The Destroyer Star & The Future of mankind - Page 4

Carol · 02-07-2010, 05:12 PM

Here is the Graham Hancock interview that I believe Lucas referenced.

Supernatural

Digging deep is the hallmark of the archeo-astronomist and spiritual shamanic seeker Graham Hancock. It is a rare pleasure to speak to such an erudite speaker such as Graham, fresh from his lecture at the Conference for Precession and Ancient Knowledge. Y
In Graham's lastest book, Supernatural, he sets out to investigate this mysterious 'before and after moment' and to discover the truth about the influences that gave birth to the modern human mind.

http://www.consciousmedianetwork.com...s/ghancock.htm

viking · 02-08-2010, 05:57 PM

Found this on my travels...interesting article...

Along with Planet X showing up on SOHO images http://www.zetatalk.com/newsletr/issue163.htm as a Winged Globe or Moon Swirls and on Stereo Ahead as a Red Cross, the individual moons have shown up on the Stereo images! A blitz of evidence that Planet X is in the inner solar system and between the Earth and Sun, as stated by the Zetas all along. This is finally forcing the discussion on many message boards where the majority of the members are reluctant to admit the truth about the coming cataclysms. There was much speculation on a GodlikeProduction message board thread regarding objects seen on the Stereo Behind images.

Image of the Sun, taken by the SECCHI Extreme Ultraviolet Imager (EUVI) on the STEREO Behind observatory . The 195 Angstrom bandpass is sensitive to the Fe XII ionization state of iron, at a characteristic temperature of about 1.4 million degrees Kelvin.

VIDEO: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8POHkMQg0Dw
IMAGE: Moons on Stereo

NASA proffered an explanation to Colin Andrews, saying they are compression artifacts caused by iron (not saying where the iron is located out there in space), not really there, just an illusion, and stating that they will go in and fix those images to make all those compression artifacts go away. In other words, anticipate doctored images.

What you're seeing are compression artifacts, highly magnified. We have to compress the images digitally in order to keep a good rate of taking them and still be able to telemeter them back (across an increasing distance, which weakens the signal and limits how much data we can send per unit time) to earth. The images you are looking at in the video are "space weather beacon mode" images that are telemetered down nearly continuously: in near-realtime, and are both binned (undersampled spatially, down to 512 x 512 pixels) and heavily, lossily compressed digitally onboard (analogous to the various JPEG compression settings on a digital camera, but much more severe). Then they're made available on the Website in a variety of magnifications or "upresings" which only magnify the artifacts. Usually, by now (that is, three days or more after the data were obtained), we'd have the full-resolution (2048 x 2048 pixel) images, which are much less heavily, but still lossily, compressed, and are played back to a Deep Space Network (DSN) ground station via the high-gain antenna on one of the STEREO spacecraft. Unfortunately, a piece of ground hardware at DSN failed, and we're only now catching up on the full-resolution data from January 18 onward - except the lower-resolution (512 x 512) beacon mode data. People first started seeing the odd images around that date, when there was a moderate solar energetic particle event, but those up-resed images have now been replaced on the SSC Website with the full resolution ones. DSN has caught us up to January 20, the last time I checked. The compression artifacts are particularly obvious when a particle (cosmic ray or solar energetic, charged particle) hits the CCD detector on the spacecraft head-on. (Grazing hits show up as bright streaks.) The compression scheme has a hard time mathematically representing sharp, single- or few-pixel features, and you get a characteristic pattern of a bright dot in the middle of a compression block (a subsection of the image) surrounded by a pattern of dark dots.
Best,
Joe Gurman
(Dr.) Joseph B. Gurman
STEREO Project Scientist

The Zetas had lots to say about all of this, promising more drama in the future.

ZetaTalk Explanation 1/27/2010: Recently the Internet was abuzz with images from NASA's Stereo Behind satellite, showing what is purported to be Earth-sized objects circling and close to the Sun. The assumption was made that these objects were circling the Sun, as the traditional trajectories of round-and-round or a comet trajectory slinging slowly past the Sun were assumed. What else is there? In man's limited knowledge, there is so much about Planet X that does not fit, does not have a slot. Thus the sling orbit of Planet X past the Sun, and the Moon Swirls of Planet X have no place in mankind's knowledgebase. Even when it is obvious. Planet X is in the vicinity. As the Winged Globe http://www.zetatalk.com/index/zeta550.htm showing up on a C3 images demonstrate. As the Red Cross showing up on the Stereo Ahead images demonstrate. And as numerous Moon Swirls, compete with trailing red dust tails, demonstrate. These are a few examples that have given NASA fits, as they are tasked with denying the presence of Planet X in the inner solar system.

