hollow earth??

[Average Joe]

Originally Posted by taomation

Why do you have to be so negative and close minded? You are right, they are theories, but until they are proved or disproved you might be wiser to stop condemning them. "Condemnation without investigation is the height of ignorance" Albert Einstein.

I'm not being negative. I'm just saying the earth is not hollow. Why is that a negative statement?

Well?

Call me closed minded, thats fair enough. Negative, no.

Why not read up on the flat earth theory if you are so open minded? There are people that actually believe this and go to great lengths to offer "evidence" and theory towards a flat earth. If you are gullible enough, it could appear quite compelling.

Are flat earth theorists open minded? Or closed minded to anything but their truth? Or just gullible? Or insane?

You can apply that to hollow earth theory. It'd have to be a pretty damn small sun in the centre of the earth, and one that wouldn't burn for very long.

[Average Joe]

Here is a theory.

We on planet earth are part of a vast galaxy of 500 million stars, which is in turn part of an estimated 500 million galaxies, covering an unimaginable distance why is mostly space.

This space which we are contained in, the vast unimaginable space, is actually the space within one singular atom, somewhere between the proton, neutron and electron. As we know, a tiny atom is 99% space. Well the universe is within that space of a singular atom.

And that atom is one of billions of atoms that make up a patch of mould on a block of cheese, in somebodies fridge, on a planet, in a galaxy, within a universe, a vast unimaginable universe...which is contained within the space in a single atom, which is one of billions of atoms, which makes up a cockroaches bumhole, which lives in the corner of a flat, in a country, on a planet, in a galaxy in a universe......

I'd like to see somebody disprove that.

Meanwhile, I'm off to set up my "Universe within an atom, and why THEY hide it from you!" website.

I'll be gone for a couple more minutes, whilst I brush up on my unprovable or undisprovable theory.

[Dean Plejaren]

AJ you don't get it. What you said is a reality......The human body is a holographic representation of the universe. The Hubble telescope looks out and sees exactly what the microscope sees. As Above so Below. Look up the book on the holographic universe. You are correct. Your philosophy is sound.

I knew that a long time ago. But I wouldn't concentrate on cockroaches rear ends and mouldly cheese. I would concentrate on the more exciting things.

However you cannot justify that the hollow earth is not a scientific reality as there is much more evidence for it than the iron core theory. People have written about experiences of the hollow earth such as a pilot officer that flew into it once. There is even photos. What do you have with the iron core? Nothing....speculation. Bunk like science that contradicts itself. Meanwhile the hollow earth explains the magnetic poles among other things about how planets really evolve and form.

[Average Joe]

Originally Posted by Dean Plejaren

AJ you don't get it. What you said is a reality......The human body is a holographic representation of the universe. The Hubble telescope looks out and sees exactly what the microscope sees. As Above so Below. Look up the book on the holographic universe. You are correct. Your philosophy is sound.

I just made it up!

However you cannot justify that the hollow earth is not a scientific reality as there is much more evidence for it than the iron core theory. People have written about experiences of the hollow earth such as a pilot officer that flew into it once.

Thats not evidence! Thats people telling stories! I could tell you I met Santa, is that evidence of Santa?

There is even photos.

Where?

What do you have with the iron core? Nothing....speculation. Bunk like science that contradicts itself.

Disproving an iron core, if possible, does not mean a hollow earth.

Meanwhile the hollow earth explains the magnetic poles among other things about how planets really evolve and form.

I'd have thought that an iron core would be a factor in magnetic poles, but what do I know, I'm not a scientist. Like you, I presume.

[rimax]

As above, so below!

[Allan]

"Condemnation without investigation is the height of ignorance" Albert Einstein.

I agree. Once again, the book is called "The Hollow Earth" by Dr Raymond Bernard. Read it (AJ) and then come back and have an informed chat with us. It'll blow your mind. This guy's done a life time of research on the subject... give him a chance.

[QueenOfLeon]

I too, am convinced the earth is hollow. It makes complete sense given that the point Allan made about matter.
I like this pic...

http://pwg.gsfc.nasa.gov/istp/outrea.../geocorona.jpg

[hobbit]

The hollow earth theory makes perfect sense from a harmonic situation, where all the planets, moons and stars are hollow and bell like, thus resonating at specific frequencies.
All We have been TOLD, and TOLD, and told to repeat, repeat , repeat is ASSUMPTION ( ass-u-me)
The whole spinning and flying through space nonesense is ASSUMPTION.
I consider the whole system is a matrix of fixed points where the moving element is space, the aether.
You have been TOLD and TOLD there is no aether, there is nothing in space, it's all a lie.
But sheep like sheeple do as they are TOLD.
The French call us English Mouton Anglais, because We do as We are told.
If instead of accepting the nonesense You are told, you THINK, and work out that nobody can tell you what gravity is.
Nobody can tell you what light is.
nobody van tell you what time is.
But they will put a baffoon like Einstein up as a G-D and declare as FACT that E=MC2, what a load of ballocks.

