With all due respect, Love, the article you attached that bashes Burisch is filled with misleading information, half-truths and below-the-belt insults. Also, the spelling errors are quite entertaining... I mean, just look at the title of the piece: "Dan Burisch was mankind's last hope to save the planet and ET from a cosmic catastrophe...at least that's what he and his suppoters would have you believe." Hmmm -- us Burisch "suppoters" believe Dan is mankind's "last hope," eh?
Here is a quote taken from the pages of Project Camelot that sums up this Burisch debate quite nicely...
"There are a number of sites on the internet that are almost rabid in their criticism of Dan [Burisch]. Some individuals seem to spend most of their lives attacking his credibility (and one has to wonder who is paying them for this apparent full-time job!). One also has to wonder why they focus so much of their attention on him in particular.
When we met Dan for the first time, in July 2006, he showed us certain documents, not in the public domain, establishing his ID and bona fides. There are reasons why these are not publicly available, and we were asked to sign an NDA (a non-disclosure agreement)...
The important part of the details of Dan's testimony were independently confirmed by our insider source Henry Deacon - who had not previously heard of Dan. This is extremely important, as Henry was able to support the more challenging parts of Dan's testimony: that we had been visited by time-traveling future humans, that resulting from this there were difficult and complex problems with entangled and overlapping timelines, and that there were major threats to the human race in the relatively near future."
Taken from, "A Personal Commentary on the Information."
http://www.projectcamelot.org/commentary.html