing projects in different phases to build nuclear-powered submarines. In the United Kingdom, all former and current nuclear submarines for the Royal Navy have been constructed in Barrow-in-Furness (at BAE Systems Submarine Solutions or its predecessor VSEL). .................................. COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS FOR SUBS Low frequency transmission to penetrate water depths. Here's an article on Rense. The HAARP system is a high powered PWM transmitter and phased array antenna system. It is about experiments on the upper layers of the ionosphere. Some of the experiments look into its use as a deep penetration communications system for nuclear subs, some of the experiments look into changing the ion density and reaction rates of pollutants in the upper atmosphere, and some is aimed at understanding conduction effects in the ion layers. http://www.rense.com/general45/reee.htm The main challenge in radio communications systems was to develop over-the-horizon transmission capabilities, which bouncing signals off the ionosphere accomplishes. ----------------------------------------- COMMERCIAL NUCLEAR-POWERED VESSELS Air pollution from commercial shipping kills 60,000 people per year. Converting all commercial ships to run on nuclear power would be economic even without considering carbon taxes or fees. In 2000, there were 6800 container ships in the world. At the cold war peak the Soviets had or had almost built about 400 nuclear powered ships and the USA had over 200. http://nextbigfuture.com/2009/07/com...world-oil.html Last edited by no caste; 08-06-2009 at 10:19 PM. Reason: Added info re commercial shipping |
08-05-2009, 06:39 AM | #12 |
Avalon Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: South of the equator.
Posts: 13
|
Re: CERN: ATLAS, CIA, Stony Brook/ Brookhaven Nat. Lab
Found this very interesting article - thinking intervention?? especially as "[m]any of the magnets meant to whiz high-energy subatomic particles around a 17-mile underground racetrack have mysteriously lost their ability to operate at high energies".
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/08/04/sc...e.html?_r=1&em |
08-05-2009, 07:28 AM | #13 | |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Re: CERN: ATLAS, CIA, Stony Brook/ Brookhaven Nat. Lab
Quote:
By DENNIS OVERBYE - Published: August 3, 2009 http://www.democraticunderground.com...ress=228x54788 The biggest, most expensive physics machine in the world is riddled with thousands of bad electrical connections. Many of the magnets meant to whiz high-energy subatomic particles around a 17-mile underground racetrack have mysteriously lost their ability to operate at high energies. Some physicists are deserting the European project, at least temporarily, to work at a smaller, rival machine across the ocean. After 15 years and $9 billion, and a showy “switch-on” ceremony last September, the Large Hadron Collider, the giant particle accelerator outside Geneva, has to yet collide any particles at all. Last edited by no caste; 08-06-2009 at 09:35 PM. |
|
08-05-2009, 08:05 AM | #14 | |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Re: CERN: ATLAS, CIA, Stony Brook/ Brookhaven Nat. Lab
Quote:
1962: "In the Beginning, ARPA created the ARPANET." Includes RAND Corporation, MIT, UCLA... http://www.computerhistory.org/internet_history/ 1989: The first proposal for the World Wide Web (WWW) was made at CERN by Tim Berners-Lee in 1989, and further refined by him and Robert Cailliau in 1990. .................................... CERN = Conseil Européen pour la Recherche Nucléaire European Organization for Nuclear Research 1954: At the end of the Second World War, European science was no longer the crčme de la crčme. Following the example of the now mushrooming international organizations, a handful of visionary scientists imagined creating a European atomic physics laboratory. Raoul Dautry, Pierre Auger and Lew Kowarski in France, Edoardo Amaldi in Italy and Niels Bohr in Denmark were among these pioneers. Such a laboratory would not only unite European scientists but also allow them to share the increasing costs of nuclear physics facilities. http://public.web.cern.ch/public/en/...tory54-en.html If you have ideas about CERN as "a lot more than a nuclear research facility," besides the world wide web and particle physics research, please do elaborate! Thanks for nudging me to clarify this. |
|
08-05-2009, 01:33 PM | #15 |
Avalon Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Light
Posts: 239
|
Re: CERN: ATLAS, CIA, Stony Brook/ Brookhaven Nat. Lab
no caste: Yes , we do need to thank them. Without the internet who knows how far the NWO would have progressed. The internet remains are true last line of defense, as knowledge is the only thing with which we can fight against them at this time.