Try and think of everything in space in a sea of aether, a tidal sea of aether, and it circulates around all the created mass, it will create hollow mass, there is no force called gravity, it is an electrical consequence of attraction of a dual spin aether, and our senses see through this giving the illusion of movement.
the moon is the biggest clue, you cannot see the far side, also it is 400 times smaller than the sun, the sun is 400 timesthe distance away, thats because it is a geometric matrix.
All of this is known above 33 rd level masonic, but is kept secret from the sheeple.
Why do you think everything is set out geometrically in America, and london?
Our distant ancestors knew all this with the megaliths.
There will be anothr series of planets inside each planet and stars.
The stars are not radiating light as you have been TOLD, I know it is compelling to think that light comes from the sun, but it is local, light is a consequence of aether flows meeting, as each formed bell like mass radiates a frequency that interacts with the other radiating fields produced by other bell like formed mass.
our main source of this harmonic interaction is with the sun, but the light is produced local around the earth, there is no light or heat in space as there is no interferance of resonant fields.
gravity is not centred to the centre of the planet , it would implode, it's nonesense.
Wake up.
Hobbit

[QueenOfLeon]

Originally Posted by rogue2

i like that pic too...but, out of interest: is it relevant to this topic?

it would appear to be the reaction between the magnetosphere and charged solar particles producing auroras.

i just want to make sure that you didnt include that as a form of evidence for hollow earth. great pic tho...

**
on a side note: geophysicists interprete seismic data as evidence for the inside of the earth (not the center/core) but the lower mantle as being liquid since 1 of the 2 types of seismic waves cannot travel thru it.

if the center of the earth was hollow (or filled with "air") then the compression waves would travel thru it. you can not compress a liquid, but you can compress a gas (shock waves/compressed gas tanks, etc).

the theory of the materials that comprise the lower mantle being liquid is supported by our knowledge of what happens to certain materials when under the temperatures & pressures theorized to exist within the earth at those depths. seismic data (speed of waves traveling thru mediums) also support this, as do analog modeling.

the hollow earth theory, although compelling, has to defy fundamental laws of physics, decades of research, and millions of human hours of research that supports the current paradigm of planetary structure. not to say that it cant do that, but it must to break the paradigm that is upheld every time an earthquake goes off (thousands of times a day). for, an image of the earth is generated every time a boom happens, and the same picture is revealed. if the center of the earth was "hollow", then the thousands of scientists that study the earth would have evidence to support this.

now...the stories of underground bases/large cavernous areas w/in the crust...those would not need to have the earth being "hollow", but it would (probably) have to have some sort of advanced technology to keep it from collapsing due to the fact that the crust is constantly flowing and shifting as we speak. everywhere, every second. every rock.

Sorry if it is incorrect, however I found this pic long ago whilst researching Hollow earth, as all I hoped for was some kind of visual. So I simply googled hollow earth and found that.

I have read that the auroura's are phenomena from the inner sun, which is obviously not the official story.

compelling none the less....

Originally Posted by rimax

As above, so below!

Hmmm very profound statement

"As Above"

We have oceans...

"So Below"

According to National Geographic we have oceans at 600 miles below the surface




Huge Underground "Ocean" Found Beneath Asia
Richard A. Lovett
for National Geographic News
February 27, 2007
A giant blob of water the size of the Arctic Ocean has been discovered hundreds of miles beneath eastern Asia, scientists report

http://news.nationalgeographic.com/n...cean-asia.html

Huge 'Ocean' Discovered Inside Earth | LiveScience
Feb 28, 2007 ... reservoir beneath Asia that is at least the volume of the Arctic Ocean....
http://www.livescience.com/environme...g_anomoly.html


Even made Fox News...
Scientists Discover Subterranean 'Ocean' Under Eastern Asia
Wednesday, February 28, 2007
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,255486,00.html

So...

As Oceans Above, So Oceans Below

[silverlightning]

I have heard several channellers talk about hollow earth. Some talk about beings, people, elfs, lemuria, antpeople etc. They are not referring to the three dimensional world of standard physics, they are searching for knowledge from a heightened conciousness. It's often related to mind, chakras.

I have wondered what David Wilcock is channelling, it's above my head. I would have loved to talk to him about this stuff. He has this theory that humans are deprived of knowledge we are suppose to have, and that forces are doing all they can for things to stay as they are. Not all channellers take the same position, some see it as mankind's point of departure and each individuals spiritual development will heighten our wisdom and knowledge.

[Jasper]

Watch this video clip, http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/7418041.stm.

The interesting bit occurs at around 50 seconds, why the grey circles?
I emailed the BBC for an answer, but of course didn't get a reply.

