Intuitive Dissection of the Pete Peterson Information

[Karen]

Originally Posted by tone3jaguar

I am not a moderator, please explain to me how posting up a thread and filling it with information in a rarely used area of the forum is owning the floor. It is not possible to stop others from voicing there opinion here unless you have administrative access. If you are trying to shift perceptions about me you are not being very intellegent about it.

Tone3, If you would just ignore and not respond to such irritants, they would quickly pass.

[tone3jaguar]

Passive resistance is not my style and never will be. If I am challenged I step up to the plate. Sitting in the dug out is for followers.

[iainl140285]

Originally Posted by tone3jaguar

And another thing Tango, you seem to flip flop in your opinions and paradigms like a 90's politician. The only proof we have that you where actually military is that you posted up a youtube video of James from Top Gear riding in a U2 and then you said "Welcome to my world". Do me a favor, actually post up something relevant or go away.

Please do a little homework before making such statements. If someone is mil. its not up to them to prove it unless they are making outlandish claims using a mil. persona.

Tango has not IMHO.
It will litteraly take 5 mins. to research.

[tone3jaguar]

Do a little homework? What you mean like google TANGO. Whatever, the truth is that the people who have a problem with me posting this stuff up are the ones that would like to live in the illusion that these "whistleblowers" are accurate. The idea of not questioning the comments that someone makes because they where in the military and deserve respect defies logic.

[iainl140285]

Originally Posted by tone3jaguar

Do a little homework? What you mean like google TANGO. Whatever, the truth is that the people who have a problem with me posting this stuff up are the ones that would like to live in the illusion that these "whistleblowers" are accurate. The idea of not questioning the comments that someone makes because they where in the military and deserve respect defies logic.

My apologies Tone3, I've just read my post and it comes across more confrontational than I had intended My bad.

You are absolutely right to question the 'whistleblowers'. Many of whom simple plagurise the work of others available on the net and other sources. I dont believe much of what THEY put out. It would also be nice for them to provide documentation to back their claims, in this case you picked up on his mil. status. In another thread someone picked up they would like proff of his education.

Requesting this from 'whistleblowers' IMO, is not un-reasonable at all.

Howwever, my comment was in reference to your post directed at Tango questioning his mil. history. Why? You dont ask me to prove that I work in an office. He hasn't claimed anything. He's not trying to make a name for himself. He's here to help where he can. He is doing his lifes purpose to pay it forward as it were.

You can argue his points certainly. But he will never need to prove his mil. history simply because he has claimed he has been and you would like proof.

Much respect
Iain

[tone3jaguar]

Howwever, my comment was in reference to your post directed at Tango questioning his mil. history. Why? You dont ask me to prove that I work in an office. He hasn't claimed anything. He's not trying to make a name for himself. He's here to help where he can. He is doing his lifes purpose to pay it forward as it were.

He called me out so I called him out back. Immature, maby. Impulsive, maby. Warranted, perhaps not. But when someone comes into a thread and states things like (check wit yo auntie) and (whats the matter you need a girlfriend) and has claimed to be some sort of military or ex-military who is standing up for his own then I am going to call him out.

I would like for someone, anyone to find me an ex-military person who has been in the s--t who spends any time at all typing up sensationalized mass media types of judgements. My guess is no one will never find one. When people have seen crazy ass s--t, it drives the superficial paradigms out of them.

[Sarahmay]

I, for one, really appreciated your very detailed dowsing results. Thank you for posting them!

I apologize if this has been asked before, but have you ever dowsed Anna Hayes' (Ashayana Deane) info?

[tone3jaguar]

No, I am not familiar with her stuff. I encourage people to use the instructions that I made in the other thread in this forum section and discern these things for themselves. I think it is more important that people empower themselves with the knowledge that they can get to the truth with the help of no one else.

[Anchor]

Originally Posted by Tango

If, we all don't follow what you say than *** U?

Whats wrong with YOU...? You need a 'girl friend'.... Someone to give you

some attention; that you Crave... Your, like a ' fly that doesn't go away.'

Let others, give their opinions... They paid their Nickel; let them use it...

Enough of YOUR SLANT. Give it a rest. " I know; I know; *** me very much..."


Tango

Tango,

why dont you give it a rest?

For the n'th time please dont make personal attacks.

A..

[SWIFT]

Hi Unified Serenity ,

Dr Peterson (military servicemen) has put his family at risk as any other individual when they come forward who have had a top secret ID and surley you would reaise death threats are part and parcel of that envoriment which Bill & Kerry suggested already have h..d regarding discloure of further information regarding the Dr Peterson interview.

If people are not happy with Dr Peterson interview maybe they should join a top secret military institution then try and come forward.



Peace & Freedom
SWIFT

[tone3jaguar]

If the people who would disapprove of the information had the opportunity to edit the information by way of Peterson before it was released then how is that risking anything? I do not get it, how is this guy giving the perception that he has released anything that would put him in danger other than the smoke and mirrors about not releasing the video for 2 months?

[Baron]

Originally Posted by tone3jaguar

If the people who would disapprove of the information had the opportunity to edit the information by way of Peterson before it was released then how is that risking anything? I do not get it, how is this guy giving the perception that he has released anything that would put him in danger other than the smoke and mirrors about not releasing the video for 2 months?

I agree this is a very sound point.What risk? Why did he not just be a whistle-blower anonymously and tell the whole story instead of part, of a non story out in the open?