I have a lot of ideas about CERN but they are highly speculative (some of it based on my astral experience with it) and not based on 'facts' (I believe it is one of the, if not THE most advanced black project research centers). Its very location is in a very secure position (If Switzerland or France fall.. the world must have falen before). The main thing that is currently of great personal interest to me is the hyperdimensional AI which I believe is somehow connected to CERN (already shared that in my thread about that). They even have some official information about some of the AI systems being used there: http://folk.uio.no/perthi/alice/doc/.../aiinalice.pdf Alice? How deep does the rabit hole indeed go in there? Last edited by TheChosen; 08-05-2009 at 01:39 PM. |
08-06-2009, 10:04 PM | #16 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Re: CERN: ATLAS, CIA, Stony Brook/ Brookhaven Nat. Lab
The Chosen: I think OWO did progress with the internet, e.g. surveillance, intercepting broadcast transmissions (e.g. perhaps 9/11), AI alone. It's a double-edged sword IMO. And there are the landfills in China, Ghana... heavy metal poisoning... electronics recycling/ merchandising isn't exactly what it could be, when it comes to its hardware.
I'm not sure about AI projects at CERN. It does seem to be a logical conclusion I guess with its history. There is a mind control connection too, with the Paper Clip boys. This topic gets really big, with the army, ritual sexual abuse, Manchurian candidates, i.e. creating the new army (MK-Ultra, Project Monarch). There are postings about this on Avalon. It's a topic on its own. THE GREENBAUM SPEECH ... Hypnosis in MPD: Ritual Abuse Here's where it appears to have come from. At the end of World War II, before it even ended, Allen Dulles and people from our Intelligence Community were already in Switzerland making contact to get out Nazi scientists. As World War II ends, they not only get out rocket scientists, but they also get out some Nazi doctors who have been doing mind-control research in the camps. http://www.projectavalon.net/forum/s...sexual+rituals Satanic Subversion of the U.S. Military http://www.projectavalon.net/forum/s...sexual+rituals There also seems to be a direct line from these early events to 9/11 in carrying out the Masonica (see quote below). The Greenbaum Speech explains MasonKabbalah human break/programming techniques, where experience, and consciousness, are manipulated to achieve specified behavioral results. Check this opinion - Albert Pike, the Head of the Scottish Rite in the 19th Century, continued: "The [third] war must be conducted in such a way that Islam (the Moslem Arabic World) and political Zionism (the State of Israel) mutually destroy each other." The B'nai B'rith is part of the Masonic Scottish Rite Order established in 1843. It's militant arm, the "Anti Defamation League" (ADL) was formed in 1913, the same year as the US Federal Reserve. http://www.savethemales.ca/001211.html |
08-09-2009, 03:02 PM | #17 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Re: CERN: ATLAS, CIA, Stony Brook/ Brookhaven Nat. Lab
Update -
$10 billion collider to be started up at half-power; costly repairs to continue 12:00 AM CDT on Saturday, August 8, 2009 http://www.dallasnews.com/sharedcont...1.4bfe29e.html GENEVA – When launched to great fanfare nearly a year ago, some feared the Large Hadron Collider would create a black hole that would suck in the world. It turns out the Hadron may be the black hole. The Large Hadron Collider near Geneva was completed in 2008 but has worked for only nine days and has not yet smashed any atoms. The world's largest scientific machine has cost $10 billion, has worked only nine days and has yet to smash an atom. The unique equipment in a 17-mile circular tunnel with cathedral-size detectors deep beneath the Swiss-French border has been assembled by specialists in many countries, with 8,970 physicists eagerly awaiting the start-up... ------------------------------------ NUCLEAR-POWERED BORING MACHINES "DIGGERS" The September, 1983 Omni ran a picture story on the "Subterrene," a nuclear tunnel-boring machine developed at Los Alamos. The machine burrows through deep underground rock, heating it to a molten state (magma), which cools after the Subterrene moves on. The result is a tube with a smooth, glazed lining that can be used for the high-speed transport shuttles that link the sub-base complexes. http://www.subversiveelement.com/Dulce.html |
08-23-2009, 03:03 AM | #18 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Re: CERN: ATLAS, CIA, Stony Brook/ Brookhaven Nat. Lab
Here's a good one from CERN (I hope 'Thunderbolts of the Gods' people submit an edited version in the third category.)
