|
|
![]() |
#1 | |
Avalon Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,659
|
![]() Quote:
"O" blood types have more tendency to very aggressive immune response. Due to a thyroidectomy in the 70's I find MMS abhorrent -- my body thinks it is poison, but hubby takes it regularly. If I really want to stay happy I should stop reading threads like this :-) peace, Gnosis |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
Avalon Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Arkansas USA
Posts: 156
|
![]() Quote:
~namaste~ |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Avalon Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 214
|
![]()
I think Jones is right on the spot.
The virus is most likely man-made with all the subsequent agendas as intent for doing so. The genetic make-up, the Mexican distribution pattern of the initial infection, the simultaneous appearances of unlikely recombinations in different parts of the world, all this is a smoking gun for manmade/intentional interference. The danger now is that the resurrected 1918 strain has millions of infected people as human bio-labs to figure out some nasty mutated strain by natural recombination. It can jump into animals and use the DNA for its recombination, with no vaccine containing animal DNA required. These new recombination-strains can cause severe havoc. That’s not fear mongering, but viro-logical reality, which Jones only mentions briefly in Part 1. The very dangerous D225 mutation could not establish itself as the next dominant strain, actually – at present - there is NOT ANY dominant strain existing and there is no any new wave in sight. So the 1918 strain is lurking within mankind: It will either peter out or come back with renewed vigour. In any case, by following the guidelines of this thread, there is no threat. ![]() Gnosis5: I do not recommend MMS on a regular basis. It’s only for an “emergency”, because it depletes the body of all the free radical ‘catchers’. I follow this advice: “Do your best, and let GOD do the rest!” This motto calls for a proper preparation… . |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Avalon Senior Member
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 174
|
![]()
Staying happy and in touch with our higher spiritual vibrations will certainly make us much less susceptible to any disease. But it won't work 100.00% of the time. We still need to protect ourselves in a practical, physical way. Surely, as long as we are in a physical body we're not expressing our spirituality optimally unless we're practical about physical realities.
I get ill about once every 10 years, and because I'm a natural psychic healer I'm usually over that and back to normal within a few hours. But it still happens. I really like Bashi's statistic that the intake of vitamin D alone reduces the flu infection rate by a factor of about 20. Maybe that would mean that if there's an epidemic with a mortality rate of 40%, presumably that rate might drop to about 2% in people who've been taking sufficient vitamin D? If so, taking that one precaution alone would make the epidemic 20 times less scary. If we also prepare properly, as Bashi has so clearly and precisely explained, any epidemic will no doubt become thousands of times less scary. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Avalon Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 13
|
![]()
I've been taking vitamin D (cholcecalciferol derived) at about 3000 IU per day since roughly Christmas, after being sick for the whole holiday season. I was sick all the time before that, once a month at least I felt like crap, and now not only have I not been sick since I started the vitamins, I've also felt more "up" in general. I've been diagnosed with seasonal affective disorder (i.e. not enough vitamin D / sunlight causes depression) and it seems that this stuff has worked wonders for me. I've got my wife and daughter onto it now too in anticipation of the next wave of flu - None of us got vaccinated and none of us are going to.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Avalon Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 214
|
![]()
Thank you, trainee.
![]() Basically your calculation is correct. Although the database is too small to have a statistically relevant calculation. The statistic shows the effect of a daily intake of 2000 IU, and I think with 5000 IU you will be even more comfortable. In your example of 40% mortality, it is then not the flu you have to be worried about, but the Mad Max scenario around you, as civilisation falls apart. Even with a 5%.... ![]() . |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|