US warplane forced to land in Iran

On a side note.

I have never heard the word FUNDAMENTAL used so much in my life. It is everywhere. Everyone is using it. Is this the FUNDAMENTAL times we are in?

This particular story is FUNDAMENTALLY fishy.


FUNDAMENTALLY Namaste!!

[MisterSparks]

Originally Posted by Mummy_bean

Am I the only one who's preferring to believe Iran?

I have to say I'm with you on that. I don't believe any bugger these days...

[Mummy_bean]

Ok - now they are saying it's not Americans, and not an American Jet.

Someone was on that plane....whoooooo????????? ;o)

[carlsweden]

Iran report says U.S. plane violated Iran's airspace
Tue Oct 7, 2008 9:34am EDT Email | Print | Share| Reprints | Single Page | Recommend (0) [-] Text [+]
Featured Broker sponsored link
$0 stock trades. 10 free per month.TEHRAN (Reuters) - An Iranian news agency said on Tuesday that a U.S. military aircraft had unintentionally violated Iranian airspace and been forced to land in Iran, but later allowed to leave.

The semi-official Fars News Agency did not say when the incident happened or give a source for the report, which comes at a time of tension between Tehran and Washington over Iran's disputed nuclear program.

The news agency said five senior U.S. military officials had been interrogated at an Iranian airport and released a day later after it became clear the plane had not entered Iranian airspace intentionally.
Pentagon denies report U.S. plane landed in Iran
Tue Oct 7, 2008 9:34am EDT Email | Print | Share| Reprints | Single Page | Recommend (0) [-] Text [+]
Related News
Iran report says U.S. plane violated Iran's airspace
9:34am EDTFeatured Broker sponsored link
¥ € $ - Learn. Practice. Trade.WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The Pentagon denied on Tuesday an Iranian news report that a U.S. military aircraft had violated Iranian territory and had been forced to land in Iran, saying all American planes were accounted for.

"All aircraft in the region are accounted for and we have no reports of any aircraft landing in Iran," Lt. Col. Patrick Ryder told reporters.

"I haven't heard anything like that," said Pentagon Bryan Whitman.

The Iran news agency reported earlier that a U.S. warplane had violated Iranian territory and had been forced to land in Iran.

(Reporting by Paul Eckert and David Morgan)

-----------------------------------------------------

"After it became clear that they unintentionally entered Iran's air space and their destination was Afghanistan, they were allowed to leave Iran for Afghanistan," Fars said.

In Washington, the Pentagon said it was unaware of any U.S. warplanes being forced to land in Iran and that all U.S. aricraft in the Gulf region were accounted for.

In an initial report, Fars described the aircraft as a warplane. But later it simply called it a "Falcon," giving no further details.

(Reporting by Parisa Hafezi; Editing by Kevin Liffey)

[MisterSparks]

Ah, good old BBC. Confusion reigns...

[christopherthomson]

Another major event prevented?

Or another smokescreen?

Moving to Unconfirmed News till we have exact details on this!

To many conflicting reports from various news agencies

[Event_Horizon]

They've changed their story on the BBC now

Iran 'forces down foreign plane'

http://newsvote.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world...st/7657066.stm

[SpaceMonkey]

bbc news have just said that iranian officials say there were no americans on board and also it isn't a military plane.

[Event_Horizon]

Originally Posted by SpaceMonkey

bbc news have just said that iranian officials say there were no americans on board and also it isn't a military plane.

Something is not right about all this

[vega]

There were no US Generals on board. The plane was a Falcon civilian aircraft. All occupants were released.

1) 5 US Genarals would never travel on the same plane together. Its against pentagon protocol.

2) US Generals don't travel in Falcon Jets. They almost always fly in armed aircraft.

Nothing is going to happen on the 7th.

Peace and Light
Vega

[Thunderbird]

thank goodness the headline plastered all over the news wasnt....
5 generals and top civillian contractors were shot down over iran this morning...which was what was intended

[I_Am]

The where released soon after:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/mid...st/7657066.stm

I'd say, that not all American warriors and not all Iranian ditoes are willing to start the WWIII that their leaders orders them to...maybe Illuminati doesn't have all their sheep in the same path to slaughter.

Remember the "missing" atom bomb plane from last summer? Think that some soliders will prove to have saved millions of american lives.

Doesn't Project Camelot have a story running about all those who mysteriously died soon after - revenge from their masters for not obeying the call?

No doubt something happened. I suspect it was a covert team trying to drop into Iran in the guise of a civilian plane. Somebody was upto something. A jet does not just penetrate Iranian airspace by mistake. If it is just as simple as that then I hope I never have that Captain as my pilot.

Namaste

[tandiwe]

Huge sigh of relief.

[MisterSparks]

The BBC have said it was a Hungarian plane that landed a week ago with no Americans on it at all.

Move along people, nothing to see here...

[JesterTerrestrial]

Don't believe the hype!

well at least i Don't.

[lehomonuka]

uh oppps, flying low to avoid the radar....
caught red handed and the Pentagon denies it
you can bet the Iranians are going over every inch of that plane
before they give it back,if they do.

[Ali Quadir]

Guys... How exactly DO you fit 5 generals into one falcon? Do you attach them to the missile pods or do they sit on top? Maybe I am thinking of the wrong plane, I am no expert. But apart from the millenium falcon and another super scifi spacecraft this is the only falcon I could find.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/F-16_Fighting_Falcon

Do we have people who know airplanes here?

Originally Posted by Ali Quadir

Guys... How exactly DO you fit 5 generals into one falcon? Do you attach them to the missile pods or do they sit on top? Maybe I am thinking of the wrong plane, I am no expert. But apart from the millenium falcon and another super scifi spacecraft this is the only falcon I could find.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/F-16_Fighting_Falcon

Do we have people who know airplanes here?

This could be the plane in question.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dassault_Falcon_900

Or there is this one.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dassault_Falcon_50


or this link to loads of them.


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dassault_Falcon_20

[Operator]

Originally Posted by vega

There were no US Generals on board. The plane was a Falcon civilian aircraft. All occupants were released.

1) 5 US Genarals would never travel on the same plane together. Its against pentagon protocol.

2) US Generals don't travel in Falcon Jets. They almost always fly in armed aircraft.

Nothing is going to happen on the 7th.

Peace and Light
Vega

Unless something else was going on .... I heard some top military people were planning something against Bush ... ?

I am sure, if so, they will not be doing that IN the pentagon, nor will they follow pentagon rules ...

How it all fits in, I have no clue. But sometimes you find answers by thinking outside of the box ... (as we all know).

Cheers

[Reveling John]

So.... does this still count as 'unconfirmed' news. Considering that the whole world will know about it in a few hours.

[Reveling John]

Nevermind

[rinauldi]

Unconfirmed? Confirmed? Who knows?

Does it meet the magic criteria?

* Is it accurate
* Is it verifiable from at leat 2 different sources
* Is it relevant to the current situation

Seems that stifiling policies have brought posting to a halt. Did Cheney infiltrate as an admin? lol