|
![]() |
#7 |
Avalon Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 56
|
![]()
unfortunately bentham publishers are not very reputable.
do a google search for them and look at the third link from yale.edu on top of that there is this article showing they accepted a rubbish paper. listen, i saw a building freefall and turn to dust from an alleged slow burning oxygen starved kerosene fire. it does not make sense. but bentham's reputation is hampering progress. a reputable truly peer-reviewed journal will never likely touch anything to do with WTC due to bullying and intimidation. sucks. |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|