jujumon

Although I appreciate Bill and Kerry's efforts in all the work they have done, I am beginning to think, especially with Bill Deagle's Interview, that they are interjecting themselves into the interview way too much. Its great to steer the interviewee in the direction to get the most out of him, but I think agreeing and disagreeing with him during the interview makes it more of a conversation rather than a way to extract information from him. In fact it may even be better to get a list of specific questions from members here before an interview so as to make the interviews more productive. just my 2 cents worth..

Good journalism requires that the interviewer be neutral, at least seem neutral anyway