Was haiti quake HAARP induced?

Phoenix · 01-16-2010, 01:48 PM

Interesting article but it has no substance, little more than propoganda and is just as damaging as any.

"Then I noticed that Stephanopolis -- Clinton's former Press Secretary was anchoring the news."

Hasnt he been anchoring news for a while and as a top political correspondant, isnt he well qualified to do so?

"Clearly this was a well-staged event."

Clearly? This statement is opinion and has no factual basis.

"Anyway, I knew from that broadcast that the broadcast was a component of a well planned operation."

Again, opinion based on.... who knows?

"They had the motive and the means to create this earthquake. None of the properties or people were important to the interests that I know were responsible for the 9-11 deaths...etc"

He does not mention what the motive is or what it is based on, again opinion - not fact. Is he qualified to comment on earthquake effects and resulting tsunamis?

There is a war of propoganda on both sides, be careful before choosing one or the other. Was HAARP the cuase of the quake in Oklahoma yesterday? The one is SoCal today? Venezuala or Columbia? The Kurilo Islands, the Western Caroline Islands or the Andaman Islands?

Or is HAARP just responsible for the ones that make headlines?
Perhaps it is possible that this is a natural occurrance which has affected this planet for millions of years and any subterfuge exists in the minds of the paranoid delusionals.

Maybe this forum shoud be renamed "The Kings New Clothes......"

01-16-2010, 01:48 PM	#11
Phoenix Avalon Senior Member Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: Inverness Posts: 116	Re: Was haiti quake HAARP induced? Interesting article but it has no substance, little more than propoganda and is just as damaging as any. "Then I noticed that Stephanopolis -- Clinton's former Press Secretary was anchoring the news." Hasnt he been anchoring news for a while and as a top political correspondant, isnt he well qualified to do so? "Clearly this was a well-staged event." Clearly? This statement is opinion and has no factual basis. "Anyway, I knew from that broadcast that the broadcast was a component of a well planned operation." Again, opinion based on.... who knows? "They had the motive and the means to create this earthquake. None of the properties or people were important to the interests that I know were responsible for the 9-11 deaths...etc" He does not mention what the motive is or what it is based on, again opinion - not fact. Is he qualified to comment on earthquake effects and resulting tsunamis? There is a war of propoganda on both sides, be careful before choosing one or the other. Was HAARP the cuase of the quake in Oklahoma yesterday? The one is SoCal today? Venezuala or Columbia? The Kurilo Islands, the Western Caroline Islands or the Andaman Islands? Or is HAARP just responsible for the ones that make headlines? Perhaps it is possible that this is a natural occurrance which has affected this planet for millions of years and any subterfuge exists in the minds of the paranoid delusionals. Maybe this forum shoud be renamed "The Kings New Clothes......"