Bhuvan is the new Asian satellite service, http://www.bhuvan.nrsc.gov.in/.
Their service does not cover the entire globe, images such as the Poles are supplied to them by a third party. Note the lack of 'fogging' compared to the Google images.

If you watch this video clip and note the 'dot' where the light seems to emanate from, then compare it with the same area on the Bhuvan shot, note the 'mottled' affect which seems to be squared off.

http://www.nasa.gov/mov/133778main_FUV_640x480.mov

[Bilko]

I was rubbish in science hence my maybe naive question.
Does there need to be material between the two poles ( north and south ) for them to function as such?
I mean is it possible to have a hollow metallic globe that still has a definite magnetic north and south?

In recent years i always thought the earth would be more honeycombed than hollow. there may be vast expanses of air trapped during the planets formation. Hundreds of miles wide even. A central sun could be artificial ( the start of creation being thought ) suggesting that imagination is the limit of creation. it could be a crystal formation that harnesses light from above.

[micjer]

Originally Posted by Jasper

Watch this video clip, http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/7418041.stm.

The interesting bit occurs at around 50 seconds, why the grey circles?
I emailed the BBC for an answer, but of course didn't get a reply.

Bhuvan is the new Asian satellite service, http://www.bhuvan.nrsc.gov.in/.
Their service does not cover the entire globe, images such as the Poles are supplied to them by a third party. Note the lack of 'fogging' compared to the Google images.

If you watch this video clip and note the 'dot' where the light seems to emanate from, then compare it with the same area on the Bhuvan shot, note the 'mottled' affect which seems to be squared off.

http://www.nasa.gov/mov/133778main_FUV_640x480.mov

Great info.

I would say that we are looking down the same rabbit hole. Why the cover-up? I had seen the antarctic vid before. That light sure seems to be coming from within the earth.

[micjer]

Here is an interesting vid that makes sense to me.



One question I have with this theory is where did the water for the oceans come from. On the other hand ..... where did all of the water come from anyway?

[Jasper]

Great video. Perhaps the water came from the inner Earth through the poles.
It has been muted that the Earth was repositioned into the Goldilocks zone for the mammalian experiment to begin. This may have changed the energies entering the planet causing it to expand like a balloon.

Did we swap places with Mars, which has since contracted?

[Truth voice 2012]

Originally Posted by Average Joe

It'd have to be a pretty damn small sun in the centre of the earth, and one that wouldn't burn for very long.

Thats assuming that stars are similar to nuclear reactors. The inner earth theory makes more sense if we look at the sun as an eletro magnetic plasma ball (Which it is) that receives its energy from the centre of the galaxy. The star then acts like a network hub dispersing that energy to the planets central stars. This is just my theory on why hollow earh could be real. Ive seen other seismic evidence too that points towards a hollow earth. Theres definatly something down there and it aint iron. Its more of a consistancy of gas than anything. I aint saying its air and there are people and cities down there but what Ive seen proof of is that the sun is electro magnetic, not a nuclear reaction like were led to believe and the centre of our planet has less density than a liquid.

[hobbit]

Truth voice 2012,
Hello,
The story TOLD of the sun and stars been nuclear reactors is very convincing, seeing as nobody can go and check, or can they?

The sun , imho, is not radiating light, but as You point out it does radiate out the interferance pattern as it acts as a resistor to the free flow of space, which on a larger scale will be exactly the same from an even far larger planet at the centre of the galaxy, which will be just part of an even larger scale, etc etc etc.
I stop at that sort of point or it gives you headache.
The aether is flowing, I can follow it about , this is often referred to as dragon lines in dowsing circles, there are many differnt such flows, they are basically differnt harmonic frequency flows that merge and implode into creation.
Space is not nothing as TOLD, it is no-thing, which is vastly different.
it becomes 3Dcreation when it resonates in geometric brilliance of fixed points that are all to Fibonacci fractal sequences.

This can all be followed and measured across the surface area, it is in a form of trinity, there is a neutral dead straight lined geometry that allows free passage to the 720 degree spin aether flows that are mirror like faced, light is entrapped inside this along with other stuff that all creation is coalesced from.
Our actual selves are not 3D which our biological bodies are.
the planet will be to scale exactly as what can be measured at the surface, and will follow this geometry inwards and outwards, hence as above , so below, it's all about mirror planes.
We need to do as Alice did, and step through the looking glass.
Charles lutwidge Dodgson, who wrote Alice, was a mathmatician without equal.
It is all about geometry, and I can measure it all.
hobbit

[Steven]

I believe the Earth is hollow. I believe a planet not being hollow is the exception. Especially with this point of view, Nassim Haramein with the Grand Unified Field Theory: http://video.google.com/videosearch?...haramein&src=2

His web site: http://www.theresonanceproject.org/

Namaste, Steven

Originally Posted by Steven

I believe the Earth is hollow. I believe a planet not being hollow is the exception. Especially with this point of view, Nassim Haramein with the Grand Unified Field Theory: http://video.google.com/videosearch?...haramein&src=2

His web site: http://www.theresonanceproject.org/

Namaste, Steven

Correct. Was going to post that....

