Have you read the Ground Crew books ?

[Frame Dragger]

I have read part of one. I wish I could say I profited from it, but I ridged up immediately due to the "everything you know is wrong" style of writing.

If we are that hopeless, why bother with us? We must have something going for us if we are looking around for answers.

I get a queasy feeling from him too, as if he is a disinformation agent sent in to make trouble. Mind you, I don't know this to be true in any way, I just get a "bad vibe" from him, unlike most of the people Bill and Kerry have interviewed. At times there is an almost contemptuous tone to his replies to questions, as if he thinks he is talking to mouth-breathing dupes at his masters' request.

[Anchor]

I agree with all of you in some measure - but I refuse to be dragged into any discussion on whether or not he either is or is not of the best intent or character. I have seen how that plays out with some of the the other personalities, whistleblowers and witnesses on here.

I strongly feel that it is best to concentrate on the message and not the messenger.

Do I agree with every line in the paradigm series - no.

Do I think they are worth reading - you betcha

A..

[Alkhemist]

Originally Posted by Anchor

I agree with all of you in some measure - but I refuse to be dragged into any discussion on whether or not he either is or is not of the best intent or character.

No worries, Anchor -- no one's trying to "drag" you anywhere.

My intent in my previous post was not to attack Mr. Green, but only to ask if others had experience with intuition in this regard. One of the skills that I think are extremely important in this so-called "New Paradigm" is learning to trust one's gut when it comes to sorting out the truth. My interest was in judging the merit of my own reaction by whether others had felt the same (at least in part).

I strongly feel that it is best to concentrate on the message and not the messenger.

I would normally agree, but in the current climate, I'm not so sure that's the best approach. After watching the interviews that Bill and Kerry have done, we've learned that there is a great deal of misinformation out there. We've also learned that anything causing fear should be carefully weighed since negative emotions, at least from a spiritual standpoint, can attract the very things we fear.

Regardless of whether Mr. Green is genuine or not, I certainly hope he's wrong about much of what he says.

[Anchor]

No worries, Anchor -- no one's trying to "drag" you anywhere.

Um yes ok, sorry, that was my ego getting in the way.

Consider a set of words containing truth.

Would it make any difference to you if they were delivered by Icke, Jesus of Nazereth, Wilcock, Bush or Cheney?

To allow ones sense of discrimination to be predjudiced by what one thinks of the messenger is to foil its fidelity.

No-one will ever convince me something is a lie, just because of who says it.

A..

[china2012]

.

[gretsico]

if you found the books in a box in a forest, with no clues as to who left it there or whos hand penned it, would you try to imagine who the author would be, and speculate &wonder?
Or would you sit down with them and revel in their delights?

Read Digest Reread

[china2012]

.

[Alkhemist]

Originally Posted by Anchor

Would it make any difference to you if they were delivered by Icke, Jesus of Nazereth, Wilcock, Bush or Cheney?

Most definitely. One always has to take into account what agenda a person might have. Words alone mean nothing.

I come from a background of psychology. As a therapist, one of the first things we learn is to read a person through their body language, as well as their known history. Without being able to see the whole person as much as possible, there is little one can do to help them.

Does that mean we should believe everything someone says simply because of who they are? Certainly not. But does it have bearing on how the message is, and should be, taken? Most definitely.

To allow ones sense of discrimination to be predjudiced by what one thinks of the messenger is to foil its fidelity.

If it were indeed "prejudice," I would agree with you. However, I'm talking here about making an informed decision. This is actually the opposite of "prejudice."

No-one will ever convince me something is a lie, just because of who says it.

Nor should they. But one would hope, if Hitler walked up to you today and said he wanted to show you the new tile in his shower, that you would hesitate at least a bit.

[Steven]

Originally Posted by Anchor

...I strongly feel that it is best to concentrate on the message and not the messenger...

Wise words.