NASA's Stereo cameras overlap, recording the areas in front of the Sun, and this is where Planet X rides at present, slightly to the right of the Sun in the view from Earth. Thus, the corpus of Planet X appears on the Stereo Ahead images on rare occasions. But the Moon Swirls can waft a long distance from the corpus of Planet X, when hosed out from the magnetic N Pole of Planet X and caught in the turmoil of conflicting magnetic fields, and thus can cross over to the area visible to the Stereo Behind camera. This is what has been sighted. These moons of Planet X are not Earth sized, though many are larger than the Earth's Moon.

We have stated that under normal circumstances for Planet X and its entourage, the large Moons in the swirls are no further from Planet X than 5 million miles. Thus, at the moment of passage when the Earth is pulled toward Planet X so as to be as close as 14 million miles, these moons will not be a danger to Earth. The 5 million mile distance is true when Planet X is out in space, subject only to its own magnetic field, or standing upright in alignment with the Sun's magnetic field. But when Planet X is in the midst of a 270° roll it is at cross currents to the Sun's magnetic field, and is engaging the Earth's magnetic field into a merged field. Thus, on occasion, these moons are blown some distance from the corpus of Planet X, due to magneton crowding. This potential does not last, ending during the last weeks when the Earth begins to stop its rotation and be drawn toward Planet X to the point where it is only some 14 millions miles away. But in the meantime, mankind can have some heart-stopping moments. If you think the current situation is drama, just wait!

viking

bashi · 02-08-2010, 07:51 PM

NASA: Never A Straight Answer !

Quote: " we're only now catching up on the full-resolution data from January 18 onward - except the lower-resolution (512 x 512) beacon mode data. People first started seeing the odd images around that date, when there was a moderate solar energetic particle event"

Two lies in one sentence:
(Dr.) Joseph B. Gurman is suggesting that only the full resolution pictures have these compression artefacts, and not the 512x512 pics which are in a different transmission mode. He is obviously thinking that the UFOs would not show up at low resolution. Hey Joe, you are unlucky:

2048 resolution:

512 resolution:

even in 256 resolution:

Then he says that arround 18th January these artefacts are showing up, suggesting a radiation event as a possible cause:

This pic is from 2nd November last year:

It's sheer arrogance...

.

02-07-2010, 05:12 PM	#76
Carol Project Avalon Hero Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: Big Island, Hawaii Posts: 2,008	Re: The Destroyer Star & The Future of mankind Here is the Graham Hancock interview that I believe Lucas referenced. Supernatural Digging deep is the hallmark of the archeo-astronomist and spiritual shamanic seeker Graham Hancock. It is a rare pleasure to speak to such an erudite speaker such as Graham, fresh from his lecture at the Conference for Precession and Ancient Knowledge. Y In Graham's lastest book, Supernatural, he sets out to investigate this mysterious 'before and after moment' and to discover the truth about the influences that gave birth to the modern human mind. http://www.consciousmedianetwork.com...s/ghancock.htm __________________ Aloha, thank you, do jeh, toda, arigato, merci, grazie, salamat po, gracias, tack, sukria, danke schoen, kiitos, dank u, mahalo nui loa Images to nourish the spirit: http://mistsofavalon.invisionplus.ne...&showtopic=198

