A major new Camelot interview -- Bob Dean: The Coming of Nibiru

Realview · 10-22-2008, 08:20 PM

Mr. Dean says a lot of things that everyone else hears and knows about. He also makes comments like "Original Sin doesn't exist" that seem to come from his belief system. He talks about all kinds of detail pictures but he doesn't show any. He seems to hold the Jesuits in high regard and the Mormon Founder who's life is more like Hitler, Stalin, Castro or Saddam Hussein. IE a weak, feeble person with no hope, no future but given a money making opportunity.

Really, nothing substantial just hype. Not sure why he asked to be interviewed. Congress can't give the president new powers the congress can't get new powers (article 10 bill of rights). Yet, he says nothing about that only that it's been done. In other words I don't see much substance here. He emphasizes new species etc.. He clearly doesn't understand the value and uniqueness of the human being. Most of what he says is just his opinion. Yes, he has some unique background for an opinion but that doesn't seem to real amount to much. Talks about Jesus as important even though it's clear Jesus, Horas, Mithra are but a few presentations of the same myth.

10-22-2008, 08:20 PM	#20
Realview Avalon Senior Member Join Date: Sep 2008 Posts: 92	Re: A major new Camelot interview -- Bob Dean: The Coming of Nibiru Mr. Dean says a lot of things that everyone else hears and knows about. He also makes comments like "Original Sin doesn't exist" that seem to come from his belief system. He talks about all kinds of detail pictures but he doesn't show any. He seems to hold the Jesuits in high regard and the Mormon Founder who's life is more like Hitler, Stalin, Castro or Saddam Hussein. IE a weak, feeble person with no hope, no future but given a money making opportunity. Really, nothing substantial just hype. Not sure why he asked to be interviewed. Congress can't give the president new powers the congress can't get new powers (article 10 bill of rights). Yet, he says nothing about that only that it's been done. In other words I don't see much substance here. He emphasizes new species etc.. He clearly doesn't understand the value and uniqueness of the human being. Most of what he says is just his opinion. Yes, he has some unique background for an opinion but that doesn't seem to real amount to much. Talks about Jesus as important even though it's clear Jesus, Horas, Mithra are but a few presentations of the same myth.