CinéGlobe 2010 international short film festival invites films for three competitions Geneva, 19 August. The next edition of the CinéGlobe International Short Film Festival will take place the 16-20th of February 2010 at CERN1 near Geneva, Switzerland. Filmmakers are invited to submit their work to one of three competitions: * General fiction up to ten minutes (deadline for submissions: 14th September 2009) * Science-fiction or scientific fiction up to twenty minutes (deadline for submissions: 30th September 2009) * Science documentary up to thirty minutes (deadline for submissions: 30th September 2009) http://press.web.cern.ch/press/Press.../PR14.09E.html Exploring the Electric Universe “Today, nothing is more important to the future and credibility of science than liberation from the gravity-driven universe of prior theory. A mistaken supposition has not only prevented intelligent and sincere investigators from seeing what would otherwise be obvious, it has bred indifference to possibilities that could have inspired the sciences for decades.” http://www.thunderbolts.info/home.htm |
08-23-2009, 03:13 AM | #19 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Re: CERN: ATLAS, CIA, Stony Brook/ Brookhaven Nat. Lab
The amended schedule - uh, November 2009, I guess. Also, results of the recent problem.
---------------------- CERN's Large Hadron Collider will initially run at an energy of 3.5 TeV per beam when it starts up in November this year. The latest tests looked at the resistance of the copper stabilizer. Many copper connections showing anomalously high resistance have been repaired already, and the tests on the final two sectors, which concluded last week, have revealed no more outliers. This means that no more repairs are necessary for safe running this year and next. http://press.web.cern.ch/press/Press.../PR13.09E.html |
09-11-2009, 06:12 PM | #20 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Re: CERN: ATLAS, CIA, Stony Brook/ Brookhaven Nat. Lab
This video also discusses a lot of the technicalities of particle physics - the bits and pieces
|
09-11-2009, 07:02 PM | #21 | |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Re: CERN: ATLAS, CIA, Stony Brook/ Brookhaven Nat. Lab
Quote:
The poem Jerusalem (1804), by William Blake, is actually an excerpt from the preface to one of his "prophetic books", Milton. Jerusalem is here the symbolic residence of a humanity freed of the inter-related chains of commerce, British imperialism, and war. Blake's "mental fight" is directed against these chains. In his Blake: Prophet Against Empire, David Erdman tells us that Blake's "dark, Satanic Mills" are "mills that produce dark metal, iron and steel, for diabolic purposes . . . . London . . . was a war arsenal and the hub of the machinery of war, and Blake uses the symbol in that sense." Jerusalem was set to music quite movingly by composer Hubert Parry in 1916, and has since seen many variations, ranging from the magisterial to the rousing. Our favorite is the version arranged by Emerson, Lake and Palmer [1973]. A link may be visited here for a performance on the organ. http://www.progressiveliving.org/wil..._jerusalem.htm And back to the Crusades. From The History of the Knights Templar (1842) - 'Addison details the rise of the [Knights] Templars to become, essentially, the first multinational corporation. The Templars were entrusted by the Church and States of Europe to be the spearhead of the crusades. Jerusalem was won and lost several times by the crusaders in the 12th and 13th centuries... The Temple Church eventually became the centre of the legal profession in the City of London. http://www.scribd.com/doc/3917620/Th...nights-Templar Last edited by no caste; 09-16-2009 at 06:05 AM. |
|
09-26-2009, 10:11 AM | #22 |
Avalon Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 2,375
|
Re: CERN: ATLAS, CIA, Stony Brook/ Brookhaven Nat. Lab