02-08-2010, 05:57 PM	#77
viking Avalon Senior Member Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: UK Posts: 1,709	Re: The Destroyer Star & The Future of mankind Found this on my travels...interesting article... Along with Planet X showing up on SOHO images http://www.zetatalk.com/newsletr/issue163.htm as a Winged Globe or Moon Swirls and on Stereo Ahead as a Red Cross, the individual moons have shown up on the Stereo images! A blitz of evidence that Planet X is in the inner solar system and between the Earth and Sun, as stated by the Zetas all along. This is finally forcing the discussion on many message boards where the majority of the members are reluctant to admit the truth about the coming cataclysms. There was much speculation on a GodlikeProduction message board thread regarding objects seen on the Stereo Behind images. Image of the Sun, taken by the SECCHI Extreme Ultraviolet Imager (EUVI) on the STEREO Behind observatory . The 195 Angstrom bandpass is sensitive to the Fe XII ionization state of iron, at a characteristic temperature of about 1.4 million degrees Kelvin. VIDEO: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8POHkMQg0Dw IMAGE: Moons on Stereo NASA proffered an explanation to Colin Andrews, saying they are compression artifacts caused by iron (not saying where the iron is located out there in space), not really there, just an illusion, and stating that they will go in and fix those images to make all those compression artifacts go away. In other words, anticipate doctored images. What you're seeing are compression artifacts, highly magnified. We have to compress the images digitally in order to keep a good rate of taking them and still be able to telemeter them back (across an increasing distance, which weakens the signal and limits how much data we can send per unit time) to earth. The images you are looking at in the video are "space weather beacon mode" images that are telemetered down nearly continuously: in near-realtime, and are both binned (undersampled spatially, down to 512 x 512 pixels) and heavily, lossily compressed digitally onboard (analogous to the various JPEG compression settings on a digital camera, but much more severe). Then they're made available on the Website in a variety of magnifications or "upresings" which only magnify the artifacts. Usually, by now (that is, three days or more after the data were obtained), we'd have the full-resolution (2048 x 2048 pixel) images, which are much less heavily, but still lossily, compressed, and are played back to a Deep Space Network (DSN) ground station via the high-gain antenna on one of the STEREO spacecraft. Unfortunately, a piece of ground hardware at DSN failed, and we're only now catching up on the full-resolution data from January 18 onward - except the lower-resolution (512 x 512) beacon mode data. People first started seeing the odd images around that date, when there was a moderate solar energetic particle event, but those up-resed images have now been replaced on the SSC Website with the full resolution ones. DSN has caught us up to January 20, the last time I checked. The compression artifacts are particularly obvious when a particle (cosmic ray or solar energetic, charged particle) hits the CCD detector on the spacecraft head-on. (Grazing hits show up as bright streaks.) The compression scheme has a hard time mathematically representing sharp, single- or few-pixel features, and you get a characteristic pattern of a bright dot in the middle of a compression block (a subsection of the image) surrounded by a pattern of dark dots. Best, Joe Gurman (Dr.) Joseph B. Gurman STEREO Project Scientist The Zetas had lots to say about all of this, promising more drama in the future. ZetaTalk Explanation 1/27/2010: Recently the Internet was abuzz with images from NASA's Stereo Behind satellite, showing what is purported to be Earth-sized objects circling and close to the Sun. The assumption was made that these objects were circling the Sun, as the traditional trajectories of round-and-round or a comet trajectory slinging slowly past the Sun were assumed. What else is there? In man's limited knowledge, there is so much about Planet X that does not fit, does not have a slot. Thus the sling orbit of Planet X past the Sun, and the Moon Swirls of Planet X have no place in mankind's knowledgebase. Even when it is obvious. Planet X is in the vicinity. As the Winged Globe http://www.zetatalk.com/index/zeta550.htm showing up on a C3 images demonstrate. As the Red Cross showing up on the Stereo Ahead images demonstrate. And as numerous Moon Swirls, compete with trailing red dust tails, demonstrate. These are a few examples that have given NASA fits, as they are tasked with denying the presence of Planet X in the inner solar system. NASA's Stereo cameras overlap, recording the areas in front of the Sun, and this is where Planet X rides at present, slightly to the right of the Sun in the view from Earth. Thus, the corpus of Planet X appears on the Stereo Ahead images on rare occasions. But the Moon Swirls can waft a long distance from the corpus of Planet X, when hosed out from the magnetic N Pole of Planet X and caught in the turmoil of conflicting magnetic fields, and thus can cross over to the area visible to the Stereo Behind camera. This is what has been sighted. These moons of Planet X are not Earth sized, though many are larger than the Earth's Moon. We have stated that under normal circumstances for Planet X and its entourage, the large Moons in the swirls are no further from Planet X than 5 million miles. Thus, at the moment of passage when the Earth is pulled toward Planet X so as to be as close as 14 million miles, these moons will not be a danger to Earth. The 5 million mile distance is true when Planet X is out in space, subject only to its own magnetic field, or standing upright in alignment with the Sun's magnetic field. But when Planet X is in the midst of a 270° roll it is at cross currents to the Sun's magnetic field, and is engaging the Earth's magnetic field into a merged field. Thus, on occasion, these moons are blown some distance from the corpus of Planet X, due to magneton crowding. This potential does not last, ending during the last weeks when the Earth begins to stop its rotation and be drawn toward Planet X to the point where it is only some 14 millions miles away. But in the meantime, mankind can have some heart-stopping moments. If you think the current situation is drama, just wait! viking

02-08-2010, 07:51 PM	#78
bashi Avalon Senior Member Join Date: Dec 2009 Posts: 214	Re: The Destroyer Star & The Future of mankind NASA: Never A Straight Answer ! Quote: " we're only now catching up on the full-resolution data from January 18 onward - except the lower-resolution (512 x 512) beacon mode data. People first started seeing the odd images around that date, when there was a moderate solar energetic particle event" Two lies in one sentence: (Dr.) Joseph B. Gurman is suggesting that only the full resolution pictures have these compression artefacts, and not the 512x512 pics which are in a different transmission mode. He is obviously thinking that the UFOs would not show up at low resolution. Hey Joe, you are unlucky: 2048 resolution: 512 resolution: even in 256 resolution: Then he says that arround 18th January these artefacts are showing up, suggesting a radiation event as a possible cause: This pic is from 2nd November last year: It's sheer arrogance... .