|
|
Project Avalon General Discussion Finding safe places, information and resources for building communities, site suggestions. |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#17 | ||
Avalon Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Caribbean
Posts: 375
|
![]() Quote:
it will become easier for them. Although the reason given is 'higher reliability' the real reason is exactly this ... In the new lower layers is specified where the packet is coming from and where it is going to. So it should increase reliability when routing the packet. But instead of course it is about more control. Not only can they track even better WHO is spreading WHAT but also they can mess with traffic in a convenient way. You can let specific packets get lost so you annoy people and they quit visiting the targeted website(s). You can do this on critical interconnecting points to disrupt source or destination areas. So what everyone experiences can be totally different depending on your location. Quote:
the island and I unfortunately cannot rule them out for screwing up ![]() That you have more problems with certain websites can be related to your location (distance/path) with respect to the location where the server for that specific website resides. For Firefox users there is a little bit more help: there is an add-on 'clear cache button' that you can place on top. When you have problems loading a page then press stop, clear cache and retry. Sometimes hitting enter while in the address bar works better than pressing the reload button. Hope that explains and helps a little Cheers |
||
![]() |
![]() |
|
|