From Dan Winter's site:
'The inconceivable stupidity of modern physics: The intelligence it takes to figure out that Golden Ratio is the electrical cause of constructive wave interference, is right up there with the smarts it takes to determine the best shape to use to make a wheel is a circle. And yet-because modern physics has not yet figured this out- is specifically why they have not discovered the electrical cause of gravity or life force or consciousness! Constructive wave interference (compression) is the cause of gravity - and the cause of life, and consciousness.. So of course they do not understand why golden ratio fractal symmetry is the only way to stabilize gravity, and life force, and bliss... nor even the right (fractal) shape to build a container (architecture) to cause life!' http://www.goldenmean.info/ |
10-05-2009, 04:07 AM | #23 | |
Avalon Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 2,375
|
Re: CERN: ATLAS, CIA, Stony Brook/ Brookhaven Nat. Lab
Quote:
LHC to run at 3.5 TeV for early part of 2009-2010 run rising later 06.08.2009 'The LHC will run at 3.5 TeV per beam until a significant data sample has been collected and the operations team has gained experience in running the machine. Thereafter, with the benefit of that experience, the energy will be taken towards 5 TeV per beam. At the end of 2010, the LHC will be run with lead ions for the first time. After that, the LHC will shut down and work will begin on moving the machine towards 7 TeV per beam.' http://press.web.cern.ch/press/Press.../PR13.09E.html The LHC is back 20.11.2009 The LHC reached its operating temperature of 1.9 Kelvin, or about -271 Celsius, on 8 October. Particles were injected on 23 October, but not circulated. A beam was steered through three octants of the machine on 7 November, and circulating beams have now been re-established. The next important milestone will be low-energy collisions, expected in about a week from now. http://press.web.cern.ch/press/Press.../PR16.09E.html A press conference will be held at CERN, at the Globe of Science and Innovation, at 2pm on Monday 23 November, and webcast at: http://webcast.cern.ch/. Submit your questions to @CERN via Twitter. We cannot guarantee that all questions will be answered. Last edited by no caste; 11-22-2009 at 04:31 PM. |
|
04-04-2010, 06:59 AM | #24 |
Avalon Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 2,375
|
Re: CERN: ATLAS, CIA, Stony Brook/ Brookhaven Nat. Lab
(PhysOrg.com) -- With beams routinely circulating in the Large Hadron Collider at 3.5 TeV, the highest energy yet achieved in a particle accelerator, CERN has set the date for the start of the LHC research programme. The first attempt for collisions at 7 TeV (3.5 TeV per beam) is scheduled for 30 March.
The LHC (large hadron collider) experiments - ALICE, ATLAS, CMS, LHCb, TOTEM, LCHf http://public.web.cern.ch/public/en/lhc/ALICE-en.html |
04-04-2010, 07:26 AM | #25 |
Avalon Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 2,375
|
Re: CERN: ATLAS, CIA, Stony Brook/ Brookhaven Nat. Lab
This was a pretty good video for Nostradamus people. It covered the physics kind of nicely imo - explanatory - whether one might like the Bible aspect or not.
Nostradamus and Bible Prophecies on the CERN LHC causing a Black Hole Doomsday in December 2012 35 minutes 20 Dec 2009 Updated video for 2010. Video on a Prophecy of French Prophet Nostradamus and and also Bible Prophecies on the CERN Large Hadron ... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BJo9hHjgdOk Also Book of Revelation prophecies and King James version English Bible Code matrices on this subject. RAYPOZ in Century 9 Number 44 may refer to the positive ray of the LHC. It raises some earthquake questions too. |
Tags |
brookhaven, cern, large hadron collider, ufo's |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|