Good morning truth seekers :-)
I woke up to a gift today in the form of :
.................................................. ...........................
ARCHAEOLOGY DAILY NEWS
http://www.archaeologydaily.com/news...excavated.html
132 archaeological sites in Egypt not excavated
May 12th 2009
Egypt State Information Service Culture Minister Farouk Hosni said that the researches conducted via satellites have confirmed the existence of 132 archaeological sites in Egypt that witnessed no excavations until now.
Farouk Hosni said Egypt's shows full cooperation with the research teams to explore the archaeological sites, and has recently issued a number of laws seeking to stop the illegal digging in areas likely to contain the buried monuments. He is pointing out that project of monuments photography via satellite is being implemented in collaboration with the National Authority for Remote Sensing, Space Sciences and Mubarak City for Scientific Research for the aerial photography and ground laser.
Meanwhile, Secretary General of the Supreme Council of Antiquities (SCA) Zahi Hawas pointed out that satellites took photos for many archeological sites including Habu city.
.................................................. ................
There is no great satisfaction for me when I say " I told you so! " Only sadness that it has taken this long to be reported officially.
From our own information as others will have read, the Egyptian Government have been working much more deeply than this article suggests with GPR imaging to sniff out the really ancient anomolies. In fact this forms the basis behind our conclusions to the "Explosions in the Desert" page, displayed on site.
http://www.richardgabriel.info/002%20INDEX%20PAGE.html
We understand the locations of speculated sites cannot be splashed over the internet before investigation, but just as we have done in our presentation pages, there is nothing to stop the reporting and discussing of the potential from these sites while still protecting their identities.
For sure it would be cited that they wish not to fuel pure speculation, but readers are not fools.
Healthy and fair interest would be shown if at least the preliminary reasons were given for the various targets.
I would understand completely however if they wished to keep everyone dumb to the finding of anomolies which suggested advanced technology.... like the aquaduct from mountain range to barren desert over tens of underground miles which we learned of and wrote about!!
Sorry, but it is so difficult to remain uncynical.
Blessings
Richard
with Judith