|
|
![]() |
#1 |
Avalon Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 660
|
![]()
You are correct - I queried this and many older posts
The depth of 10 is frequent - more than normal I use this one to check daily, but there are many more accurate sites. I always asked why 10? Sooooo many at 10? Well perhaps now we have queried, the 'slightly less than 10 figures are cropping up? The 10 and less are soooo disruptive. I asked the seismological research experts in UK for an answer - and zilch response. Thank you for your observations - keep at it - check the depths as I think that is a key. 10 was just tooooo frequent until recently when we questionned and now it changes slightly. Excellent post - and thanks! ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Avalon Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Weymouth, Dorset, UK
Posts: 827
|
![]()
Maybe less then 10 and more disruptive because of the thickness of rock or hardness of general ground, water penetration etc?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Avalon Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Dorset
Posts: 2
|
![]()
This article may be of interest to you:
On November 17 and 18, 2008 nine H-Bombs were exploded below the Arctic Ocean, near the North Magnetic Pole, within Canadian waters. The explosions were concentrated in an area about 16 km by 16 km (10 miles by 10 miles), were in the 5 to 10 Megaton range, all were 10 km (6.2 miles) deep. http://www.wariscrime.com/2008/11/21...-arctic-ocean/ |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Avalon Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 288
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | ||
Avalon Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: florida
Posts: 17
|
![]()
Thank you all for the replies! I am glad others have noticed something odd about these numbers as well.
Quote:
Quote:
Certainly, though, this is an interesting thought. Perhaps these recurring numbers which happen on land are bombs being exploded underground? The USGS website has a separate section for mining blasts, which they say only register on their machines about once every two days, which does not account for the numerous anomalies, even if they somehow register on the main seismic display page. Also, these blasts rarely go deeper than about 1 km. |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Avalon Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: WA, USA
Posts: 187
|
![]()
What a cool post! This is the kind of stuff I like to see here.
Thanks for sharing!!! (I always wanted to be a geologist when i was young, so this gives me something to do and tugs at my interests! Plus, if we can identify what "the man" is doing, then mehbeh we can bring his a$$ down!) |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Avalon Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Dorset
Posts: 2
|
![]()
I wanted to say sooo mujch here but had to delte!! ONE voice, or mind or thoght can chage this, if you wish or think hard enough you can stop any negative exsperiment happening! That is what 'they' don't want you to remember! You're power.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | |
Avalon Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: America
Posts: 427
|
![]() Quote:
What I see showing at the North pole here http://earthquake.usgs.gov/eqcenter/...tho/270_90.php does NOT show the quakes of the 18th. Is there something I'm missing? |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|