|
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Avalon Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Germany
Posts: 1,151
|
I took this for a while but I'm not sure it did me too good. Can anyone confirm that this turns the body more acidic?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Avalon Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 151
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Avalon Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Germany
Posts: 1,151
|
That's weird because this guy is boosting PH of water with it:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vs751PHS4i4 |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Avalon Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: At the doors of perception
Posts: 2,135
|
Ok ,i understand you guys saying that regular detox is necessary. My concern is that the colon or the body can become addicted to certain chemicals ,and we don't want that.Its like being on life support for ever.
If you eat properly,shouldn't this aid as a continous detox, because of all the pass bad eating habits has changed. I welcome as much response as possible. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Avalon Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: At the doors of perception
Posts: 2,135
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Avalon Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Washington state
Posts: 743
|
I don't consider it a "regular detox" as much as the fact that there are pathogens my body at this point doesn't or can't "fight off" we have them in our bodies all the time, we're never clear of them and our immune system is better or worse, depending on a whole series of factors (like chemtrails), at keeping them under control - 6 drops a couple of times a week would prevent these issues. Plus you can't control for a mosquito bite, or see every fly walking around your food. Pathogens grow in an anerobic "atmosphere" - this makes your body more aerobic.
This is not like the colon becoming "addicted" to or dependent on laxatives, where it ceases to provide the peristaltic movements because the laxatives do it for it. I also don't think you can "eat properly" anymore. You can do the best you can, but there's so much you don't have control over, unless you're growing all your own and have 100% control of the preparation and serving process. jmho alys Last edited by alyscat; 02-18-2009 at 02:46 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
Avalon Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Germany
Posts: 1,151
|
Quote:
Otherwise I agree with Alyscat here. (Nice name!) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Avalon Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 151
|
Quote:
So far I've been on the sidelines but I have issues I want to try tackle with this stuff for sure. The last of my mercury fillings came out (ouch) yesterday so maybe I can muster the discipline to put up with the side effects now that one of my major sources of pollution is gone. Aside from the government going ape**** when the term is used casually, should this substance be called a drug and not a supplement? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
Avalon Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Germany
Posts: 1,151
|
Quote:
I find it rather hard to take the vitamins and MMS though in a workday routine. One neutralises the other after all. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Avalon Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Turtle Island
Posts: 2,776
|
Since everyone is talking about alkaline and acidic nature I thought I would add this information.
Question to Jim Humble: Do you have any scientific proof that MMS attacks only pathogens and toxins due to their acidic nature? In your DVD and elsewhere you state that pathogens, toxins, etc. have an acidic nature, which makes the alkaline MMS only attack (oxidize, or rip the electrons off) the bad things. Do you have any scientific proof that this is generally or 100% applicable? Answer: Further research on the Internet and interviews with various chemists and professors of biochemistry I have more data. It turns out that chlorine dioxide has the lowest oxidation potential of all the major oxidizers used in the body, that is, oxygen, ozone, hydrogen peroxide, and hypochlorous acid (the body makes them all in small quantities). Yet, it provides 2.5 times more oxidation capacity (number of electrons that it will accept) than the other oxidizers. This just happens to be the reason that it has been used in water purification systems through out the world for the past 70 years which has pretty well proven out the theory. It kills the pathogens in the water systems with out killing the friendly bacteria. It does not have enough potential to oxidize or rust the machinery that is in the water as well. Keep in mind that we are talking about very weak solutions of chlorine dioxide in water systems and in the body. (When powerful solutions 10,000 times that used in the body are involved chlorine dioxide can and will do more damage.) Chlorine dioxide has 2.5 times the oxidization capacity (but much lower oxidation potential) than chlorine and it oxidizes in a totally different manner. When chlorine exchanges electrons (call chlorination) it combines with the item being oxidized thus creating more chemicals, some of which are harmful. In comparison, chlorine dioxide does not combine with the item being oxidized, it merely tears it apart. Since the body is more than 70% water, chlorine dioxide works well in the body. My original discussion of this concerning pH may or may not be significant. That was as a result of discussions with chemists at the time I was writing the book. For a complete discussion of the chemistry and use of chlorine dioxide refer to the Lenntech brochure on the industrial uses of chlorine dioxide. In this brochure there is much scientific data concerning industrial use and much data allowing one to extrapolate the results one would get in the body. http://www.lenntech.com/water-disinf...ne-dioxide.htm So we have 70 years of proof that chlorine dioxide has the ability to selectively kill pathogens, but why does this happen. Why does it select out the pathogens. The first point is that pathogens are anaerobic. The skin (cell wall) of an anaerobic microbe is of a nature that is quite different than beneficial bacteria. It is oxidized when touched by chlorine dioxide. Chlorine dioxide kills anaerobic microbes by blowing holes in the cell wall. This is the reason that microbiologists have said that microbes will never develop a resistance to chlorine dioxide. Antibiotics kill by attacking the nucleus of the cell in some way, and there are hundreds of ways that the cell can develop a resistance to that, but there is no developing a resistance to blowing a hole in the cell wall. It’s like trying to develop a resistance to dynamite. No matter what you do, the dynamite is still gong to blow a hole in your skin. You may notice that molds and other fungus are very weak. The big one ones can be torn apart by hand. They are anaerobic and put together weaker. Chlorine dioxide has all that it takes to kill them. FREE DOWNLOAD Part 1 of Jim Humble's book. Click on ABOUT MMS Scroll down to MMS RESOURCES and the last post is the FREE DOWNLOAD http://www.mmsmiracle.com/hereforhealing Low cost shipping in the states. Ships worldwide too. I like the dropper tops at this website, as opposed to the flip top dropper tops which allow extra drops to come out, and they don't crystalize around the opening. |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Avalon Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Southern England
Posts: 458
|
Just finished my first 'run' with it.......got up to 15 twice a day for like 8 days, then felt perhaps I should back off to a once a week dose.
typically, felt bloody awful the first day off it as I started to get some kind of cold....so did a 5 drop maintenance dose, had a long nap and felt much better. Next up; making colloidal silver! .....so I'm gonna start that up, then get back on the drops after.......I've been a painter and decorator, so I probably have some seriously bad chemical buildup in my system, never mind having lived in London for 11 years. and the rest. it really works for specific ailments like the cold I mentioned, so really great to have it in the cabinet. In fact I think it's probably an idea to stockpile a few bottles - things are cheap right now, but for how much longer.....? By the way, thanks peaceandlove for your dilligent [and patient!] handling of this excellent thread. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|