[pineal-pilot-in merkabah]

wow i like the info people have put into this thread. i started researching it last night after looking at hyperborea and the capital of the mythical land?(ultima thule) hence the thule society. one of the tribes of israel DAN was the precursor to vikings who were said to be tall blond blue eyed god like men.. i was trying to tie those together. im leaning more towards hollow earth as i keep going in my research.

[KathyT]

If one checks Google Earth, you will find there is a complete cover-up of the North pole at all times. They do not show any part of the entire Artic ICE CAP, yet it is there. What are they hiding?
I also noticed that there is a strange large circle in Antarctica on Google Earth.

The distance of that whole "circle" image on Antartica is about a thousand miles across. When I dropped that image into Photoshop, and used an adjustment tool called “Curves” to darken and work with contrasting tones, I was stunned with what I got! Notice the very bright light at the very center of the South pole! It is as if there is something very bright at that location shining out that the satellite cameras picked up!


A month ago I took a digital picture of our sun through a welding helmet lens and loaded it into Photoshop. The trees and landscape were fine, but the sun was a ‘blob’. When I tried to darken the sun to get an outline, it wouldn’t, there simply were not any adjoining pixels which Photoshop could darken.

When I realized the significance of this South Pole image, I started to remember a couple of other things I’d read about weeks and months ago. There is this interesting website about Jupiter with NASA images that animate at http://hollowjupiter.blogspot.com/ and it alleges that sunlight shines out from the poles at Jupiter, that website looks like this:


I have tried diligently to find other accurate pictures of our poles. I found this website at the University of Illinois, which shows you some NASA images of the North Pole Ice cap: http://arctic.atmos.uiuc.edu/cryosphere Note the convenient ‘black dot’ that they place directly over the north pole… what are they hiding under the black dots?


There is an amazing 10 part series titled “Inside the Hollow Earth” on You Tube by author Rodney Cluff. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uIRdDA_EDfM

The question remains, what is being hidden under the images NASA gives us about the North and South Poles, right under our noses on Google Earth?

[pineal-pilot-in merkabah]

yes i saw the cover up pics on google earth.. something is going on for sure. im thinking its a reality more and more.. there is a russian nuke ice cutter going there sometime early 09 to see whats going on up there.. rodney cluff the mormon is gong with a few sceientists and other skilled people

[pineal-pilot-in merkabah]

Originally Posted by hobbit

Truth voice 2012,
Hello,
The story TOLD of the sun and stars been nuclear reactors is very convincing, seeing as nobody can go and check, or can they?

The sun , imho, is not radiating light, but as You point out it does radiate out the interferance pattern as it acts as a resistor to the free flow of space, which on a larger scale will be exactly the same from an even far larger planet at the centre of the galaxy, which will be just part of an even larger scale, etc etc etc.
I stop at that sort of point or it gives you headache.
The aether is flowing, I can follow it about , this is often referred to as dragon lines in dowsing circles, there are many differnt such flows, they are basically differnt harmonic frequency flows that merge and implode into creation.
Space is not nothing as TOLD, it is no-thing, which is vastly different.
it becomes 3Dcreation when it resonates in geometric brilliance of fixed points that are all to Fibonacci fractal sequences.

This can all be followed and measured across the surface area, it is in a form of trinity, there is a neutral dead straight lined geometry that allows free passage to the 720 degree spin aether flows that are mirror like faced, light is entrapped inside this along with other stuff that all creation is coalesced from.
Our actual selves are not 3D which our biological bodies are.
the planet will be to scale exactly as what can be measured at the surface, and will follow this geometry inwards and outwards, hence as above , so below, it's all about mirror planes.
We need to do as Alice did, and step through the looking glass.
Charles lutwidge Dodgson, who wrote Alice, was a mathmatician without equal.
It is all about geometry, and I can measure it all.
hobbit

THIS IS VERY INTERESTING..

[piers2210]

Great thread. I believe that there is life going on inside planet earth, and has been for many thousands of years. As Bertrand Russell once said, we will believe what we want to believe, regardless of the evidence, but in this case there is no reason not to believe, and there is sound "evidence" to support this, as indicated here.

As a separate point, there are many channelled indications from other planetary systems that there is life below earth : there is a lot of references to it in some detail in Patricia Cori's "Atlantis Rising", which is channelled communications from the Sirian High Council (see www.sirianrevelations.net). We can't "prove" anything from channelled writings, so it is up to the individual to "believe" or not. The book is a great read anyway.