Quote:
Originally Posted by Luana
AJ, I wonder if you have bought and read any of the alta reports? If you have, then you are able to be part of the webbot discussion forum. They have been keeping track of bot hits. There are way to many to post here. Which is one of the reasons Clif is so highly thought of here.
|
And that's the real point isn't it! It seems that AJ has taken the same sorry tack that Bill has on this issue and franciejones post/issue... seems more like the AGW crowd throwing questionable and demonstrably blatant incorrect 'facts' around for some 'cya.'
AJ, you by your own admission have seen that the 'disclaimer' regarding 'entertainment' has been removed from the site (it's now included in each report with very detailed reasons) and as stated by the quoted post, you probably have never spent any time reading any of them. Additionally, HPH states specifically that they 'do not make predictions' as you accuse, they make 'forecasts' just like the jolly ole weathermen in the UK. Do you understand the difference between the two? Do you give them the same disregard in their profession you give HPH?
As stated, there are plenty of 'bot hits' if you care to objectively review them. You stating that the 'predictions', which they are not, have never had one hit supported by news articles, etc, is just plain ignorant!
As many of us here have stated many times, there are some very intelligent and thoughtful people here who hold Clif in high regard because we have spent the time analyzing his body of work. The latest childish and nefarious non-sense that has come from the latest PC/PA interviews/interviewees/protection & defection of 'whistleblowers' and their questionable pasts have raised serious concerns for those of us who have followed both PC/PA & HPH. It's funny that you don't see any of these types of issues surrounding HPH...except when Bill stumbled and created a reason for Clif to clarify facts from fiction...which by all accounts, was done very well and Bill hasn't even attempted to address what Glif wrote...where's the truth in that AJ?
We are trying to get to the bottom of the truth. If you have 'facts' that support your position, bring it on. Otherwise, stop wasting your valuable keyboard and internet time with your negative, factless, agenda driven drivel so the rest of us can continue pursuing the truth!
Oh, one more question...do you believe in AGW?
Peace,
YinYangMind