Once gain though I giving him the benefit of the doubt for now and wait for some solid information based on provable or replicative evidence.

Regards
Baron

[Tango]

I'll BACK off... ONLY out of Respect for You A... N' Karen...

It's the method he used that is NOT right... Then Posted it....

[Done on this thread]


Tango

Originally Posted by Anchor

Tango,

why dont you give it a rest?

For the n'th time please dont make personal attacks.

A..

[TraineeHuman]

Tone3Jaguar, I notice your dowsing in most cases gives a low reliability score to the prophets of "meltdown" and of extreme doom and gloom. The exception to that seems to me to be Miriam Delicado, who gets a fairly high score in spite of her “We are in the end times” type of orientation. So I’d certainly be interested in what your dowsing would yield regarding some of the big questions, such as: “Will there be, or are we in, an economic meltdown? And if so, what are some things this is specifically likely to mean?” And: “How many people are likely to die from swine flu in the next four years? (Or what are the likely alternate outcomes?)” And so on.

[TRANCOSO]

Yo Jaguar! Sometimes you're inspired & you make sense, sometimes you're more inspired & I really love you, & sometimes you've already made your point in your first thread, & everything more you come up with, well ... need I say more? Shanti, Tone3Jaguar. We hear you. You're cool.

[THE eXchanger]

Xxx

[tone3jaguar]

Whatever, there has not been very much repeating of info from the first thread. I will continue to post what I feel I want to where I want to and will never really care what others think about it.

[tone3jaguar]

Well, she dowsed up I think at around the mid 60% range. That is good, but it also leaves a lot of what she said on the table.

[Unified Serenity]

Originally Posted by SWIFT

I wonder how many of you would put your familes in front of a firing line to speak out?

Peace & freedom
SWIFT

Swift, I don't think I heard anyone disparage his service in the military. That does not make him a man to just put 100% trust behind. How do you know he has put his family in front of a firing line? If he is following orders to talk about this stuff, all of which seems to be mostly online already, then there is zero risk to his family. I didn't hear him say anything risky.

[waitinginthewings]

T3J: thank you for your work in dowsing. I know this is a rather time consuming job & its useful to compare your answers against our own discernment.

When I started to watch part 1. the first thing that caught my attention was his eyes constantly moving from left to right, as if he was expecting someone to enter the room and take him out. He seemed very nervous & shifty. I found it very distracting & could not focus on his words. The set-up of Dt. Peterson at a desk/table and the positioning of David was really odd. It appeared to make David uncomfortable, because Dr. P was not making direct eye contact with David. & kept looking up at the camera & quick darts to the left & right. Weird set-up.

After about 3 mins into it, my instincts couldn't take anymore of this very
bizarre set-up, & I gave up on it.

I was also surprised to find David W. starting the interview, I was expecting (as usual) Kerry & Bill to conduct it!

I would love to know from Kerry/Bill if David Wilcock is now working with them as a team, and he will be conducting more interviews in the future?

I'm afraid the whole interview was lost on me

[DoctorWho]

Originally Posted by waitinginthewings

When I started to watch part 1. the first thing that caught my attention was his eyes constantly moving from left to right, as if he was expecting someone to enter the room and take him out. He seemed very nervous & shifty. I found it very distracting & could not focus on his words. The set-up of Dt. Peterson at a desk/table and the positioning of David was really odd. It appeared to make David uncomfortable, because Dr. P was not making direct eye contact with David. & kept looking up at the camera & quick darts to the left & right. Weird set-up.

Do what I do, just don't "watch" the video, just "Listen" to the audio.
Bill "the Doctor"

[waitinginthewings]

Originally Posted by DoctorWho

Do what I do, just don't "watch" the video, just "Listen" to the audio.
Bill "the Doctor"

tks Doc. but my BS detectors were screaming at me to not waste my time on this guy.

I do wonder though why this guy and others do public interviews if they are not allowed to speak freely? He appeared so fearful, as if he did not want to be there, so why did he do it? What is to be gained by him or the public. To me this is insane.

Can you imagine a career where you have to watch every word you say, or if you slip up you might be killed. Why keep a career like that.? Its sheer madness.

[Northern Boy]

Ok TJ3 I have to tell you some thing as a machinist I have machined many types of materials and I can say this once a material has been heat treated and hardened it becomes very brittle it is stong as h*ll but depending on the hardness of it some and its shape I would have to agree with Pete what temp s do nuclear reactors run at the higher the temp the more brittle a material becomes . I have seen pcs machined and hardened that come out after cooling and you can see cracks in them and they then become paper weights so it true .

Then again in order to take some of the hardening properties out of steel you need to heat it to a certain temperature so these things are possible

I kind of new something was "fishy" when he acted as though the name of a fish with special oil in it was above top secret information. LOL

Not fishy at all Its not so much about the fish as what you get out of the fish here is the information he was talking about http://www.westonaprice.org/basicnut...k2.html#closer

[sunflower]

(FALSE) The Tibetans drill holes in their foreheads in order to unshroud the Pineal Gland.

I chuckled when I heard the above. Lobsang Rampa described this exact procedure that was done to him in his third book ("The Third Eye" if I recall correctly).

[Northern Boy]

I have read that book as well Sunflower

Here is a link to some of his stuff http://www.galactic-server.com/rampa/#english